News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by calvinmorrison on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:54PM (#47174782)
mark my words, they will burn at some point. The government can nationalize it at any moment if they desire.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by Davidzheng on Thursday February 26, 2026 @07:59PM (#47174828)
Then maybe Dario will realize that the moral superiority that he bases his advocacy against Chinese open models is naive at best.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by jimmydoe on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:07PM (#47174913)
his against Chinese models is smoking screen for their resistance to DOW, they are not even pretending
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by jacquesm on Thursday February 26, 2026 @09:41PM (#47175719)
Better naive than malicious.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by moozooh on Friday February 27, 2026 @07:33AM (#47179772)
You're saying that as if these two things are mutually exclusive.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mrguyorama on Friday February 27, 2026 @01:20PM (#47183668)
At a certain level, ignorance IS malicious.

If you have more money than god, you no longer get to play the "I didn't know" game. You have the resources. If you don't know, you made a choice to not know.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by jacquesm on Saturday February 28, 2026 @10:20AM (#47196310)
The first one is definitely one we agree on and the second was one that I had not clued into so thank you.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by viking123 on Friday February 27, 2026 @12:57AM (#47177008)
Every day I hope the Chinese models get "good enough" to drop these corporate ones. I think we are heading towards it.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by tw1984 on Friday February 27, 2026 @01:41AM (#47177330)
kid, time to grow up and face the reality

Chinese models are developed by Chinese corporate. they are free and open weight because they are the underdog atm. they are not here for fun, they are here to compete.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by viking123 on Friday February 27, 2026 @01:48AM (#47177373)
The competition is good though, it will push down the prices for all of us. At some point being behind 5% won’t have much practical difference. Most people won’t even notice it.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by xvector on Friday February 27, 2026 @04:55AM (#47178669)
The moment the Chinese create a model that is "good enough" they won't open source it
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by viking123 on Friday February 27, 2026 @06:45AM (#47179416)
I will gladly switch to that one if their CEO is less of sociopath than Altman and god forbid Amodei. In fact I use some of the new Chinese models at home and compared to Opus 4.6 AGI, the difference is getting less. Codex 5.3 xhigh is already better than opus anyway.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by jazzyjackson on Friday February 27, 2026 @01:45AM (#47177346)
“I don’t need to win, I just need you to lose”
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by estearum on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:29PM (#47175095)
Imagine the government trying to force AI researchers to advance, lmao
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by dylan604 on Thursday February 26, 2026 @08:53PM (#47175302)
Would anyone pull a Pied Piper and choose to destroy the thing rather than let it be subverted? I know that's not exactly what PP did, but would a decision like that only ever happen in fiction?
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by cmrdporcupine on Thursday February 26, 2026 @09:45PM (#47175747)
It wouldn't need to. As sibling commenter pointed out... they'd have a massive exodus of talent, and they'd cease to make progress on new models and would be overtaken (arguably GPT 5.3 has already overtaken them).
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by gdhkgdhkvff on Thursday February 26, 2026 @09:14PM (#47175497)
Flagship LLM companies seem like the absolute worst possible companies to try and nationalize.

1. There would absolutely be mass resignations, especially at a company like Anthropic that has such an image (rightfully or wrongfully) of “the moral choice”. 2. No one talented will then go work for a government-run LLM building org. Both from a “not working in a bureaucracy” angle and a “top talent won’t accept meager government wages” angle (plus plenty of “won’t work for trump” angle) 3. With how fast things move, Anthropic would become irrelevant in like 3 months if they’re not pumping out next gen model updates.

Then one of the big American LLM companies would be gone from the scene, allowing for more opportunity for competition (including Chinese labs)

It would be the most shortsighted nationalization ever.

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by gambiting on Friday February 27, 2026 @03:59AM (#47178290)
>> No one talented will then go work for a government-run LLM building org.

I think you massively underestimate how many people would have no problem working for their government on this. Just look at the recent research into the Persona system for ID verification, where submitting your ID places you on a permanent government watchlist to check if you're not a terrorist. There's a whole list of engineers and PhDs and researchers present who have built this system.

>> “top talent won’t accept meager government wages” angle

Again, that's wishful thinking - plenty of people want to work in cybersecurity in AI research for the government agencies, even if the pay isn't anywhere close to the private sector. This isn't exclusive to the US either - in the UK MI5 pays peanuts compared to the private companies for IT specialists, yet they have plenty of people who want to work for them, either because of patriotism for their country and willingness to "help".

Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by moozooh on Friday February 27, 2026 @07:32AM (#47179765)
Makes me wonder how the engineers working for the "moral choice" company felt about it dealing with Palantir, a company perhaps the furthest away from anything moral.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by mrits on Friday February 27, 2026 @05:39PM (#47186763)
Anthropic is giving huge bonuses and paying the most. This is the reason talent is there.
Re:Statement from Dario Amodei on Our Discussions with the D... by drcongo on Friday February 27, 2026 @06:22AM (#47179232)
But that's socialism.