News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by frankzander on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:36AM (#40913101)
Really? In Asia Tofu and Tempeh is well established in the cuisine so ... At the end it's a matter of getting used to new tastes.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:07AM (#40913286)
Yes they like tofu, they also love meat.

Try to not eat meat in Asian countries. My wife gave up being vegetarian while we were over there.

Whether it's Japan, Korea, Philippines, or otherwise, they love meat, in many forms. Especially chicken.

As do I.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by Klonoar on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:18AM (#40913684)
> Try to not eat meat in Asian countries.

Eh, some Asian countries are easier than others.

I've had no issues avoiding meat/dairy in when living in Japan[1]/Taiwan/Singapore, and these are all cases where you can find a vegetarian or vegan version of a local dish so you're not missing out on the culture. I know many over there who make it work without issue too.

Korea and the Philippines though... for sure an example of higher difficulty.

[1] Okinawa is slightly harder than mainline Japan due to regional cuisine differences, but even then it's not the end of the world.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by rvnx on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:35AM (#40913476)
Japan is still very late when it is about animal considerations and welfare.

When you see their very tiny cages in animal shops, or eating octopus alive (“but they don’t feel anything”).

It is a bit like if they still live in the 90s (though it’s an amazing place! Like the 90s were).

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:43AM (#40913508)
I feel like they take fine care of animals, I'll aside that point though for the sake of continuing the discussion.

But my point was that pretty much all asian countries love meat.

I mean, food in South Korea and the Philippines is 90% chicken.

Meat consumption is everywhere, because it provides the calories people need, easily, and tastes delicious.

People don't want to (and sometimes can't!) eat the stuff we feed to cows and chicken, anywhere.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by Al-Khwarizmi on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:29AM (#40913734)
I would say they eat a smaller proportion of meat. Many Asian dishes do have meat but it's just one out of many ingredients, including rice/noodles, vegs, spices, etc. While in the West sometimes we just eat meat with a side of potatoes or whatever, maybe some spices but the majority of the dish by mass is meat.

I agree that it's not necessarily easy to find dishes with no meat at all in Asian countries, though.

It's probably a better strategy to try to convince people to eat less meat per dish (as in many Asian preparations) than to go vegetarian, anyway. At least it would be easier to convince me, that's for sure... if my country had the hawker stalls that they have in Singapore, I would already be eating less meat.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:39AM (#40913787)
It depends on the country.

In Japan many dishes are what you describe.

In Korea and the Philippines, many dishes are pure meat.

I have no strategy or intent to control peoples diet though.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by sociorealist on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:00AM (#40913601)
Exactly. Just that the Westerners who don't travel just don't know these facts of life, as it's not stated on their beloved Wikipedia!

(source: self-travelled, have multiple contacts in different APAC countries)

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by karaokeyoga on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:29AM (#40913443)
Beef and tofu go very well together. As an ex-vegetarian (from my childhood) it took me a while to get used to seeing tofu (successfully) mixed with meat.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by pickledoyster on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:29AM (#40913438)
the worst meat dishes I'd ever had were in the Philippines. ymmv
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:46AM (#40913526)
what?! their chicken is amazing.

you can even go to any mcdonalds there and get the most delicious, juicy white meat chicken you've ever had. not nuggets, full fried breasts.

literally every place serves fried chicken and it's amazing, every place also has spaghetti which I found... odd.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by mcmoor on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @05:04AM (#40913939)
Yeah we eat less meat solely because of economical reasons. If we have the means we absolutely add lots of meat on top of those delicious vegetable dishes. We even cook some animal organs because it's cheap and delicious.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by temporarely on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @08:33AM (#40915348)
Just as a note (and as someone born in Asia): Asia spans the range from Iran to Japan. East Asia is not Asia. It's the Eastern bit.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by chii on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:48AM (#40913158)
i will not give up meat for tofu, no matter how tasty the tofu is (and it is tasty).

What i will do is eat both meat _and_ tofu.

The idea that people would voluntarily stop eating meat and switch to a vegitarian diet is just wishful thinking.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by _fizz_buzz_ on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:53AM (#40913187)
Probably a more realistic approach would be to convince people to eat less meat. I significantly reduced my meat consumption, but when I eat it I am looking for really high quality meat, such as locally grass fed beef.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eru on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:12AM (#40913320)
Yes, if you look at actual impact instead of at moral judgement, then getting someone to reduce their consumption by x% gets you x% towards the same goal as complete abstinence.

Similar, if you can get a population to reduce their consumption by x%, it doesn't matter if that's because x% went totally without (and the rest didn't change anything), or whether you could a more uniform, mild change.

Convincing people to give up some meat is pretty straightforward: one proven way is for meat to become more expensive. People react to economic incentives on the margin after all. Other ways might be to make the alternatives more appealing.

(About the margins: meat would have to get extremely expensive for many people to completely give up on it. But if sometimes you are deciding between going to a steak place and a pasta place, and then price can sway your decision fairly easily. The meal at the pasta place can still have meat in it for this example to work, just less of it.)

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:13AM (#40913330)
If it's over a steak place or pasta place it will be steak every time, no matter the price.

I feel like shit after eating pasta, so I never eat it. I feel great after eating meat, so I always eat it.

But we don't eat out, that's more wasteful and expensive than anything else. fires up the grill

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eru on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:13AM (#40913662)
Well, I'm sure you can see that other people might eat pasta (as evidenced by pasta still being produced by profit-oriented companies), and I'm sure you also have some other opportunities in your life where you are deciding between different amounts of meat you could eat?

> But we don't eat out, that's more wasteful and expensive than anything else. fires up the grill

That might be true for you. But there are also people who eg want to eat stuff from the grill perhaps once a year, and storing their own idle grill the other 364 days would be wasteful.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:19AM (#40913689)
That's totally fine, people can eat whatever they want, however they want.

And yes, I'm constantly deciding between different amounts of meat I can eat, it usually depends on how hungry I am.

I decide the amounts, what meat protein, then pick veggies that go with it, and add a small amount of carbs.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eru on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:45AM (#40913816)
Btw, if you want to keep your habits, but for some reason feel guilty about your resource consumption, you could just pay two other people to go vegan (or four other people to cut back their meat consumption by half), and you would achieve twice as much as by changing your own diet.

In terms of overall utilitarian impact, I mean. Not in terms of some moral systems.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @05:00AM (#40913914)
Is there an app for that?

I think people around here would charge too much to go vegan.

It might be cheaper use people on the West Coast.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eru on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @10:18AM (#40916465)
It seems like you envision paying Americans to eat less meat?

In the grand scheme of things, Americans are very expensive people. For example, Argentinians both eat a lot of meat, and are currently in dire need for some hard currency.

I don't know if there's an app for this. However, you could do the next best thing and find a charity that works on promoting eating-less-meat in Argentina.

(Argentina is just an example, I have no clue whether it's the best value for money for this very specific. I'm just fairly sure that they are better value for money than spending money in the US.)

https://blog.givewell.org/2010/12/27/animal-welfare-charitie... might be an interesting read.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @11:21AM (#40917154)
I was joking as you brought it up. I don't believe anyone needs to eat less meat.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by normie3000 on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:55AM (#40913198)
> The idea that people would voluntarily stop eating meat and switch to a vegitarian diet is just wishful thinking.

Is it? I know many people who have done this.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by chii on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:57AM (#40913218)
> I know many people who have done this.

and how many people do you know, out of all of the people in the world?

And how many of those won't do it?

What you have as evidence of it happening is merely sampling bias.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eigenket on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:39AM (#40913491)
The fact that vegetarians and vegans exist isn't a "sampling bias".
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by chii on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @05:10AM (#40913976)
i am not denying their existence. I am denying that there's a way forward for combatting climate change in having people unvoluntarily forced to be vegetarians.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by eigenket on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @08:44AM (#40915437)
This is exactly the sort of "argument" which makes talking with Americans (I'm assuming here, but you sound like an American to me) such an unenjoyable pastime.

This is the level of strawman we show to small children as examples of terrible strawman arguments. I haven't seen anyone in this thread asking for involuntarily forcing people to give up meat. There isn't a single significant politician in the USA or Europe who is talking about forcing people to give up meat.

I can only hope you were deliberately trying to make a shitty argument for some reason, otherwise it seems likely that the BGH, HFC and antibiotics in your diet have addled your brain.

The most radically environmentalist thing people are arguing for is for you to take a modicum of responsibility for the negative impacts of your choices. If you love beef for some reason then just plant a couple of trees when you eat it or do some other actions that offset the carbon.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by OccamsMirror on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:27AM (#40913421)
Are you trying to say that Silicon Valley is not representative of the rest of the world? Outrageous.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by fulafel on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:14AM (#40913337)
We've switched away from unethical but convenient/enjoyable practices before.

When you look at the diets by age group it's also pretty telling: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1313072/vegan-by-age-grou...

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by blackjack_ on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:44AM (#40913514)
Maybe but in the early 1800s there was a guy similarly saying “The idea that people would voluntarily stop enslaving people and switch to paying wages is just wishful thinking” and yet we seemed to have changed that one.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:49AM (#40913543)
uhm no, they just switched to outsourcing the work to poorer countries and bringing in "migrant workers" so they don't have to pay them min. wage.

and I wouldn't compare slavery to meat consumption.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by sociorealist on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:01AM (#40913610)
Yes, the slave work for producing their Apple gear and Balenciagas is done offshore, ofc.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by wyre on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:23AM (#40913705)
Even though you wouldn't make the comparison doesn't make it any less so.

Marjorie Spiegal wrote about it in length in her book "The Dreaded Comparison"

https://archive.org/details/dreadedcompariso0000spie_o7y4/pa...

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by theultdev on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:33AM (#40913754)
I'm saying I disagree with the comparison, and thus wouldn't make it.

You can attempt to argue for the merits of the comparison, in your own words, if you'd like.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by Al-Khwarizmi on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @04:43AM (#40913808)
I hate to bring the cynical take, but it has often been argued that slavery ended to a great extent due to economic factors (slavery simply not being so profitable anymore due to the rise of industrial capitalism, need of more skilled labor, decline of the profitability of plantations, cost of maintaining the system and stopping revolts, etc.).

Not saying that it was 100% economic and moral/ethical awakening didn't play an important role, but the economic changes definitely helped. And this kind of favorable factors aren't apparent in the case of convincing everyone to go vegetarian.

Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by b800h on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @03:14AM (#40913338)
I've switched to eating meat on four festivals during the year. The rest of the time I'm pescatarian with dairy. I've not done it for any ethical reasons besides my own health, but I do feel healthier for it. Without the fish it'd be bloody depressing, quite frankly.
Re:Nearly 2M metric tons of wild fish used to feed Norwegian... by seoulmetro on Tuesday July 09, 2024 @02:55AM (#40913205)
In Asia people still prefer meat.

This is like saying Americans like corn chips. Sure... but they would probably prefer beef patties. (lol)

I absolutely love tofu and lived in East Asia. But it doesn't replace meat.