News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by nicgrev103 on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:28AM (#32165513)
"Perhaps the most important factor, though, is that because WIGs are not classed as aircraft the regulations that govern them are far less onerous. That means that they don’t need to carry the kind of backup power that an aircraft would need for emergency landings, and they don’t need to be flown by trained airline pilots."

Just what every passenger wants to hear haha

They say this is a solution for the fact electric airplanes are going to only be able to hop between cities and then says how this can only go 180 miles with 12 passengers, hardly a long distance, oh and it has to be across a body of water... and the water can't be too rough... sounds like a great solution!

Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by gonzo41 on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:48AM (#32165736)
So what I'm hearing is we need to just invest in more trains.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by kumarvvr on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:34PM (#32174733)
Investment in trains can go hand in hand with this.

Both have their own pros and cons.

But, when evaluating the setup of a public transport system, this could be one more option.

Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by darknavi on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @05:29PM (#32172605)
Screw trains. Lets rip them out and build man-made rivers so we can use our water planes!
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by moffkalast on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:45AM (#32165707)
It's just an ekranoplan with a lower range, lower speed and less capacity than a traditional jet powered one. And even those didn't catch on because of the calm seas requirement and because it's easier and more practical to just fly.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by deepsun on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:59PM (#32174904)
It's also easier and more practical to just float. With hydrofoils. But someone already doing that commercially, bummer.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by spoonjim on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @12:35PM (#32168281)
That's why the Soviet Union is the country that consistently invested in ground effect vehicles... because they have the Caspian Sea and Black Sea (which does have waves but usually <3 ft)
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by dzhiurgis on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @10:20AM (#32166137)
Single missed rogue wave and everyone is dead… Trialing with cargo might work tho.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by z9znz on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @11:44AM (#32167409)
You wouldn't be flying this over bodies of water which could have rogue waves. Those are generally open sea scenarios, and this is really only practical for hops between relatively close bodies of land, over water. There are a lot of such places around the world, even some where the water is technically connected to an ocean.

In terms of risk of life, it's probably less risk than taking a 180 mile bus ride... even if it were crossing water which could conceivably have a rogue wave appear.

Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by AustinDev on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @12:05PM (#32167766)
Yeah Miami to Nassau seems like a decent candidate.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by ch4s3 on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @09:39AM (#32165633)
Might be nice in Sweden?
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by ElevenLathe on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @11:22AM (#32167054)
Potentially between Great Lakes cities (Milwaukee-Chicago-Detroit, though probably not Detroit as its a long detour through the Straight of Mackinac) or as fast riverboats.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by uxp100 on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @11:54AM (#32167566)
Yeah, that dumb Milwaukee to Chicago flight. The Hiawatha doesn’t go to Ohare (an existing right of way, would add time a little bit of time to the main downtown to downtown trip, but it’s so dumb it doesn’t have at least a glenview to ohare connection), just the Milwaukee airport, and anyway I suppose airlines would rather you be in their system as soon as possible. But such a dumb flight. Take off, then land, hope you don’t spend more time taxiing than in the air.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by ElevenLathe on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @12:07PM (#32167786)
I've needed to go to Kalamazoo several times, connecting through O'hare. On the return trip, because of the timezone change and the extremely short flight (~15m IIRC), the arrival time printed on your ticket is earlier than your departure time.
Re:Electric seagliders could enable short-haul emissions-fre... by euroderf on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @02:43PM (#32170348)
Buffalo NY (via Lewiston NY) <=> Toronto had a fast hovercraft service for some years. This might work there with a speedy transfer between Lewiston and Buffalo. Toronto to Rochester NY too. Erie PA.