There are lots of good arguments against pulling in lots of rust dependencies - it's too much code to audit, maintained by too many different upstream people and teams, lots more tooling would be needed to make sure all the dependencies are safe to use in the kernel, and on and on - but this one about an internet connection is both the most common one I've seen here and the most superficial and frankly silly.
So I agree, this particular criticism is very confusing. Though as I said, that doesn't mean no criticism is warranted!
'rustc' does not, but we are talking about cargo here.
Thank you!
This has to be one of the most insane threads I've read in a while.
Given that the circulation for Linuxformat was just 19,000 in 2014, it seems that that number backs up the position that you wouldn’t find this at a street level vendor.
Any way, the whole argument is redundant. Go head to your nearest newsagent and see if they stock it. If you live on top of a train station or a supermarket then you’re due both congratulations and commiserations.
For everyone else… you can’t buy them at your nearest kiosk.
Because it’s not 2007, no matter how hard you wish it to be.
We have quite a bit of choice and they all have recent-ish issues: https://www.journaux.fr/linux_informatique_1_0_130.html and you can find at least a couple of them in most kiosks ; at least Linux Identity always comes with a physical disk
10-15 years ago I'd agree with you, now... that would actually surprise me.
(But why wouldn't you have readers for all 3, potentially as peripherals if you don't have a desktop ?)
When I built my current PC, I didn't bother with a 3.5" floppy drive, but I still had to get an USB one a couple of years ago when an acquaintance showed up needing to read some files from them...
Linux package maintainers do the vetting. Buildbots build in a clean room environment, without Internet access.
If you mix up the steps supply chain security is gone.
Working offline is needed