Chinese society has been largely open for the last 2 years, yet hospitals have not been overwhelmed, and hardly anyone even knows anyone who's gotten CoVID-19.
The measures that public health authorities in Chinese cities take to squash outbreaks are highly visible. If there's a single known case in a city, the building where the person lives will be locked down, the neighborhood (or even the entire city) will be PCR tested, and everyone who's been near the infected person will be quarantined. These measures work.
The answer to that is that the regime can do anything it wants to, period.
There is no way that China after more than two years, should not have been able to vaccinate those that need the vaccine the most.
Getting COVID is no longer a huge risk and neither is avoiding infections at this point.
No, this is only about control.
How the WHO can report these numbers with a straight face is beyond me.
I think the WHO understands that they've already lost any credibility they once had and have strategically pivoted to being more of a political organization.
1. The death toll is the same, but the number of confirmed cases reported by China CDC is much smaller than WTO (380k vs 710k). I guess people caught covid with no symptoms are excluded by China CDC.
2. After subtracting death toll in Hong Kong and Taiwan, there're only 4.6k deaths in China mainland since 2020.
Lockdown now is not exclusive with false case and death numbers.
My point is that it's on you (and WHO) to explain trusting data supplied by a country with a long history of supplying false data (in other words, believe a known liar).
Come back when you think of an excuse to trust their data without verification.
Your entire premise is based on a straw man. Nobody is blindly accepting China’s data as gospel, they are saying that it’s the only data we have.
You have presented nothing but innuendo.
Although it does not strike me as a bad analogy. The US government thought there were WMDs, but there were none in reality (wrong data, whoops). CCP thought there was no COVID in China, but there was in reality (wrong data, whoops).
I don't know how long China can continue this zero-covid policy, that's a question, people are less worried about the virus now, I hear the same from my parents. At least it is working now. Maybe not in Hong Kong.
Btw, it's 1.5G, not 1G.
Btw, the Chinese government lies about many things but the COVID case numbers weren't lies, at least no lies after March 2020.
Because it doesn’t scale. Giga is the metric prefix for “times billion”.
However, large (and small) numbers don’t end there. What about Quadrillion and Quintillion? What about milli and micro?
Why would that be?
What's up with this pointless snarkiness? You're making it sound like the machinations of an evil propaganda machine, when in reality Belgium has been quite good at overreporting covid stats. Not sure which stats you're referring to as being "some of the worst in the world".
Belgium has been among the top in every chart I've seen. I can't imagine those charts not having been reported on in Belgium.
https://m.dw.com/en/belgiums-coronavirus-overcounting-contro...
Read up about it, before saying they did "terrible".
Statistics in this case are a simplified form of complex policies, ... Countries overcounting vs. undercounting should be the top 1 variable to be aware of.
Ps. I'm from Belgium, I'm very much aware of all statistics and the controversy overcounting causes.
(good article about this in Dutch https://www.ntvg.nl/artikelen/covid-19-oversterfte-de-maat )
Most people that say Belgium did "terrible" don't even know about that.