(Likewise I suspect the weed is the cheapest part of a grow operation.)
Still significantly cheaper than setting up a mining farm with hundreds of legally obtained GPUs.
Several of these companies are publicly traded its really not that hard to get done.
Once you move past the Internet forums debating the existence of this market, try actually research this market its very fast paced and robust.
Its not distinguishable, even for liability purposes and nobody cares, the battle for network control and resource share is far bigger than the worrying about this. I doubt people are going to try to register these gpus and be like “ruh roh this one didnt register”
It’s not going to the moon hard, but waaaaaaay harder than reselling it on Craigslist. And requires significant capital investment.
I'm not sure what you mean by "easy", but "stolen and available" is a lot easier than "legal but require waiting if available at all".
Most multi-GPU farms run like 4-6 GPUs off a single machine. Although some specialized "BTC" motherboards have whacky scalper prices it's not hard to find other motherboards with OK multi-GPU support. You do not need a 'gamer' high performance motherboard to mine effectively. The only thing that really matters is being able to run as many GPUs as it's supposed to without bluescreening.
The power requirements are also not as high as you would expect from the typical power consumption of 30 series cards because it's overall more efficient to mine on much lower overall power consumption than you would get from a gaming workload. Mining just puts stress on different parts of the GPU than gaming and requires less power than a full throttle gaming workload. So you are able to run many more 3080s or what have you on a smaller PSU than you would be able to if you were using those 3080s overclocked and with a high power limit on gaming workloads. You just do not get that much extra hashpower if you go past certain levels of power consumption: it's easier / more efficient to just add another card.
Source: my workstation has 10 GPUs in it. Two are plugged into the mobo. 8 are plugged in via two PCIe switches.
My video card has completely paid for itself almost double what I initially paid for it ($2K in cash from a seller on craigslist, back in January).
The reason I mine this way (instead of with ASICs or dedicated hardware) is because this is all equipment that I would have bought anyways for gaming and/or programming work. I do a lot of gaming in 4K at 120 fps, and the RTX 3090 is pretty much the only video card that can actually pull that off.
Being able to toggle the gaming rig into mining mode whenever I'm not actively using it means that the equipment pays for itself. It's a lot easier to justify spending $6,000 on a gaming rig when that same gaming rig earns you over $100 a month worth of passive income!
Probably more than the entire market cap of Bitcoin.
A variety of reasons. Some think that crypto is a socially pernicious bubble that’ll get people hurt. Others still have to deal with the ransomware attacks that are only viable with crypto. Most of us are pissed off that crypto comes along and keeps ruining the price of hardware we want to buy. The environmentally minded are angry about the energy usage. A lot of us are sick and tired of the naked scamming and the dumb ideas that get floated on the subject.
> I feel that if most HNers would just build a crypto business (DeFi, arbitrage, NFTs, tokenomics, etc.), they'd basically be overnight millionaires.
Obviously not. That’s just not how anything around money works. If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is. Just because someone got rich off a thing doesn’t mean everyone will; after all some people got rich in pyramid schemes too, doesn’t make it a good idea.
Even when there is legitimately easy money to be made, the rush of people trying to exploit the opportunity usually drives the per person profits down to $0. If someone claims that there are easy, guaranteed millions to be made, your alarm bells should be going off.
Furthermore, even this tiny whiff of “you’re just jealous you didn’t make millions flipping NFTs” is an ugly look.
> The environmental claims are all FUD.
This is hilariously unpersuasive. Not even a hint of an argument, just “please ignore the TWh behind the curtain”.
Meanwhile Etherium seems extremely bubbly to me too. At first smart contracts was the only thing that made any sense to me (bitcoin struck me as goldbug nonsense early on), but over the years it seems like it’s mostly used for gambling and making tokens. Nothing that couldn’t be done more efficiently and conveniently off the chain, especially since the oracle problem always looms large over any given hypothetical use case.
At least if they go to POS it’ll be less wasteful.
Decades? With an S? It's barely been 10 years since Bitcoin's public release and that's ignoring the fact that it wasn't particularly popular (and nowhere near as valuable) for another couple of years. Other cryptocurrencies wouldn't come into their own for another couple of years after Bitcoin, either.
For reference, the dot-com bubble began roughly in 1995 and had popped by 2003. Crypto, especially with the fact that it picked up in value an incredible amount in 2020, is a prime candidate for being a bubble.
> I'm sorry there's demand for popular hardware. That's how markets work.
And the actual demand is being exacerbated by the somewhat artificial demand crypto creates. It also likely means that if crypto is a bubble and it pops, there's going to be a glut of pre-owned crypto-abused graphics cards flooding the market. All of this is definitely a knock-on effect of cryptocurrencies booming.
> The environmental claims are all FUD. None of them hold up to the slightest scrutiny.
Would you like to back this claim up with anything? The way proof-of-work crypto works demands computation, which demands power. Imagine if somebody did take this entire pallet of GPUs and start mining cryptocurrency with it; that'd be a pretty good amount of power consumption. Tack on the fact that there are multiple cryptocurrencies and a lot more than just a trailer full of GPUs working on mining them around the world, plus the fact that those GPUs are unlikely to be as efficient as the latest, and you've got a lot of power consumption.
Obviously, I'm not doing the math here, but just thinking about the (apparently hypothetical) power consumption of something like Etherium or Bitcoin is enough to raise red flags in my mind.
This is the only part I disagree with.
Most miners undervolt their cards to minimize heat and lower cooling costs... I'm cool with the rest of your post.
Mining cards are probably fine to use for years and will probably destroy the markets if crypto explodes.
Nvidia is selling GPUs without output capability to miners to avoid exactly that scenario already.
It's uncool to give power to those who already have it.
Crypto just takes power from banks, it gives it to other powerful groups and corporations. Due to the fact that you still need significant investments to keep it running, it's not actually any more democratic.
Any idea that crypto would hurt traditional financial instituons (aside from maybe savings banks, which are generally the least noxious financial institutions around) was pure fantasy
I mean you said it yourself, not particularly bright people get filthy rich, why would actually bright people think that's cool
I don't agree with blaming crypto, but it's true that these are uniquely perfect things to steal.
Imagine being able to steal a printing press that makes bills that can't be linked back to a specific press, that's what they did
I don't know if you understand how crypto mining works, the electricy expense, the infrastructure expense, the actual expertise in setting up geth/mining nodes, etc.
What I don't understand is why people who claim they know these things are acting like you can't make money off a free Ampere card.
-
Like 99% of mining is initial capital, everyone knows that. GPUs alone don't make a farm but you realize the thieves are also motivated to not go to literal prison?
Figure that a fence for stolen goods with trackable serials is already taking a substantial cut if they try to sell.
Mining in an inefficient hacked together "farm" doesn't seem so crappy by comparison suddenly.
It's not like anyone is saying they have to do that, but it's a very unique property of what they stole
What a lovely system we've created, and what lovely incentives.