Which is sad because their pricing model is less stupid than most of the competition.
They got a $1bi shakedown in a local court because they successfully fought the RIA in 2015 and won (it was $25mi then).
This time, Cox legal team tried to simply stand behind the DMCA safe-harbor (just like google does) and somehow lost.
it will appeal and win (or likely settle out of court as RIAA already got what it wanted, a hole in safe-harbor)
Defiantly don't spin up these VPN/VPSs on an account you don't mind losing.
It seems like Torrenting died out significantly over the last 5 years.
Obviously, I have no interest in testing this out myself, so I take their word for it.
Except for those Linux ISOs, of course.
Just don't bother with Big Media content and they won't need a VPN...
There's plenty to do in life other than torrenting the latest HBO series.
And, "Plenty to do in life" is a value judgment, and isn't relevant to this discussion.
i just never wanted my job to hire some dumb IT consulting firm to do some cross between IPs on a swam and IPs VPNing in as a "threat analysis" and my dumb name getting dragged into an office. I know it's far fetched, but $40 a year of PIA keeps my mind at ease.
I'm not condoning piracy, but VPNs are generally a foolproof way to avoid DMCA letters from your ISP. Privacy means something different to every individual, everyone's threat model is different. And many models can benefit from a VPN; journalists, activists, and many others might find benefit from using a VPN.