When I started development 15" monitors were standard and 17" were a luxury. Setting multiple monitors was a must or you would have to constantly switch between editor, terminal and documentation.
If you look at the setup that's exactly what is happening. On a single screen there is browser with documentation (presumably), and there is four (!) IDE/editor/terminal windows.
It's not about how many monitors you have but rather what you are doing with them. You can put Netflix as one of the windows and still get distracted on a single monitor setup or you can have bad sight like me and require two 27" monitors side by side so that I can magnify fonts and have documentation, IDE and terminal at the same time with no strain.
Just to clarify: there are two i3 containers side by side (each using 50%). The left one’s active window is a browser, the right one’s active window is Emacs, in which I have two buffers side by side at the top, and compilation mode and magit status side by side at the bottom.
Writing this comment, though, I realize that a better alt-tab switcher would be a godsend. I keep getting confused with window order sometimes and I'm not sure why, maybe I should write a better switcher.
The idea was to be able to quickly select things to be made visible on both monitors.
The two monitors are named primary and secondary.
To select something to be visible on primary you would press the combination (for example alt+f1) and the selected desktop would be placed on primary. Whatever was on primary would be pushed to secondary.
To select both primary and secondary you would first press what you want on secondary and then what you want on primary.
The idea is that people typically have what I call "scenes". Scene is particular arrangement of windows on both monitors.
This means that you can quickly learn your "scenes" and get them to be visible very quickly, in a fraction of a second, without having to hard-code the scene in your config file.
Sorry if this is really well known I'm new to MS Windows as a user.
I use dual monitor, but have two virtual desktops giving me 4 "screens" to layout windows in. I keep the same window in the same place, but often have to use 3 docs at once and so would love a 3rd screen. Then I'd have reference material on 1), doc I'm responding to on 2), doc I'm writing in also on 2), citations on 3).
On Mac, Quicksilver with Triggers: https://qsapp.com/
EDIT: Turns out it's trivial, I love Linux:
http://xahlee.info/linux/linux_add_keyboard_shortcuts_to_swi...
Just right click on any title bar on a window, go to "Special Application Settings" -> "Arrangement and access" -> "Shortcut". You can manually type "F8" in the shortcut and it'll work just fine.
You can also go to "System Settings" -> "Window Rules" to manage all rules you've defined.
I have also configured the window to always stay on top and to resize to a small window on the bottom right, so if I press escape while the window is focused, I get picture-in-picture.
Also, mpv exits when it's done, so it's a great way of watching a video in full screen on the second monitor at the press of a button.
It doesn't matter if I use 2 27" 1440 monitors or a 32" inch 4K monitor.
Personally, a single 27" 1440 monitor is the bare minimum I am comfortable with in a desktop.
So yes, while in some situations (like debugging a complicated app, or for some "standby" information) multiple monitors are a must, for general use it ends up being too distracting.
Not my case. I don't lay my stuff around. My apps are in the menu, running ones on dock (Mac or Linux) and when I do need to have few windows open at the same time (second one either being terminal or mobile emulator or whatever) I arrange them to fit the same screen. My smallest screen is 15" on my Thinkpad, 17" on MBP and an external is Dell 23". Had no issues so far with my workflow.
For dev work though, typically I need see multiple things simultaneously: input (IDE/editor), output (console/browser) and instrumentation (debugger etc.)
I'm one-monitoring these days (WFH) because my laptop can't output to more than 1 display without a docking station -- I had left mine at the office. The context switching is tiring to say the least. I'm making do by tiling my windows but with a 24" display, there's just not enough room.
I think the author's setup works because he's using a 31" monitor and a tiling window manager. Most window managers don't tile as nicely.
That said, there are tools like Terminator and tmux, which are always useful.
While you couldn't run a game with it, it worked great for work. They seem to have some embeded video card.
(mine is no longer availble . But this looks similar: https://www.newertech.com/products/vidu3dvia.php)
As you mention, I find using a laptop screen for development really painful now.
For many tasks, one screen is enough/better, but sometimes it makes things a lot easier when you can look at them without having to rearrange your windows.
[1] Imagine something like this: https://future99.en.alibaba.com/product/60091134705-80040621...
I have bad eyes, and use HUGE fonts and can basically only get 1 window per monitor... so I have 3 monitors setup: middle for editor left for browser/docs right for email, slack, irc
Portrait 1080x1920 22" Dell. Landscape 4K LG. Landscape 4K LG. Plus the macbook pro screen, but I hardly ever put stuff on it.
I'm not a fan of the LG monitors I got, model "27UD68-W" in 27 inch. The standby light is bright white and flashes slowly, you have to switch the screen off to stop it. Which is a huge #firstworldproblem, I know, but no other monitor I've used has done this.
I wish I had gotten a higher-refresh-rate screen with less than 4k resolution. Would really like to play some games at faster than 60fps.
I find using a dark themes for everything really helps...Maybe I'm returning to my roots, but I use a lot of Ambers, Greens and Yellows for good contrast without blinding myself. If your a VI(m) user, I found the 'elflord' colorscheme comes pre-installed on a lot of machines (just ':colorscheme elflord' to try it..) Its a decent starting point.
On the other hand, I never seem to have enough light on my workbenches. I've fallen in love with ultra-bright LED fixtures from Home Depot for work area lighting... Dam screws get smaller ever year! (extendable magnetic 'wand' is awesome for finding them when you drop them...)
> I'm not a fan of the LG monitors I got, model "27UD68-W" in 27 inch.
I run 3 x LG 27UK650_600. Most of my gaming tends to be MMORPG stuff, so I don't need anything more then 60Hz. But I am wondering how they'll handle CyberPunk 2077
For what it is worth, not too long ago I came across the concept of “portable monitors”. Took a risk on a 4K 15” model and it ended up being decent quality. Skinnier than a #2 pencil and perfect size when propped next to my 15” MBP, without getting in the way.
edit: Almost forgot to mention this — it is powered via USB-C cable. One end to the monitor and the other into my 15” MBP (13” MBP may not have enough “juice” to power).
This.
I had the same realization maybe 7 or 8 years ago and it is true for me. With multiple monitors it's like moving your hands away from the keyboard all the time and looking for the mouse. Same happens for me while looking for anything across the 2 or 3 monitor setup. It just weakens your focus... If I'm on a laptop (and I usually am), I just use the laptop's screen. Getting used to a different screen size while working with my laptop setup would also slightly slow me down when I'm bound to use only the laptop.