It stands for manufacturer's suggested retail price, but I guess your point stands because it is only a _suggested_ price. Still, I can't remember ever being charged more than MSRP, although perhaps it's happened without me noticing.
It’s like how a 20oz bottle of Diet Coke might cost $1.00 in a small town, $1.25 on average, and $2.00 or even $2.25 in NYC.
In some cities, they're required to give the customer the item for free if the price at the register doesn't match what's on the product or on the shelf. My grandmother was notorious for holding up checkout lines for this reason.
Citation (Wal-Mart): https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/03/21/wal-mart-to-pay-2...
Citation (Walgreens): https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/walgreens-to-pay-m...
Citation (Whole Foods): https://www.organicauthority.com/buzz-news/whole-foods-marke...
Citation (Best Buy): https://www.cnbc.com/id/18846852
I could easily pull up several hundred more, but I'm on a VPN routed to another country and having a hard time getting U.S. news results.
"Consumers should feel confident that the price on the shelf will be the same price they are charged at the cash register,” said Attorney General Harris. “Californians who shop at Wal-Mart should know that they have the right to ask for the appropriate discount.”
Are you under the impression that the attorney general of California is making up consumer rights that do not exist as law?
"12024.2. (a) It is unlawful for any person, at the time of sale of a commodity, to do any of the following: (1) Charge an amount greater than the price, or to compute an amount greater than a true extension of a price per unit, that is then advertised, posted, marked, displayed, or quoted for that commodity. (2) Charge an amount greater than the lowest price posted on the commodity itself or on a shelf tag that corresponds to the commodity, notwithstanding any limitation of the time period for which the posted price is in effect."
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...
a) agree to sell at the advertised price (legal)
b) agree to sell only at a higher price (illegal)
c) refuse to sell
If they choose (c), then they're not in violation of the excerpt you quoted, as they're not 'charging' at all.
Without getting into the competency of the current holder of that office...
What you are quoting is criminal law for retail in general. Certain chains that have a track record of overcharging are under consent decrees that specify protections for consumers that go beyond regular law, such as a free first item.
I've no idea what led you to this, nor why you quoted and posted something unrelated to the charge that you've yet to show any law that requires sellers to GIVE THE CONSUMER THE ITEM, FREE OF CHARGE, when mislaeled.
Airlines got especially busted for price advertisements, and are now required to abide by Federal laws written JUST FOR THEM regarding their pricing advertising practices - 14 CFR § 399.84
This isn't because the airlines were/are particularly egregious about false advertising, but, because the cost of a ticket is a particularly complicated equation and what, exactly, should be required to be included in a displayed price needed to be harmonized across the entire industry and I would perhaps argue needs to be harmonized further.
E.g. Delta sells a ticket on a route for $500 all-inclusive. Southwest advertises the same ticket for $300 but doesn't include $300 in taxes/fees/surcharges/whatever in that price. The Southwest ticket is more expensive but in the absence of standardization of what must be included in the advertised price, neither is inherently right or wrong.
The whole system there probably requires some updating now too, with some carriers now doing things like not including any checked baggage, or not including reserved seating.
Are you required by law to price match?
I think morally we should agree that there is a difference between fraudulent pricing and price errors. Are you actually in violation if you accidentally advertise or label an incorrect price?
Some states, yes, even for a minor glitch in pricing.
Basically: First item free if under $10, or gets a $10 discount, rest of items of same product at lowest price. Does not apply if lowest price is 50% or lower than the highest price (which seems too high to me, given that there are legitimate sales at that markdown level.)
For a while, my closest grocery store (part of a local chain) was terrible at keeping pricing information up to date. Occasionally I'd get surprise discounts, but more frequently I'd get charged too much instead. I was going to buy those things anyway, but on the principle of not letting the store screw people over, I started being a stickler about it. And guess what? The store shaped up.
(I assume the mechanism was that the increase in the number of price overrides at the register caused a review, and the store manager allocated more employee-hours to keeping prices in order, instead of treating it as an optional task.)
In all cases the customer was entitled to the lowest advertised price, be that in our flyer or the shelf. Rarely was the issue flyers. Most common cause of mis-marked prices was a stocker not updating the listed price on the shelf. Or an old price tag getting left behind the new price, and thus disappearing.
If anything this was a quality check, it gave the store a chance to catch mistakes without burning customers.
One source of supposed fraud was price tag printers getting left out. In theory a customer could use the printers to print up their own fake price tags, then request the fake price. Hence lectures from security on never leaving printers on shelf's unattended.
https://www.educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/price-labelling-and-a...
One of the exboyfriend of my sister was using this law to much to get cheap movies for free at Walmart.
I was younger and didn’t press the issue. Now that I’m older I would’ve pressed the issue and grabbed the whole cooler but I don’t really want to get someone fired.
Who would you complain to if they refused to let you buy it?
Your state attorney general. It usually has a consumer fraud department for this sort of thing. If your city is large enough, there may be an equivalent city office.
For things like gas, it's often the county or state department of weights and measures.
Why? Genuinely curious.
I'm in turn genuinely curious how this is not obvious.
Would you be comfortable doing the same to someone who accidentally omitted a zero on their used car sales price on Craigslist?
Advertised by whom? If you mean advertised by the very store in which the customer is trying to purchase the good, that makes a lot of sense (in view of consumer protection /truth in advertising).
However, the previous comment was about the MSRP - the manufacturer suggested retail price. While that's not an average per se, neither is it a mandatory limit. As the name suggests, it's a suggestion.
> I once had a customer complain that an item rang up higher than the MSRP printed on it.
They would have to put a sticker on top of that then.
None of the links in your reply support the statement "In most American states the customer is entitled, by law, to the lowest advertised or marked price. The store must honor that price."
"12024.2. (a) It is unlawful for any person, at the time of sale of a commodity, to do any of the following: (1) Charge an amount greater than the price, or to compute an amount greater than a true extension of a price per unit, that is then advertised, posted, marked, displayed, or quoted for that commodity. (2) Charge an amount greater than the lowest price posted on the commodity itself or on a shelf tag that corresponds to the commodity, notwithstanding any limitation of the time period for which the posted price is in effect."
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...
Westchester County, New York:
"3. It shall be a violation of this code: a. To stamp, tag, label or otherwise mark any item of consumer goods at a selling price greater than the selling price advertised or displayed for that item. b. To stamp, tag, label or otherwise mark more than one (1) selling price upon an item of consumer goods offered for sale in Westchester County unless the prior selling price is unmistakably deleted or obliterated or is otherwise marked so as to indicate clearly the prior selling price is not the current selling price. c. To sell or offer for sale any consumer goods or services at a greater price than the price displayed or advertised therefor."
https://consumer.westchestergov.com/consumer-laws/consumer-c...
Edit: Apparently it is two long words instead: Unverbindliche Preisempfehlung
A very patient man then, I would have asked you why you thought an acronym beginning with M stood for average.