Re:Google, but for colors
by shawn on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:40PM
(#17871152)
In case anyone is wondering how this works, it does a google image search and then extracts the primary color of each result. That’s why you see unexpected colors like grey for “heart”: image search returns black and white hearts.
Re:Google, but for colors
by starshadowx2 on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:49PM
(#17871246)
My first search for "apple" gives you a bunch of greys and a red is only the 8th result. There's more grey, beige, a blue, black, yellow, orange, but only one green and 5 reds total.
Searching "heart" at least gives you a red first and majority reds.
Re:Google, but for colors
by RobertRoberts on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @11:16PM
(#17873879)
Try "apples instead", all red and a single lime green.
It's amusing having a background in software development and this is the first thought I had. (like many here I am sure would) I don't know exactly "why" this works, but knowing that it likely would before trying. (like hitting refresh when your web app barfs)
Someone else suggested cause of the apple logo... and it seems they are likely right. :)
Re:Google, but for colors
by tptacek on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @06:43PM
(#17872732)
You can type nonsense words into this --- words for which Google will say no page in its entire corpus has a match --- and get color palettes back. What's it actually doing?
Re:Google, but for colors
by alangpierce on Thursday August 30, 2018 @01:28AM
(#17874276)
Looks like Google image search always has a fallback for a nonsense search query, and the images between Google and Picular exactly match (if you hover over the bottom-right of any color card, it shows the source image):
My guess is you're still doing a Google Image search, but when it returns no results, you return something random and cache this query for consistency. Is that about right?.
Re:Google, but for colors
by chrbarrol on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @07:39PM
(#17873012)
I was kinda disappointed when I realized when you search it seems to basically only do a simple image search (ala Google) and return the primary color of the individual images, as can be seen by hovering over the small icon in each color result.
I would not really call that machine learning, since it's basically an image search engine with a color filter.
...some of those four letter words won't return results, even if they do exist. Probably because they (futurememories.se) don't want to associate their product with lewd profanity, if/when people start sharing random links on social media.
Re:Google, but for colors
by splatzone on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @02:54PM
(#17870671)
This is really cool, nice work!
I tried 'horse' (https://picular.co/horse) and I got some interesting results, some sky and grassy colours as well. Where do you get the photos from, and will searches give the same results every time or do they vary?
Re:Google, but for colors
by anonytrary on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:44PM
(#17871184)
It's funny because if you scroll through Google images fast enough, you will catch glimpse of monochromatic placeholder images for images that haven't loaded yet. The placeholder image seems to be the average color (maybe with some object boxing to reduce contributions from backgrounds and such) inside the image. This website is kind of the opposite in that it presents the placeholder color as if it were the content itself.
Re:Google, but for colors
by teolandon on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:22PM
(#17870949)
Seems to be doing a google image search and take the average color. Meh.
EDIT: My "meh" is not bashing on the author or anything, at least they actually made a project, all I've done this past while is browse HN and make half-baked terminal apps. It was more of a let-down because I thought this was a very cool idea and was interested in a sophisticated implementation of it.
Re:Google, but for colors
by tomcam on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @03:22PM
(#17870944)
Neat! No greens returned in https://picular.co/christmas but OTOH I just created palettes called Retro and Grunge for a recent project and they were quite similar to Picular’s choices
Re:Google, but for colors
by irrational on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @05:56PM
(#17872425)
I searched blue and it returned some tan and green colors (but not bluish green or greenish blue).
I searched naked, expecting skin colors (I was wondering if it would tend to show "white" skin colors instead of a range of skin colors). The results were... strange.
Re:Google, but for colors
by joe5150 on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @06:28PM
(#17872625)
if you search "skin" you get more or less anticipated results. I think it's using safesearch-filtered results, so "naked" isn't likely to return any actual naked bodies.
Re:Google, but for colors
by martyvis on Thursday August 30, 2018 @07:00AM
(#17875652)
If you are really looking for colours and palettes with a theme you are much better off with the groupthink at sites like https://www.colourlovers.com/
Re:Google, but for colors
by unfunco on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @05:03PM
(#17872011)
Nice. I tried Formula 1 constructors, and all those that I tried matched their liveries. Force India returned some pinks, Ferrari returned some reds, and McLaren some orange.
Re:Google, but for colors
by keithnz on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @11:13PM
(#17873866)
well, I just tried https://picular.co/hackernews which gives lots of orange, but doesn't seem to give me the color I get when I use a color picker on the top bar of FD6423
Re:Google, but for colors
by DonHopkins on Wednesday August 29, 2018 @09:30PM
(#17873487)
I typed in "Trump News" and I got a bunch of Fake Colors, none of which were anything like the correct shade of orange. They're shadow banning orange colors and right wing red colors, only showing dark left wing blue shades!!! Why are they censoring all the warm positive Trump colors??? All colors matter!!!
I put in some scientific proteins, and it spits out their common fluorescence staining colors:
ZO1 (stain tight-junctions, often blue): https://picular.co/zo1 (see https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1399&bi...)
hN1 (a protein usually stained red or green with GFP or mCherry): https://picular.co/hn1 (see https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/HN1-Antibody-P...)
Searching "heart" at least gives you a red first and majority reds.
It's amusing having a background in software development and this is the first thought I had. (like many here I am sure would) I don't know exactly "why" this works, but knowing that it likely would before trying. (like hitting refresh when your web app barfs)
Someone else suggested cause of the apple logo... and it seems they are likely right. :)
https://www.google.com/search?q=apple&tbm=isch
Shows the "holes" in this method.
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj
https://picular.co/sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj
If you put it in quotes, though, Google gives no results and Picular crashes (500 internal server error from an XHR):
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q="sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj...
https://picular.co/"sdlkfjsldkfjsldfkj"
My guess is you're still doing a Google Image search, but when it returns no results, you return something random and cache this query for consistency. Is that about right?.
I would not really call that machine learning, since it's basically an image search engine with a color filter.
I wonder if it's just automatically accepting the spelling suggestion Google provides for searches?
Perhaps custom search displays differing results?
The fact that it works for non existing search results shows that it's ML
If you try linking to https://picular.co/four+letter+words
...some of those four letter words won't return results, even if they do exist. Probably because they (futurememories.se) don't want to associate their product with lewd profanity, if/when people start sharing random links on social media.
Edit: Left a search running for 10 minutes and got some colors.
I tried 'horse' (https://picular.co/horse) and I got some interesting results, some sky and grassy colours as well. Where do you get the photos from, and will searches give the same results every time or do they vary?
pretty neat to search for the planets as well (e.g. https://picular.co/jupiter)
I also like that the favicon changes colors. Nice touch.
One should object, however, that the site returns colors for 'hadron' and 'meson' :).
It might be ordering the results by hue.
Not so vivid: https://picular.co/noir
In the bottom right of each color is a button that reveals the image where the color is sourced from.
EDIT: My "meh" is not bashing on the author or anything, at least they actually made a project, all I've done this past while is browse HN and make half-baked terminal apps. It was more of a let-down because I thought this was a very cool idea and was interested in a sophisticated implementation of it.
Sadly, I couldn't find any playable version of it.
[0]: https://www.onlymelbourne.com.au/guess-the-google
For christmas this seems to be the case.
I wonder what kind of magic is going on under the hood.
I searched naked, expecting skin colors (I was wondering if it would tend to show "white" skin colors instead of a range of skin colors). The results were... strange.
https://picular.co/oscarhealth https://picular.co/yeukhon
That being said, personally, I would prefer something original instead of "Google, but for colors.". just my two cents.
I do not think it uses any AI/ML, the beauty is in the simplicity of the solution. Awesome!
https://www.colourlovers.com/palettes/search?query=love
http://www.color-hex.com/color-palettes/?keyword=love
There are some other sites that do similar searches as well, just can't remember them off the top of my head :)
return "beardyw's house"
But maybe it's just hug of death..
the machine has lots to learn.