As for me, I'm just happy to be running Firefox as a daily driver again.
Personally I'd be happy to see Firefox have tab feature chrome natively has:
- Scroll wheel to move between tabs (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285812)
- Ctrl+1 (2, 3, ...) to jump to a tab. Ctrl+0 to jump to the last tab. [Edit: This works with Alt, nvm!]
- Multi-select tab management (Ctrl+Click, Shift+Click to select, drag, snap and move multiple tabs)
Back when Firefox initially got a lot of market share, its killer feature was tabs. It almost feels like they forgot that :(
Ctrl+1 (2, 3, ...) to jump to a tab.
works for me, Ctrl+0 doesn't
- Multiple-row tab bar.
Such an obvious improvement over tabs scrolling off the screen sides or squashing them like Chrome does, I don't know why it's not being considered.
It's already been done by Tab Mix Plus (or was it Classic Theme Restorer?). They only need to copy it and polish it a little.
Personally I don't find tree-style tabs appealing at all because (1) I usually have few pages open on the same domain, but I have many pages open on different domains. And (2) I don't want a vertical column of content width lost to a sidebar.
Limiting tabs to a single row per window is awful for usability.
You have to understand that this is a pretty unusual concern. Most of the world struggles with screens with aspect ratios optimized for watching TV, making vertical space very precious but leaving plenty of excess horizontal space that cannot be effectively used by the majority of web pages that only use a single column of text.
You are right about that. I use two external monitors, one of which is rotated 90°. Guess which one I keep my browser window on? :)
You could try the Multiple Tab Handler[1] extension. It seems a bit clunky and limited if you use it alone, but it integrates well with Tree Style Tabs [2]. Note that you could open the vertical tabs sidebar when you need to manage tabs and close it right after. You can also disable the "tree" feature of tree style tabs.
[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/multiple-tab-han...
[2] https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/tree-style-tab/
For users that are okay with the common way browsers work, all this new stuff is great though. Firefox Quantum is so fast and it still delivers all of the mainstream add-on functionality.
I'm firmly in the second camp. Give me any browser that I can install uBlock in (and hide most buttons except back and forward), and I'm good to go. With Quantum, I switched over all my browsing to Firefox. Including on Android, which hasn't even had most the Quantum improvements yet (its UI has just gotten a much needed update).
With this change, Firefox targets the lowest common denominator just like every other major browser (tracing the footsteps of Chrome). In the progress, it too, is becoming just like Chrome.
This whole saga begun back when Opera dropped support for their 12.x browser, and became just another Blink-based browser. At that point, the only way to get a usable browser (with vertical tabs, MRU tab switching, gestures) was Firefox with a number of addons (Tree Style Tab, Tab Mix Plus, Firegestures).
One may argue that users like this should just use a fringe browser with such features built-in, but that's not viable because they're either unstable or lack timely security updates.
You may also argue that you can get all those features, even in Firefox 57, but that's only true with caveats:
Tree Style Tab still exists, but if you use either the history or bookmark sidebars, you better get ready to switch back and forth all the time (since only one sidebar can be active at a time).
The about:config setting browser.ctrlTab.previews (now also exposed in preferences as "Ctrl+Tab cycles through tabs in recently used order") is mostly useless, since it is limited to the 6 most recent tabs (probably even fewer on lower resolution screens).
There are several mouse gesture addons for Firefox 57, but none of them currently work on Linux/Mac. Even on Windows (and the others when they're fixed), gestures will work neither on internal pages nor on addons.mozilla.org.
It's likely available from your package manager.
It's a shame tradeoffs are necessary, but I think it's worth highlighting that it's a tradeoff that also brings substantial advantages. For all users, including the power users.
Things that bother me on desktop developer edition:
* no usable mouse gestures extension
* constantly changing UI
* hid really useful things like file/edit/history/bookmarks/tools menu behind
holding alt button on Ubuntu.
Pretty sure that whole menu will be gone soon.
* it's impossible to clear for example last week, last month etc of browsing data (not sure if you could do it before).
In fact, I'm not sure if I can clear cookies but not site history anymore after spending 5 minutes in the settings.
* tree-style tabs turned into something unusable
* getting rid of all the rare extensions that worked previously and are no longer supported by the original author
* tons of greasemonkey userscripts broken
* greasemonkey a lot less usable now (still can't figure out how to write a custom script from scratch)
Unfortunately, on desktop I'm stuck between this new FFX and Vivaldi. On mobile, I already switched to Brave even though it's terrible because you can't easily google for selected text or select a part of a paragraph easily.
But couple of your annoyances can be fixed rather easily:
1. Get back the toolbar back: View (or Alt-V) - Toolbars - Menu Bar
2. To clean recent history: Ctrl-Shift-Del will give you the clean recent history dialog box. It can be accessed from toolbar too: History - Clear recent history.
Weird that the only way to get to that menu is through a toolbar that's not visible by default.
What's unusable about the new tree style tabs? I use it constantly.
If you want old greasemonkey scripts to work without changes, use violentmonkey.
There must be a bug with the new greasemonkey that I can't find the editor either. Use violentmonkey for that too for now.
I'll grant that the new responsiveness of FF makes TST feel much better. But there's one thing that's constantly giving me headaches. I don't feel like the highlighting given to the currently-selected tab is in-your-face enough, so that I'm always scanning up and down the tree trying to see which one it is. The other formatting options it used have were nice, but being able to at least make the selected tab's title bold was a big deal for me.
I realize that this is technically possible in the new regime via userChrome.css. However, the element classes are completely undocumented so I have no idea how to accomplish it.
Before FF57, I was able to set the font and background color for tabs depending on their status (current, inactive, unread, etc.), and that's what I want now. IIRC, this was actually a feature of Tab Mix Plus.
It's clear that this is still possible even without TMP, but requires putting code in userChrome.css. That would be fine with me, if I could just find any documentation on what element classes (or whatever would be the most appropriate selectors) I need to reference.
document.querySelector('#sidebar')._contentWindow[0].document.querySelectorAll('.tab.active')[1] https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab/wiki/Code-snippets-fo...
With tree style tabs I didn't realize there is a CSS hack to remove the top tabs.
It takes 12s after launch for my newtab to populate with icons -- which incidentally I dislike compared to the previous page thumbnails -- there's regular stalling when it fails to respond.
I'm prepared to give some space to get acclimated to new versions, there were font problems on lots of pages (including newtab) for me which I've worked through. But I'm failing to see any benefit yet - even then turning the icon super bright has annoyed me ...
Obviously there's something slowing down your Firefox, but it's definitely not to do with how modern your hardware is because 57 is noticeably faster than the previous version on my 2011 MacBook.
browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.enabled = false
browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.feeds.section.topstories = false
browser.newtabpage.enhanced = false
browser.newtabpage.enabled = true
seems to respect my 5 columns and 3 rows with large preview icons.
And on the "improvements" side -- I have to say I've never felt the browser was too slow. Sometimes the network is lousy, sometimes stupid websites are terrible, but the browser itself has been just fine for me for years. So I'd rather have had a less painful and abrupt transition, which maybe took a bit longer.
For security reasons, yes.
For people who don't want to say bye to old extensions which are not (or cannot) be ported to 57+ there is the option to stick with 52 ESR version (Extended Support Release). According to Mozilla FAQ [1] this version gets obselete in march 8 by Firefox 59 ESR.
[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/tree-style-ta... and look through teh list til you find something that supports FF52+
I'm a little concerned that any bugs/holes in extensions will be left open though, since it's very unlikely the extension devs are going to be backporting features/fixes.
Ditto re: weird css hacks to hide the top bar.
Iirc, they decided to move it out of the browser and in to an add-on, which is frustrating in light of the recent changes. Don't get me wrong, I'm for the migration to WebExtensions, but it's annoying that there wasn't a better path for a feature that used to be a part of the browser.
Here's hoping most of this will be resolved in the upcoming months.
Firefox plans to add an API for dynamically hiding the tabbar. You can follow progress here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1332447