News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by thatfrenchguy on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:16AM (#15373215)
As a French person: stop subsidizing corn, start subsidizing vegetables, stop eating take-out.

If you look at a middle-class supermarket in France and in the US you understand why your poor are obese pretty quickly.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by jdavis703 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:32AM (#15373311)
The food we have in the U.S., particularly in low-income areas is atrocious. However there are a lot of excuses being made about obesity, including that it's caused by poverty. Yes poverty is a component, but the obesity epidemic is striking all income groups, with no particular correlation to income [0]. It's more about the diet and exercise choices that people choose to make, include the middle class and upper class who most definitely have the ability to make choices around the food and beverages they consume.

Further many of the most wasteful calories are not caused by high-sodium, high-fat processed foods but by excess sugar consumption in the form of sugary drinks. Switching to water, black coffee, or unsweetened tea could help the "Big Gulp" demographic big time.

0: http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullart...

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Mz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:43AM (#15373370)
Almost everyone in the US is a prisoner of their car. Our built environment presumes that you have a car. We make it very challenging to live without one. And then we have to listen to Stephen Hawking be judgy about how we "choose" to not be active, which he can't understand from his wheelchair.

Most Americans are confined to a wheeled chair for many hours a week. We just call it a car, but good luck getting free of it.

(I have lived without a car for about a decade, so this comment is not expressing discontent with me feeling trapped. I escaped that trap and walking everywhere has helped me shed a lot of weight without intending to.)

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by headmelted on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:54PM (#15373746)
We switched to one family car around 7 years ago, as I quickly realized it would be a lot less hassle and expense for me to just use public transportation to get into the city.

Fast-forward to now and I'm seriously contemplating buying another car (which I am utterly loath to do), solely because of how unreliable public transport is in my part of the world.

Besides the above, I had a conversation with a cyclist in work earlier this week who is considering giving it up and going back to driving (also against his will) because he finds it hard to breathe with all the diesels on the road that have had the particulate filters ripped out (a law that is completely ignored here, so is commonplace).

(As a side note, if you're wondering how he knows which cars have had this done, Google "coal-rolling" and you'll understand quickly.)

This is far more nuanced (and ridiculous) than people understand. While it might be healthy in the US to walk and cycle rather than drive, in Europe it's borderline hazardous.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by sametmax on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:52AM (#15373439)
Half of the problem is not the infrastructure, but peoples priorities and the public perception of the pros/cons of a car. Also the value of the car as a symbol.

A couple will make 3 kids and say "I can't do without a car". But the couple never ponder the cost of making a family. The fact or having a car or not, and other matters of life style, are an after thoughs. And if you raise the issue, you are a cold robot for thinking that way instead of with your "heart".

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Mz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:05PM (#15373507)
The vast majority of human babies are the result of either "Whoops! Babies happen!" or "We tried for years for this one!" The families that try for years tend to have one or two kids, not three or more. The people with many children who complain of being trapped typically have a lot of other things going on that lead to them having too little control over their lives.

I am super uncomfortable with statements that suggest people just need to exercise some self control and stop cranking out babies. That position is incredibly dismissive of very complex issues, including lack of access to health care in the US. Historically, health insurance that paid for Viagra did not pay for female birth control. We have this underlying assumption that men have a right to get laid, even if they need chemical help to get it up, but women do not. Yet, most of those men are getting laid with women, not with other men.

Questions of reproduction and sexual morality are incredibly complex and a very touchy subject because when two people have sex where the result may be a child, there are a great many people impacted. It isn't as simple as her rights vs his. The rights of the child are an issue, but so are the rights of the rest of society.

It really isn't a discussion I care to see injected here.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by sillysaurus3 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:19PM (#15373569)
A couple will make 3 kids and say "I can't do without a car". But the couple never ponder the cost of making a family.

This is simply mistaken. The cost of making a family is nearly always what people are thinking about in that situation.

If you're saying that people aren't careful enough when they have sex, then yeah, that's always been a problem. But what's to be done? The kids exist now and you need to provide for them. Now what?

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by watwut on Sunday October 01, 2017 @07:09AM (#15377290)
The complain here is about practicality of car vs bicycle/walk. What does that have with cost of making a familly? They don't complain about car being expensive.

And no, in many places in USA a car is just about the only way how to get kids to school. Which you have to. And yep, cycling along unsafe road when you are adult and when you are 8 is not the same. So ype, familly with children needs car more then single healthy adult.

And yep, unless you want to face aging population problem later on, 3 kids should be doable. Just to get replacement level of population.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by mrhappyunhappy on Saturday September 30, 2017 @06:52PM (#15375401)
I agree, culture is part of the problem - the car culture. That and people have forgotten what real food looks like.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:17PM (#15373559)
Its effecting all income levels, but I suspect not evenly. The pattern I see (which is anecdotal) is higher income people appear healthier (i.e., are on average less overweight).

Sometimes I wonder if that's cause or correlation. That is, ill and wealthy just don't go together.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by SolaceQuantum on Saturday September 30, 2017 @01:07PM (#15373815)
I am rich enough to not need a second job, of which the time I have not working allows me to educate myself on nutrition and cook for myself regularly.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Mz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:25PM (#15373592)
There is a complex relationship there that can be summed up pithily as "Them that has, gets."
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:39PM (#15373656)
But has is also a function of decisions, which is also related to knowledge / awareness. No doubt, lower income areas have less / worse selection. But that kinda doesn't explain why the better off don't choose and consume those same things as they are just as available to them.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Mz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:45PM (#15373687)
Like I said: It's complicated.

I am a strange mix of privilege and poverty. I was in gifted programs in public school and I have six years of college. I also am a woman and I have serious health issues.

I am getting healthier and I am getting more well off as a consequence. I think a lot about the details of the very complex relationship between health and wealth.

It is a really complicated thing that cannot be pinned down to any one thing. Education, social fabric, enhanced personal agency, greater de facto rights and a whole raft load of stuff tends to be involved in who is both rich and healthy and who gets access to neither.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @05:52PM (#15375169)
I do agree with you. There's no magic bullet. But I still have a hard time comprehending why soda is a good choice. Even juat switching to water would make a difference. I think.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Mz on Saturday September 30, 2017 @06:07PM (#15375228)
Some sodas have medicinal effects. I have a genetic disorder, so my diet is absolutely not the root cause of my health issues. I was diagnosed late in life. That empowered me to finally start getting healthier. With getting healthier, I consume less diet coke.

A couple of excerpts from my food blog:

I basically live on diet coke. Coca cola products contain extract from the coca plant. This has medicinal benefits. No other cola products have this. Other cola products tend to be mostly sugar water -- though I do sometimes drink ginger ale because ginger helps with nausea.

http://miceats.blogspot.com/2016/09/diet-coke.html

Plain water has been gradually creeping into my diet here lately. This is noteworthy because I rarely drank plain water for quite a few years.

http://miceats.blogspot.com/2017/01/plain-water.html

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by slowmovintarget on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:15PM (#15373552)
Bad food, far too little sleep, and sedentia... the perfect trifecta to cause depression, anxiety and obesity (and later diabetes, heart disease and Alzheimers).
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:22PM (#15373581)
Yup. But, evidently, the cost of healthcare is due to the system. What those critics fail to admit is that the biggest component of that system are the people seeking care, and the average baseline health there of.

Americans want to abuse their bodies (and minds) and expect healthcare to remain cheap. It doesn't work that way. Healthcare resources are limited. Increase demand and prices increases.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by craftyguy on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:26AM (#15373273)
Not just France, but most European countries.. every time I travel in Europe there's always this initial realization that I'm no longer surrounded by obese people. None of the places I've been to over there encourage the same eating habits that you find prevalent in the US.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chrisper on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:43AM (#15373369)
It does not help that in the US (or at least in California) you have to drive everywhere. I live in Europe now, but when I lived in the US I barley walked anywhere since it was just too far.

In Europe I do not even own a car anymore. Most things can be done with a bike, by foot, or by public transport. For a few things where I prefer a car, I just use car sharing. So now I am way more active every day.

And thanks to certain trains always be running late, I am running at least once a day as well!

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by tomp on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:51AM (#15373424)
Don't worry, obesity rates are going up in Europe as well, so we'll soon be just like the US!
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by jdavis703 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:38AM (#15373345)
Well portion sizes are smaller, but most people walk, bike or transit to work. For example this week I haven't done any exercise due to a "sports"-related injury, and yet managed to burn an average of 2571 calories -- and before you think I'm lucky to live near work, my one-way commute is 30 miles. Even just 40 minutes of daily physical activity built into a commute can make a huge difference.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by craftyguy on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:45AM (#15373386)
Oh yea, totally. I bicycle to work almost every day (it's ~6 mi one way), but I'm lucky enough to live in a location with decent cycling infrastructure. I think another aspect of why most folks drive here (the US) is because a lot of locations have little or no infrastructure for getting around without a car. In the area where I am originally from (different part of US), you'd get smashed by cars pretty fast because you'd be forced to travel on highways/freeways.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by 21 on Saturday September 30, 2017 @04:10PM (#15374780)
Besides different eating habits, one of the reasons is that there is a huge stigma of being obese in most of Europe. The fact that it is relatively rare makes any such person stand out even more, and makes it harder to justify (since your peers somehow manage to keep their weight in check)
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by sametmax on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:49AM (#15373408)
Not sure we should be giving advice. Our situation has worsen during the last 15 years. The quality of food is going down (and the prices for good food up), the health habits are too. Not in the same proportion of the US yet, but it's significant.

Compared to my parents or grand parent generation, the new ones:

- spend much more time seated;

- spend much more time in front of a screen;

- have much less people knowing how to cook. Or choose tasty fruits or vegetable for that matters, and hence they believe good food taste like crap.

- have more fat people, especially young ones;

- eat less home made food;

- consume more cereals, dairies, meat and refined sugar and less vegetables or fruits;

- eat more, and more often;

- consume products with less nutritional density, and a bigger concentration of additives of all sorts;

- eat while doing something else, faster, with less mastication.

So clearly our society is starting to fail on the health part as well.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by thatfrenchguy on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:04PM (#15373500)
Source here ?
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by Simon_says on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:15PM (#15373555)
Source: I know it. You know it. Everybody knows it.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by simplyluke on Saturday September 30, 2017 @11:43AM (#15373374)
I think it's a deeper cultural issue than that.

Look at how much more expensive cigarettes are in France and the graphical warning labels that accompany them and then look at how much more commonplace smoking is in France, particularly among the youth. Regulations don't change cultures to nearly the effect many want them to.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:13PM (#15373545)
Yes and no. I live in the USA. I shop in a few different supermarket each catering to a particular class (if you will). Mind you, the overall selection reflects the income level the store serves. But that doesn't completely explain what goes into the carts.

Long to short, I'm not so sure the less well to do are making decisions that keep them healthy. Soda, ice cream, sugary cereals, etc. These things are in the upper class stores aw well, but it seem less people are interested.

I agree with you. But I want to added that the consumers' choices factor in as well.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by egwynn on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:20PM (#15373572)
The way I’ve heard it explained is that poor people will base their grocery purchases based on price, and that gets to GP’s point about not subsidizing corn. The reasoning goes: cheap corn leads to low-end food being filled with corn syrup, which leads to poor people eating tons of sugar, which leads to health problems among poor people. The solution, under this scheme, is to help steer the schedule of food prices so that it’s cheaper for people to eat healthy food (eliminate corn subsidies).
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by chiefalchemist on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:46PM (#15373699)
Agree 100%!

In fact approx 10+ yrs ago the NY Times Sunday mag ran an article that said what you just did. In short, corn subsidies lead to cheap sweeteners, and those to cheap (but frutose based) foods.

Ironic that cities (e.g., Philadelphia) have a (so called) sugar drink tax" but their tax dollars (via subsidies) were already used to lower the cost of those drinks. Ultimately, the consumer pays. The consumer always pays.

Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by ashark on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:42PM (#15373676)
Upper classes are socialized against sweet=good. That helps.
Re:Is she Photoshopped? In France, they now have to tell you by hrktb on Saturday September 30, 2017 @12:22PM (#15373584)
What does eating take-out have to do with obesity ?