News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by tyingq on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:01AM (#13037591)
Amazon is now at 50% of sales being third party listings.

Aside from the review mess, the quality level of the 3rd party listing themselves, customer service, shipping speed, and products...is really hurting them. And, of course, separately, the issue of counterfeit products.

My non-techie friends are taking notice.

Amazon really needs to deep dive into this before they hurt their brand in a way that's hard to recover.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by bambax on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:47PM (#13038465)
Yes, but the problem is they are still actively encouraging so-called "private label" items.

I became a seller on Amazon two months ago, because I'm developing new (unique) products and I thought it would be simpler to have them distributed by Amazon.

But making said products is taking much longer than anticipated, so in the meantime, and as a learning process, I started selling one product in "private label" mode (ie, a product that I buy "as is" from a Chinese factory, with my brand printed on it). It's kind of selling, although the competition makes it hard/impossible to turn any profit (since all products are virtually identical, competition is on price and maybe listing quality/exhaustivity).

But what is amazing to me is that a service called "Amazon coach" regularly sends emails to encourage me to sell more PL products. Today, Amazon coach recommends selling a meat tenderizer on amazon.de: there are already over 350 different listings for meat tenderizers on amazon.de, how many more do they need???

Some time ago I used to regard the "ships from Amazon" or "Prime" logo as markers for quality, because I figured, somehow, that Amazon did some kind of vetting before accepting a product for shipping. That's completely wrong. The sign only means that the product is stored in their warehouse (and will therefore probably be delivered on time); but it has no meaning whatsoever regarding the quality of the product. There is zero curation.

Selling on Amazon is teaching me to trust Amazon less.

And of course, the ocean of similar products makes shopping much harder; meat tenderizers are not the worst case by far: if you're looking for a corkscrew in the Home & Kitchen category, you're looking at 2,500+ options on amazon.de alone... and 16,000+ on amazon.com!! Crazy.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by mbrookes on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:17PM (#13039142)
> I used to regard the "ships from Amazon" or "Prime" logo as markers for quality

You need to look for (or limit your search to ) "Sold by Amazon". Not so say that Amazon doesn't sell some duff products, and they have some "private label" products of their own (Amazon Basics), but all of those will have had some degree of vetting.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by danudey on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:17PM (#13039529)
Even Apple power adapters sold by Amazon and not by a third party are 90% fake:

https://9to5mac.com/2016/10/19/amazon-fake-apple-chargers-ca...

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nitrogen on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:04PM (#13039812)
Does Amazon commingle third-party stock with their own, or are their vendors selling them fake chargers?

When I was looking at selling my creations on Amazon, they had an option to commingle stock with other sellers of the same item, but I don't know if that includes Amazon's own stock.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by massysett on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:39PM (#13040049)
Yes. They have a webpage somewhere describing this. They do not commingle select categories, such as food. Everything else is fair game for commingling. Sold By Amazon is no guarantee of authenticity or even an indicator that your product came through a legitimate supply chain.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by x0x0 on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:46PM (#13041621)
Amazon will happily continue selling Aukey chargers with fake ETL (UL Labs competitor) marks, even after I notified them of this! You just can't trust amazon for electronics.

Link to my original post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12832605

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by shiven on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:57PM (#13039407)
This. Only if the product is "Shipped from and Sold by Amazon.com" is there a good chance I will buy it. Even at 1.5-2x the lowest price from other vendors (FBA, direct shippers etc.). I'd rather trust Amazon directly than anyone else on amazon.com
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ryanhuff on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:15PM (#13039884)
You certainly pay for that trust. Last week, I found a product that I bought on Amazon was available locally for 11% cheaper. Fast forward to today, I was about to buy something else on Amazon (prime item sold by 3rd party), and decided to check eBay. The manufacturer was selling the item direct on eBay for 30% less. Amazon does provide a lot of protection value to the buyer, but its previous value proposition (save by ordering online), doesn't seem to apply any longer.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by uberrr on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:52PM (#13040125)
I have found that it's always worthwhile to check eBay before making an Amazon purchase.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Peretus on Friday November 25, 2016 @07:31PM (#13040964)
It's true that they will have some vetting-- All products that Amazon sells itself are evaluated through becoming a seller through Vendor Central. Just because a product is labeled as 'Ships from and sold by Amazon' does not mean that it's not a private label product; Vendor Express is available for exactly the purpose of getting vendors to sell directly to Amazon. I am a mid-volume seller on their platform and I probably see 2-3 offers a week from them encouraging me to list my products with them.

Another trick for the best price is to not always go with the buy box by default. Amazon doesn't give up the buy box unless the competitor's price is significantly lower than theirs. It's always worth taking a look at what else is listed in the 'Other sellers' box, especially on products where Amazon is the vendor. It's likely their the cheapest, but that's not always the case.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by notyourwork on Friday November 25, 2016 @09:42PM (#13041398)
This is reminding me of the last few years I used ebay. At first it was great, and by the end I was constantly worried about quality.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nommm-nommm on Saturday November 26, 2016 @12:04PM (#13044612)
The quality listings are easy to find on eBay though and impossible to find on Amazon. eBay still has a lot of quality.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by cptskippy on Saturday November 26, 2016 @08:56PM (#13047276)
Care to elaborate?
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by flippyhead on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:31PM (#13038834)
This has been very enlightening. I buy a ton of stuff on Amazon and have had the same incorrect assumptions.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by 0xcde4c3db on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:31PM (#13039243)
Hear, hear. The thing that messes me up most is probably the category spam (also frequently seen with third-party sellers on Newegg). Just as an example, go into Home & Kitchen:Vacuums & Floor Care:Vacuums:Upright Vacuums. Think you'll find the cheapest upright vacuum cleaners if you sort this category by Lowest Price? Ha ha ha ha. No. First you'll need to go through at least 3 pages of miscellaneous parts, fuses, extension cords, and shop vacs before you even get to the first actual upright vacuum cleaner. Amazon's pagination system makes you do this one page at a time (at least on my browser). This is one of the better categories. Most categories related to cell phones are such fucking disasters that it's hard to even gauge how bad the problem is.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by manyxcxi on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:33PM (#13039626)
It's gotten bad enough that there are entire product categories I completely avoid on Amazon due to the likelihood of counterfeit. If I'm looking for a specific brand of electronics (say, Anker or Apple) I'll buy it off Newegg or direct from a brick and mortar. If I can't be bothered or it's not at the store, I'll order it from that store or manufacturer's website (Home Depot, Fry's, etc.).

For a lot of other things, the price is so close or the exact same, I'll just buy it from the store. I do a lot of woodworking, so I buy a fair amount of stuff from a number of brands that people aren't really counterfeiting (yet)- for those I'll buy using prime, unless it's at one of the woodworking/hardware stores in the area. Then I'll just go get it myself, the prices are always within a small percentage of each other.

It feels like, for me, I do my window shopping at Amazon and execute my purchase locally, just because Amazon has gone downhill for me. I would be interested to know if other people are slowly coming to the behaviors I have.

Pretty much I get random small electronics components that don't need a great level of quality and just random other things that I don't care all that much about quality or origin. They've become my Alibaba in a way.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by massysett on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:44PM (#13040084)
Acutally I trust Anker an Amazon because Anker is running the store, so their reputation is on the line.

I still shop Amazon for many categories, but my guard is always up. But for some categories like apparel, the Amazon experience is so horrible that I don't even think to look there.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by crooked-v on Friday November 25, 2016 @05:24PM (#13040290)
The problem is that Amazon commingles stock, so an Anker-brand X could actually be supplied by company Y and come from counterfeit manufacturer Z.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Friday November 25, 2016 @05:44PM (#13040384)
I just checked a couple of their items, and they say "Sold by AnkerDirect and Fulfilled by Amazon", and it's very much Anker's option to not commingle their inventory, and I would expect they've chosen that option, they have a brand to protect.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by manyxcxi on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:30PM (#13040667)
Anker was probably a bad example because they seem to do a pretty good job and seemingly don't allow commingling of their product.

This discussion does highlight the issue though, we all had to go check, and check a number of different options, and are we still REALLY sure that we're getting an Anker product? Now, if you're my mom and you're not checking the right boxes and looking for the 8pt font of who it's being fulfilled by, what's your success rate with high counterfeit categories?

Bottom line, if I'm buying a brand, there should be NO DOUBT that's what I'm getting. Do you doubt the brand that you're buying when you walk in to Best Buy? I don't. When the prices are the exact same, I'm buying from Best Buy. If the price is significantly lower on Amazon, then I get super suspect about the authenticity.

Just bought a part for my Dyson vacuum cleaner and I found a number of suspect listings before I got the the one that seemed authentic- catalog shots, posting copy, lack of "Engrish". I was completely expecting to have to return it when I got it, but to my relief, it came in an "Authentic Dyson" labeled box and the fit, finish, color, and production seemed exactly the same as what came off my vacuum.

That's too much doubt for my liking.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by x0x0 on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:40PM (#13041604)
How do you know Anker doesn't commingle? I don't think FBA vendors have any control over it.

edit: here is some discussion. FBA vendors appear to have control:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html/ref=hel...

But I still don't think the amazon customer can see if an fba vendor allows commingling.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Saturday November 26, 2016 @06:23AM (#13042977)
I don't know, as I said, "I would expect they've chosen that option, they have a brand to protect." They have a brand so good in this domain they've be absolutely insane to commingle.

But, no, we can't tell if a vendor commingles, we can only infer it in special cases like Anker as manyxcxi noted, or pick out vendors with high ratings and otherwise cross our fingers.

It's a colossal mess, and nowadays, if I'm not buying used books (where I go with < 95% rating and Very Good quality), I find a BS detector honed for decades, literally about 4 and half, is the single most useful tool in navigating their swamps. Which for me confirms they indeed have big problems, and that's not even counting their search engine, which as others have noted is bad; for me, by far the worst I regularly use, and like others I often use Google's instead.

All this implies to me that if AWS wasn't such a money machine, Amazon's stock holders ought to be very nervous. The company really need to get serious about these problems.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by paulmd on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:45PM (#13040755)
This would be less of a problem if the Amazon search weren't so terrible. You should just be able to choose "sold by Amazon" and all those problems go away. "Prime shipping" gets you closer but nowadays a lot of junk is prime shipped too.

At the root, the problem is that Amazon's stock is not discoverable. Their search engine is terrible, I've had situations where I knew the exact listing I wanted and wanted to see if anyone else was listing it cheaper, I searched a few keywords and had the listing I knew about plus a sea of other listings, then I added more words from the listing's title and suddenly the listing no longer appeared in the search results. What in the actual fuck is going on there?

To be honest nowadays I just google search "[item] amazon" because the Amazon search is such utter trash. If it doesn't pop up in the best sellers list and you can't manage to filter down by "prime" and "ratings" it might as well not be there according to Amazon's search, it's just lost in a sea of junk listings. The terrible search is one of the major reasons why nobody buys low-rating items, and that's why people bought ratings in the first place, so really it all comes back to the terrible search.

For starters the results need to be weighted by number of items sold though that listing. The brand new listing from a brand new seller yesterday gets the same weight as the item that's been a #1 bestseller for years. But other stuff, like items going away when you try to narrow down to them... I don't even know what's going on there.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by throwbsidbdk on Friday November 25, 2016 @08:38PM (#13041216)
Amazon has long had a reputation for high engineer turnover and brutal office climate. I wonder if a constant talent bleed is finally manifesting in the quality of their product.

It's pretty bad that some third party startups are offering products to determine if Amazon reviews are likely fake and Amazon with all of their resources doesn't seem to be doing it themselves.

This feels like MySpace all over again. It's clearly possible to build a superior product, in contrast to something like Google who have constantly reinvented themselves to stay on the top of the curve... it doesn't look good..

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Sunday November 27, 2016 @11:42AM (#13050013)
Yeah, the horrible state of their search, which in many cases is clearly costing them serious money, tells me something is wrong with that part of the company, and since it's so critical, it says nothing good about the company as a whole.

Perhaps it's a bad thing they started with books, where counterfeits certainly exist, but aren't quite at the same level of problem, shouldn't be any problem when they were sourcing from that big wholesaler of boos, and ... how long did it take them to enter the used book market with third parties? And, again, that was a well developed market before they entered....

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nkuttler on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:17AM (#13037697)
I recently ordered a cheap product from a vendor in china. As I found out later this vendor has 99% negative reviews that all say the same: money taken, product not delivered, and this has been going on for months. At least I got my money back after a comlaint. I find it unbelievable that you can scam for months and still be a vendor on amazon.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by lol768 on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:51AM (#13037968)
I had almost a completely identical experience. Ordered, waited a month and nothing.

Went to look at the seller's reviews .. and they were all 1/5 negative saying the product was never delivered. The A-Z guarantee got me my money back but I wasn't impressed the seller was allowed to continue doing this for so long.

After I complained, the seller appeared to have all their items removed from Amazon.

As an aside, you can generally trust the FBA items from 3rd party sellers.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by philliphaydon on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:45AM (#13037933)
Not sure why you single China out. It can be any vendor. I bought an intervalometer for my camera for $30 2 weeks ago. Took 8 days. Works great. Done the job. Chinese brand and shipped from china.

Bought some clothes from UK. Never arrived. Amazon refunded.

Amazon is great. But any vendor can be as dodgy as any eBay seller.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by adrianN on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:03PM (#13038077)
Maybe they single out China because they're relaying their personal experience with a seller who happens to be from China.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by taeric on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:14PM (#13038188)
I think the point is that the "from China" is actually unneeded information. Worse, it can help build xenophobia.

Consider, the story is just as powerful with "I ordered from a vendor who had a ton of negative reviews for not delivering products." Even better, that instructs to start paying attention to reviews, and not origin of vendor. :)

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nacho2sweet on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:07PM (#13038648)
Nah man. Amazon is full of crappy quality Aliexpress/Futian Market dropship Chinese vendors. It is an actual problem. Point it out. Stop making lame comments like you feel it is racist.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by throwbsidbdk on Friday November 25, 2016 @05:37PM (#13040360)
China has a well known problem with not honoring other country's intellectual property. I don't see how it's racist at all to comment about the negative effects of a countries IP policies. Were not talking about Chinese here, were talking about the IP government policies of China
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by kbenson on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:38PM (#13038378)
It's rather amazing how when you call out people's preconception they hold strongly, you'll easily get downvoted here, regardless of how well founded or supported that preconception is.

If the original comment had mentioned how the purchase was from a black vendor, or a gay vendor, people would be up in arms about what that unjustly implies, and how without any sort of data to back that it's just stereotyping (at best). Do it for China, where people already have a strong preconception of the types of vendors present, and all that rational separation of anecdote and data and needing to justify your statements goes right out the window.

This isn't to say you can't call out vendors from China if you suspect they are a problem in higher proportions than other vendors. The original comment could have included "I suspect this may be a problem exhibited more often from vendors from China, but don't have data to back that up" or more strong statements with some data, but did not. Instead we have a statement that only adds to the comment when combined with your own preconceptions, since it adds nothing to the circumstances of the described situation without your own preconceptions.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Chris2048 on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:44PM (#13040752)
Ordering from a black/gay vendor is not as unrelated as ordering from a different country, with different consumer laws and regulations.

> rational separation of anecdote and data and needing to justify your statements

No statement was made though. An anecdote simply provided additional data, and you objected on the basis of what people might assume.

> but don't have data to back that up

You might also assume that from no data being provided, and indeed, no claim being made.

> we have a statement that only adds to the comment when combined with your own preconceptions

or allows another thread on the topic to emerge, in this case if it's relevant that China was involved, causing someone with knowledge on the topic to comment.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Retric on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:59PM (#13041650)
There is a huge statistical difference in product quality from Chinese brands. Making this more than just random antidotes. Japan and even the US had a relatively brief period of making low cost crap, but China can't seem to move up the manufacturing quality ladder.

If you manufacture in China you find huge legal and social issues with maintaining quality. It's still possible just far from the default.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Sunday November 27, 2016 @11:31AM (#13049953)
If you manufacture in China you find huge legal and social issues with maintaining quality.

I've read, without adequate if any sourcing, that this is a pattern that's at least centuries old, specifically, building things to the required specs, then backing off on quality until the buyer complains....

If so, it's interesting it survived the harshest decades of Communism and the attempts to do away with the old ways, then again, it could well be aligned with the incentives that were force back then. Although I'd hate to be issued a weapon or ammo that was from a factory running along those quality lines. Although back when we were allowed to buy ammo from the PRC, that sort of thing was not apparent from what I remember, but I'm not sure I would have noticed since I was never in the market for those particularly types.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by setq on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:21PM (#13039166)
This.

RS and Farnell in the UK use parcel force and UPS respectively. The success rate for me is higher on stuff shipped from China.

I've had some stuff from Leeds to London end up in Belgium for two days.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by leoedin on Saturday November 26, 2016 @10:48AM (#13044141)
Farnell seems like a weird vendor to pick out as being slow or unreliable. I've always been amazed by the delivery of stuff I've ordered from Farnell - often you can order it at 7.50pm and it'll be there the next morning. In fact in probably 50+ orders I've never had one go missing or arrive more than a day late.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Chris2048 on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:46PM (#13040757)
But are the mail services comparable? Specific companies versus "China"..
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ethbro on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:36AM (#13037863)
The design of listing supposedly identical products by multiple vendors under the same entry needs to be revisited.

It's great for competition and price pressure, but completely fails when dealing with generic items and vendors aren't held to account for outright fraud.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by setq on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:24AM (#13037765)
Well they have your cash during the time between the purchase and the refund and may have a 20% no complaint rate so it might still pay to let them sell nothing.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by tyingq on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:28AM (#13037796)
They also get a monthly fee from the seller, even if the seller sells zero products.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by dangrossman on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:53AM (#13037984)
The monthly subscription is optional. You can pay $0.99 per sale instead and nothing monthly.

https://services.amazon.com/selling/pricing.htm

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Semaphor on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:06PM (#13039070)
We are showing self-made (because the widgets amazon offers are crap) widgets for the products our articles talk about.

Luckily we have the prices from other merchants to compare the amazon prices to, and could implement a filter for unreasonable prices (way over uvp or way below what other merchants ask for).

Amazon is full of scammers.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by AJ007 on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:11PM (#13038163)
I definitely wrote things making fun of Jet.com, but now I order household goods from there rather than Amazon. I even see a strong appeal of physically going to Target now verse trying to buy sheets from Amazon. On Amazon, for every item you add to your cart you have to consider:

- What is the likelihood this description matches the product being sold?

- Are the reviews real?

- Is this item safe?

- Is the price double what it is from other retailers?

Perhaps Amazon is having a similar moment Google did when Demand Media just obliterated the quality of their search results. It really is going to take a multi-pronged approach to clean things up. Depending on where their cashflow is coming from, this could be a very punishing task.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by eterm on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:41PM (#13038410)
Amazon used to be brilliant because you knew exactly what you were getting. The fast and cheap shipping was a (very nice) bonus.

All my recent purchases have been disappointing, from futons of 'odd' sizes or misleading descriptions, "no assembly required", or products which just aren't good quality with 4-5 star reviews.

I've got to the point where I'm going back to only buying direct from amazon (if I can even still tell, it's not as easy as it used to be). Even sticking to "known" brands is difficult since brand licenses are often re-sold cheaply to different qualities of third party manufacturers in an era of globalization and cost-cutting driving down margins.

What can be a completely "buy it for life" quality item one year can in as short a time of 5 years have "sold out" their name and the products a shell of their former quality.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by cwilkes on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:12PM (#13039501)
I was just on Amazon and checked out the "fine art" section which had some interesting items. I selected "framed" and was surprised to see stuff in the $20 range. So I clicked on one and while it said "frame" in the title it didn't say it in the description. I suspect that it meant that it could be framed and that they aren't selling a frame with it.

I suppose that's an issue when you sell tens of thousands of art items and try to do categorize automatically. It just makes me trust them less.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by danudey on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:53PM (#13039750)
> Is the price double what it is from other retailers?

This is even worse in Canada. There appear to be tons of listings which consist solely of people finding things on Amazon.com that aren't on Amazon.ca and listing them for absurd prices. Example: a 4-pack of Kraft Dinner for $20 ($5/box), or a 12-pack for $48 ($4/box, a discount!).

Likewise, lots of people seem to take advantage of absurd shipping rates from American companies. I wanted to get my wife an iShower for her birthday, and while it was about a hundred bucks in the US (from them or Amazon.com), I was looking at $170+ Canadian from Amazon.ca (and this was when our currencies were almost at par). Tried to get it shipped from the US and the shipping was FedEx only, and it was something like $50-60 to get it shipped.

Now I order from Canadian retailers whenever I can, and I just get junk from Amazon when it's on sale.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ikeboy on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:17PM (#13038211)
> Is the price double what it is from other retailers?

How does physically going to Target help with this?

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by freehunter on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:37PM (#13038372)
Because Target's prices might not be 2x what other retailers are?

I tried to buy some dishwasher detergent on Amazon recently because my local store is almost always out of the brand I like. It was $16/12oz on Amazon, versus $3.99/12oz at my local store. I assume that's what he's talking about.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nommm-nommm on Friday November 25, 2016 @07:38PM (#13040991)
Amazon has done an amazing job of priming people to not comparison shop, just hit that buy button assuming that you're getting the best price. It's amazing.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by redler on Saturday November 26, 2016 @12:49PM (#13044903)
Good point. Turns out, the "prime" in "Amazon Prime" is a verb.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nommm-nommm on Saturday November 26, 2016 @03:22PM (#13045649)
It really works on a lot of people I know. Always buying tons and tons of stuff because "Prime." It's like "buy," "buy," "buy" all the time. I just find it amazingly fascinating.

Couple years ago. I was looking to buy a couple staples on Amazon once to spend enough for free shipping. I love Kraft Mac and cheese and it's a commodity item. Amazon was selling them for 3x the cost of the grocery store. Decided to check Walmart.com out of curiosity. They were normal grocery store price at Walmart.com, if you needed to order it online. I wonder if people actually think Kraft Mac and cheese actually costs that much.

I also noticed that the price of many toys skyrockets during December.

As an aside I've ordered Kraft Mac and cheese from jet.com at normal price since. Their prices and inventory change a lot though so you can't always get the same stuff and the same price.

http://www.npr.org/2015/06/04/412046900/retailer-arbitrage-h...

COHEN: So this is interesting. This is a Babies R Us 800 baby wipes.

GOLDSTEIN: The wipes are in one of those displays out in the middle of the aisle. They're selling for $16.99. As the father of two young kids, I feel like I have some insight here.

Baby stuff - I know how much baby stuff costs.

COHEN: OK. Is this a good price?

GOLDSTEIN: Not great. It's not great.

COHEN: Seventeen bucks for 800 wipes? It's a value box.

GOLDSTEIN: I mean, buy it if you want. I don't think there's a lot of margin in it for you.

COHEN: I think you're wrong.

GOLDSTEIN: Sam has brought along one of his employees, a guy named Jay Freiday, to help him with the shopping. Freiday pulls out his phone and looks up how much this $17 box of wipes is selling for on Amazon.

JAY FREIDAY: This is currently selling for $46.

GOLDSTEIN: Wait a minute. People are paying - what did you say?

FREIDAY: $46.

GOLDSTEIN: For 800 baby wipes?

FREIDAY: Yeah. It's a lot?

GOLDSTEIN: It's a lot.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Practicality on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:35PM (#13038346)
If it's the same price as Target, then you know it is double the price of other retailers. Simple really.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by sk5t on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:46PM (#13038459)
Hmm? AFAIK Target sets prices and shopper experience just a smidgen or two higher than Walmart. Although perhaps there may be some localized differences, I have never known it to be the Whole Foods of big-box general merchandise.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Practicality on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:01PM (#13038583)
Probably a local phenomena. I've done some comparison shopping in my town and the price of most identical items at the Target here is +50% over the Walmart. Not 100%, but plenty overpriced.

It's probably just because the locals don't want to be seen as "rednecks" for shopping at Walmart. (Of course there are plenty who don't mind, and I guess, better deal for them)

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by canes123456 on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:14PM (#13038722)
Do you see that regularly? At least online, I never see target more than 15% more than walmart and usually about the same.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Practicality on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:08PM (#13039466)
Yes. I keep thinking/hoping it's a temporary thing. Target is on my commute and Walmart is about 5 miles out of the way. I would much rather go to Target but I can't justify spending that much more to save the 15 minutes (unless I am buying only a few cheap things, in which case it's worth it).
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ikeboy on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:52PM (#13039742)
Order from walmart.com? Above $49 you get free shipping.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by nitelord on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:42PM (#13040742)
I notice my local Target regularly prices in-store items higher than their own online price, as much as 25% more. I've gotten them to price match without much hassle, but I'd rather shop at Walmart than have to deal with it.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Friday November 25, 2016 @07:17PM (#13040907)
That's one of the single best things about Wal-Mart, they don't f* around with prices, "Everyday low price" is both a motto and a method (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everyday_low_price), which also helps them keep their prices low, since they aren't engaging in all sorts of frictions in marking prices up and down, advertising sales, etc. etc. Probably also helps keep their logistics sane, they only have to deal with the normal ebbs and flows of demand, not artificial demand created by sales, or lack of demand created by people waiting for the next sale.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ikeboy on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:24PM (#13038278)
I've said this a few times here, but applying a simple filter of 98% feedback or so and at least 25 feedbacks will avoid 99% of the issues. You can also look at the expected shipping speed.

There are plenty of good, large sellers, and they didn't get that way by skimping on quality. You don't need to take a chance on smaller sellers if you don't want to.

(Also, many sellers use FBA which avoids most of the issues, the only concern there is really product quality, which again is something you don't need to worry too much about if it's an experienced seller. Commingling can cause problems, but it's very rare, if Amazon saw a significant number of problems from it they'd have stopped the program.)

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by yellow_postit on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:00PM (#13039041)
The seller followup emails are one of the more annoying day to day things I've noticed needing to deal with more with the shift to third party listings. I completely understand why they send them, because it is the best way to encourage reviews, but on a given eclectic order I may end up with 5 emails from different sellers.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by velodrome on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:57PM (#13039406)
This has always been their strategy. Do you know how hard it is to make any margin selling a TV or any electronics product? The sellers take most of the risk. Amazon collects their cut (which is substantial) without lifting a finger so to speak.

Personally, I avoid buying any electronics or valuables from Amazon due to counterfeit risk. They have the ability to curtail this activity but they choose not to. Also, the fake reviews damage the integrity of the marketplace. It really shows how much they care for their customers.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hackcasual on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:01PM (#13038067)
Finally cancelled my prime membership after 7 years. I just don't feel like Amazon is delivering the same level of service quality they used to
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by dawnerd on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:03PM (#13038086)
I've been on th fence on cancelling too. Only thing keeping me subscribed is prime now. I've found it immensely helpful and the restaurant delivery far better than the other delivery companies.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by 31reasons on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:04PM (#13038089)
So which better alternative did you move to?
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hackcasual on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:13PM (#13038179)
Trying not to buy as much. Shopping around before ordering. Waiting until I've got enough in my cart for free shipping.

I still use Amazon, I just don't pay them $99 a year for the privilege or treat them as the first store I go to

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ocdtrekkie on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:43PM (#13038927)
I've been doing this too, though if I'm going to buy a new video game, I sub Prime's monthly option for the month, because they give you $12 off the game, and the Prime is $11 for the month.

Note of warning: You'll discover a lot of random items are now "Prime exclusive" for no reason other than spite. No special discount, they just will refuse to sell you odd and end items unless you buy Prime.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by danudey on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:01PM (#13039796)
I wonder how many of those are such low-margin items that they effectively don't make a profit off them unless they restrict sales to people with prime (who are paying for the privilege)?
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by ocdtrekkie on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:22PM (#13039937)
It's so random it's hard to tell. Like random Blu-ray discs, regular household staples like diapers or shaver blade replacements, etc. And they'll come and go from the exclusive list every couple or weeks or so, it seems. There's a huge long-running thread on Amazon's forum about it.

What amazes me, is given Jeff Bezos' general attitude towards providing excellent customer service, is that Amazon has said nothing about this practice, and it's decidedly anti-consumer. If it was just a Prime discount or something, it wouldn't bother people nearly as much, but Amazon will outright refuse to sell without Prime for a lot of these items, unless it's also being sold by a third party seller you can buy from instead.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by gshakir on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:12PM (#13038166)
I recently bought Olive oil and a Nintendo wii game via Target with prices cheaper than Amazon. The web experience with Target has vastly improved. I am not sure what's Walmart experience is like.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:20PM (#13038233)
WalMart.com is very good. Same prices as in stores and for what I buy from it, staples so far, those have been quite a bit cheaper than Amazon/Amazon Pantry, reasonably quick free shipping for orders > $50 (several days but less than a week as I recall), double layer corrugated boxes (!), adequate packing in the two shipments I've received so far (albeit don't buy dry laundry detergent since they won't bag it and some will get on the surfaces of everything, although that's just annoying), and 3% off if you use one of their cards.

You'll pay local sales tax since they have stores everywhere. Wish I'd started using them when I recently bought a case of Sapporo Ichiban Miso Ramen, Amazon, which I think had a slightly lower price, was out, so I went with a 3rd party which a high rating, which had the brilliant idea of unpacking the case and stuffing it into a Medium size Priority Mail box, which can comfortably only hold half as many. As long as none of the soup base packets were punctured by this stunt I'll come out OK, but....

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by jamiesonbecker on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:49PM (#13038478)
Wal-mart pickup for groceries is amazing, too. You don't even have to get out of the car, and everything is cold and fresh (they have separate fridges/freezers for pickup orders).

... of course, you still have to carry the stuff in and find space in the fridge yourself ...

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:21PM (#13038776)
Oh, wow, I didn't realize that about that service.

Recent Real Life developments have resulted in logistics limiting me to cold stuff I can put in an insulated backpack with a ice pack, but, yeah, I could use this to get cold and frozen stuff without much hassle. Thanks!

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by vonmoltke on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:33PM (#13040697)
In my one (and only) experience with Amazon Pantry I ordered several boxes of Near East couscous and several boxes of Bounce dryer sheets (amongst other things). They packed them in the same giant box. I had to throw out all the couscous because it tasted like dryer sheets.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hga on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:51PM (#13040789)
Yeah, well, perfume is utterly evil, says this life long sufferer of allergies. So that powdered detergent, it was in theory perfume free. But not entirely, Procter & Gamble i.e. Tide and it now seems Sun Products Corporation i.e. All don't bother to clean their machinery between running off lots of normal and "free" of evil stuff, one reason I gave up Tide and switched to All, but fortunately the All is not too bad, at least as of yet.

Also had to give up on Vanicream soap when I assume the company they contract with to make their stuff massively dosed two quite separated in time batches with perfume. Which also taught me to try 1 of every new batch of stuff I buy (I tend to buy stuff like that in April and October when the weather is mild, and increase my inventory to ~12 months so I have plenty of time to find a new brand or solution if the old one goes bad or is discontinued).

Hay, save the nose of the allergy sufferers in your life, get the perfume free stuff by default! At least if it doesn't cost any more to speak of....

And, yeah, I gather the whole shtick of Amazon Pantry is that you buy enough stuff to fill up one big box, no doubt by weight as well as size, which I assume they've worked out deals to ship cheaply. Haven't tried it yet since I've found WalMart.com to be so much cheaper, while there's some Pantry exclusive items, or, say, they're available in quantity 1 that way, I just haven't been able to come close to filling up a box. WalMart doesn't care, except in giving you a strong incentive to buy at least $50.01 of stuff at a time, which isn't hard.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by sean_patel on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:08PM (#13039463)
> Trying not to buy as much.

This. Amazon makes it very easy with it's "frictionless" 1-click buying functionality to buy loads of crap that you don't really need. I make it very hard on myself, and put barriers to buying. Sometimes I will add something to the cart (since they force you to do it to show price for some items) and then let it sit there for days. Many times, I've come back and wondered why I even added something to the cart in the 1st place.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by hackcasual on Friday November 25, 2016 @04:24PM (#13039953)
Yeah. Without a doubt I've saved money on shipping with prime, but I've also bought so much shit I don't need.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by JustSomeNobody on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:18PM (#13038221)
Why do you think they did? Maybe they just do without. That's a perfectly valid option. If you don't think you're getting value for your money at Amazon, don't spend it there. This is no way implies there's something better. It's just smart money handling.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by UnoriginalGuy on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:21PM (#13038242)
Target.com has been pretty solid for me (Red Card required).
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by gshakir on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:25PM (#13038284)
Totally agree on Red card which gives you 5% discount and donates to your kid's school.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by mrfusion on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:35PM (#13038352)
I'm curious why they want to turn into eBay basically. Is there profit in that?
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by colechristensen on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:43PM (#13038420)
They really want to turn into a logistics company.

Amazon packs, warehouses, and delivers your package acting as payment manager, and customer service while hosting your IT infrastructure.

They want to sell pickaxes and do laundry for gold miners.

The part where Amazon isn't packing and shipping your product is a weak link – killing fake reviews helps this though.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by Practicality on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:39PM (#13038386)
For what it's worth eBay does turn a profit most years: http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ebay/financials
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by cookiecaper on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:07PM (#13038646)
There's a lot more profit in being a platform than a retailer. Amazon is letting other parties use their platform to do the high-capital, low-margin, race-to-the-bottom retail side and taking a massive chunk out of each sale. This is much more lucrative than sourcing, building, buying, and storing items directly.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by awqrre on Friday November 25, 2016 @09:21PM (#13041341)
I don't know if it is new but lately I have seen more brand-new-sellers advertising low priced products on Amazon that never ship... You don't usually need to do anything to get a refund, but it wastes people's time and is especially bad if you miss out on a good deal on black Friday because of it...
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by strathmeyer on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:42PM (#13039685)
Conterfeit products? There are brand owners who will have any resellers of their products removed. They threaten to shut down my store. Meanwhile it's easy to find a counterfeit iPod. Nobody seems to care.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by CamperBob2 on Friday November 25, 2016 @03:24PM (#13039559)
+1. It's almost as if we're going to need "buyer's agents" before too long, the way Amazon is going. Independent curators for hire who can wade through all the crap listings for us.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by izacus on Saturday November 26, 2016 @04:02AM (#13042633)
Yes, this! Also (being from the smaller EU country), half of those listings on amazon.de now greet me with "This doesn't ship to your country.".

Of course, no filters to what does ship to me. One year ago that somehow wasn't even an issue. It seems that Amazon is turning into same crappy service as Ebay :(

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by jknoepfler on Friday November 25, 2016 @02:01PM (#13039042)
You should provide numbers, not anecdotes. As the number of third party vendors grows, the long tail of bad vendors will fill itself out. That is not evidence that the mean/median experience has gotten worse.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by intrasight on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:32AM (#13037829)
As long as I can filter those out, I am good.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by patall on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:06PM (#13038116)
But you can only do that when you have time. I was recently investigating a product with very good reviews. They looked quite good. Then I noticed that most of them used very broken german which, when you compared them showed a pattern and looking into the users showed clearly that they were faked. But I can not trust that they are always that easy to spot, so the only possibility for me to check remains to check several low star reviews and look whether they complain about valid problems or just nonsense. The problem I see is that those fake stories are getting better and at some point will be indistiguishable from real reviews. And you will certainly not notice it when you are just quick checking several products or sellers in 30 seconds each.
Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by srathi on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:15PM (#13041688)
I recommend checking the review analysis on [1] before making a purchase on Amazon.

[1] www.fakespot.com

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by tyingq on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:03PM (#13038087)
How are you doing that? There are some things you can filter on, like brand, that come close, but not specifically "no third parties".

Edit: Answered my own question. You can find a place to restrict seller to "amazon.com". It's not 100% useful for all searches though, as you filter out sellers like "Apple", or "Bose". Would be nice if you could filter seller down to "Manufacturer or Amazon.com" in some easy way.

Re:Amazon makes good on its promise to delete “incentivized”... by rhizome on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:09PM (#13038669)
TweetDeck for Amazon: I See A Great Need.