News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by Willingham on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:25AM (#50392641)
The rollout is so confusing. Going straight to the Gemini app and asking when I can use this model gets me vague and contradicting answers. Ultimately it sounds like the Vids rollout will take 1-3 days, and you can go to vids.new on desktop to see if you’ve won the lottery and have it available now, apparently on any free Google account. Business accounts can use it too. Meanwhile the Gemini app is getting it on paid plans, but with different video length limits and no clear rollout timeline. If you pay for the API, it’s available now apparently.

Why is this so difficult to figure out?

Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by jcelerier on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:33AM (#50392748)
I opened ai studio and i see it popping up, on a normal account: https://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_chat?model=gemini-om...
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by WarmWash on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:33AM (#50392756)
https://flow.google.com/ is where most people would use the model. You get credits with your monthly sub that you can spend on flow.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by CharlieDigital on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:03AM (#50393186)
Never even heard of this until today.

I think they are doing a terrible job with their product packaging. Like others, I also gave up with Google models long ago due to difficulty in accessing and low limits.

My gut is that this is reflective of their fragmented internal product organization around AI.

Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by WarmWash on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:11AM (#50393282)
Google has been like this forever.

Excellent engineering and awful product.

Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by pjmlp on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:51AM (#50393884)
It has been a while, but I used to read AOSP source code quite regularly, and always wondered where do all those engineers that pass the famous Google interviews land, because they certainly weren't writing the Java and C++ code in Android, given how it looked like, or the whole mess with NDK headers, and other stuff in the tooling.

Ah, and the Eclipse/Android Studio stable releases, that usually have bugs as if they were still preview, release candidate ones.

Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by CharlieDigital on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:54AM (#50393934)
What's clear to me: leetcode and quality code are not the same skillset.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by tomrod on Friday November 06, 2026 @11:10AM (#50394222)
It's okay to say that Google's engineering is also poor. If they had good engineering, they'd study their users and lead to product improvements. It's really not either/or.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by iAMkenough on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:38AM (#50393662)
Uhg that’s my issue. I keep getting it mixed up with https://wave.google.com/
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by JacobAsmuth on Friday November 06, 2026 @02:08PM (#50396873)
I have an Ultra sub and only see Veo and Omni 1.1 models.
Re:Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash by jjulius on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:31AM (#50393564)
>Going straight to the Gemini app and asking when I can use this model gets me vague and contradicting answers.

In other words, business as usual.