News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

jjulius

Re:Anthropic's growth just flattened (really) on Monday November 02, 2026 @06:50PM (#50345963)
This is conflating the benefits found within those areas with the ability of AI to actually deliver those things effectively across every single profession. Improving something by 2% vs. revolutionizing an entire industry are wholly different propositions. Maslow's hammer would like a word.
Re:Anthropic's growth just flattened (really) on Monday November 02, 2026 @06:43PM (#50345852)
Right, this is what astonishes me about the constant rhetoric/hyperbole about how this is going to impact "all the jobs" and make everyone wildly more productive than ever before. It's a fabulous tool in a limited number of areas, and is handy here and there. But just because it's a fabulous tool for the coding that is so prevalent among HN users does not mean that it's a fabulous tool for everything.

A hammer is fantastic for driving nails, but it's not really all that good at washing a dog.

It doesn't remove our ideological differences, no. Nor should it. What it does is make us more likely to understand and communicate better with one another. That's the first step towards getting along and finding a path forward together in spite of our differences.

Differences of opinion are okay, but it's harder to get along when our lives are lived in spaces that silo us off and encourage distrust and anger. Screens do that to us, meatspace doesn't.

Media illiteracy coupled with the sweet, sweet comfort of a screen. People love screens. Just look at how much awe young children (I say this as a parent of two littles) have when they first see a TV. Now look at how much we all love to look at screens of any kind.

We're absolutely fascinated by them. Gobsmacked.

And many people blindly believe what they see on their screens because they don't know any better. They trust the article they read without thinking too deeply about it or looking for alternative perspectives. They gobble up the reel they just watched and are irate about whatever it told them to be irate about. But this isn't anything new, just look at how easily grandma and grandpa gobbled up whatever Fox News fed them in 1998, or what heavily edited images designed to manipulate their thoughts and opinions they were exposed to in the 70s, the 80s when they turned the television on.

Screens have always, and will always, be used to manipulate people, and that's been incredibly amplified over the past 15-20 years.

Yet if you take the screen away and spend time connecting with people on a deeper level, really spend time getting to know them, life feels a hell of a lot different than what the screens show you. Understanding one another is a hell of a lot easier. Everyone can see exactly the same thing as the other person - the analog, meatspace world around them that isn't being manipulated and twisted in an effort to get them to think a certain way.

It's the screens.

We do most of our communicating via phones on platforms that encourage flip, nuance-free takes, are hotbeds of disinformation, and so on. Nothing about the environments we exist in foster positive, meaningful communication that collectively benefits us. Everything we used is designed to divide.

Our inability to collectively get along ramped up exponentially as smartphones took off. Phones, and the platforms within that people have become dependent upon, are the root.

Edit: Instead of getting to know people at a deep level, understanding what shapes their core views and how they view the world, and constructively communicating with them to shape their worldview over time for the better, we prefer to yell and scream at each other in 140 characters for the sake of upvotes.

Real change and progress takes time and effort, but for some reason we're collectively deluded into thinking that it'll happen via upvotes in 45 seconds and without ever having looked one another in the eye.

Assuming that's true, why are they more unhappy without them? Sounds akin to dependency/withdrawals at that point.
Re:Amazon's "Digital Pacifier" for Toddlers on Monday October 26, 2026 @07:03PM (#50252407)
I very much am, feel free to engage! :) I was genuinely interested in how you made that leap, or we could talk about how parents navigate the logistics of balancing an emphasis on books vs. exposing them to challenging scenarios, or whathaveyou. Had you maybe discussed how you made that leap when I asked, perhaps we'd be having that conversation right now. ;)
Re:Amazon's "Digital Pacifier" for Toddlers on Monday October 26, 2026 @08:30AM (#50242528)
You seem to prefer flip "Ooh, gotcha!" responses as opposed to having an actual conversation.
Re:Amazon's "Digital Pacifier" for Toddlers on Monday October 26, 2026 @12:11AM (#50239021)
So, they screamed for 30 minutes. They're kids. I'm not gonna give my 4 or 6 year-old something that's gonna take a hatchet to their attention span just because they're doing a thing that's completely normal for that age.

That drive fucking sucks ass, don't get me wrong, but oh well, that's part of life - the kid has to learn that sometimes shit's not gonna go their way and they have to figure out how to get over it. I'll be damned if I'm gonna teach them that the way they can calm themselves down and regulate their emotions is by the sweet, sweet blue hue of a tablet.

We're a two working parent household and we keep screen time limited to a short amount of TV time. We'll expose them to screens more and more so that we can properly educate them over time, sure. But man, I don't get the whole, "even a two working parent household barely has time for anything and is stressful," bit because - yeah, that's exactly what parenting is.

Parenting is hard. It's exhausting. If you don't have a village, the onus is on you to do it right. That's what we've signed up for, is giving our all to our kids until they're out on their own. That's what we're supposed to do. It's not supposed to be easy. But we're here, so let's do the hard work and do it right. We owe it to them.

Re:Amazon's "Digital Pacifier" for Toddlers on Monday October 26, 2026 @12:06AM (#50238985)
"My kids still like books" = "I'm not teaching them how to control themselves in front of addictive software"?
Re:Amazon's "Digital Pacifier" for Toddlers on Monday October 26, 2026 @12:03AM (#50238974)
>The reality is that majority of kids have always been allowed some form of screen time and todays screentime is going to at least be more interactive than yesterdays screentime.

I say this as a parent - hogwash. Fred Rogers looked into children's souls and spoke to them deeply at a nice comfortable pace and kids felt that, whereas today's modern screens utterly eviscerate their attention spans.

Re:Eunice is almost here (William Gibson, Agency) on Sunday October 25, 2026 @07:40PM (#50237168)
>One does not need to be a part of the enshitiffication of the internet.

Likewise, what with your shot-from-the-hip response that lambastes OP in a non-constructive way, the very kind of unhelpful "dialogue" that is all too common on the Internet these days.

Perhaps someone is genuinely ignorant and it could've behooved you to have kindly offered suggestions as to which of the "thousands decent science fiction and literature sites out there" your strongly opinionated, holier than thou self finds most valuable? Seems like a better place to start than whatever... this is.

Re:Eunice is almost here (William Gibson, Agency) on Sunday October 25, 2026 @07:37PM (#50237142)
Wow.
Giving up on Google and moving away from them is the way.
Re:How is music possible on Friday October 23, 2026 @03:18PM (#50214014)
I don't know that it risks killing it, but I generally agree with your sentiment. Why can't we just be satisfied with the fact that we enjoy it? Why do we need an explanation for everything? We've removed so much mystery and awe from the every day already...
>This is pedantic. Disney is clarifying that live content will have ads.

This is pedantic. If folk can't see that this is a slow roll towards rolling out the same thing in the US eventually, I've got a bridge to sell you.

Re:Shitter – A Nitter Fork on Friday October 23, 2026 @11:11AM (#50210408)
>I generally agree but I'm still frequently linked to X...

... so? Being linked to it is not an obligation to bother with it, neither is FOMO.

Re:What Is Gridifcation on Thursday October 22, 2026 @02:08PM (#50198985)
There are multiple comments in here about contemporary jazz musicians, so I'm gonna pick this one to piggyback on and recommend some more for those who might also be interested. OP says they're into sax and guitar, I've got a general penchant for anyone who messes with "time", so swung/off-kilter rhythms (what's up, J Dilla), syncopation, odd time signatures and so on, but I'll also keep it fairly "normal" in that area for a lot of these...

Chris Dave, Marcus King and Cory Henry @ the Blue Note, an absolutely stellar performance from start to finish https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woiMRaeimqQ

Pino Palladino, Blake Mills & Same Gendel - Just Wrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im-Avcv7deE

Pino Palladino, Blake Mills & Chris Dave - Taka https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6s5JavYgE0

Snarky Puppy - Lingus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_XJ_s5IsQc

Robert Glasper, Chris Dave, Derek Hodge & Yasiin Bey, Live @ North Sea Jazz Festival 2019, a really dope combination of contemporary and classic Jazz alongside Hip Hop (Glasper riffing on some Thelonious Monk while trading phrases with Chris Dave as Bey drops some unreleased Black Star is so damn fun) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5QVcYeT74I

R+R=NOW performing Resting Warrior live, time signature is 15/8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmrYWVos0Cs

Nate Smith Live @ Paradiso https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pVRd_hproY

Nubya Garcia @ KEXP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7d9T71UWXE

Yussef Dayes - Black Classical Music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPXamHHDfNI

Re:Railway Security Disclosure on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @10:36PM (#50190490)
>We are going back to static htmls for public pages...

God yes, please. I backpack and mountaineer in the PNW and have been trying to research trip ideas up in British Columbia, and as a result I discovered https://bivouac.com.

Here's a website that's still frequently used by a large number of people as a valuable resource, is regularly updated and maintained, and yet looks like it's straight out of 1995.

Every pages loads instantaneously, everything is simple yet packed with detail, and it's such a basic, straightforward, delightfully pleasant experience to just browse through the site. I was so thrilled after just 5 minutes on the site that I threw them $25 for a year's full access.

Sorry for the tangent, but oh man, it's such a refreshingly stark contrast to the rest of the bullshit that fills the web these days.

Re:Railway Security Disclosure on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @10:27PM (#50190432)
I didn't read it as that, more as, "You might hear about other similar work-related bullshit here while you're trying to chill and not think about it".
Re:Railway Security Disclosure on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @10:26PM (#50190426)
Whoo hoo, enjoy! :D
Re:Railway Security Disclosure on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @07:05PM (#50188897)
Prioritize your mental health, go enjoy your vacation.
Yep, there's a ton of it to be found especially in the Columbia River Gorge. For anyone not hip to Nick Zentner, allow me to introduce you to this national treasure...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQhjkemEyUo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSi17xJB1Sg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IjLO9ABKYU

... how is a comment observing the really cool basalt rock formations in the photo being downvoted? Most HN readers are (I'd assume) nerds, are we not allowed to nerd out about geography?
I'd wager there was hardly an engineer in the loop at all. Dollars to donuts this was vibe-coded.
Re:Publish fake stats, get cited in LLMs on Tuesday October 20, 2026 @10:55AM (#50167381)
>1. This is a 2022 era picture that LLMs just suck up what's on the Internet and regurgitate it. It hasn't been true for a long time.

When I ask ChatGPT certain questions, it very clearly shows me the sources it's searching through in the form of favicons, and they're always the favicons of sites that are in the first 5-10 results for a Google search query that would fit what I've asked the LLM. It will then cite those websites as it's source, with a direct link to the page that also shows up in an equivalent Google search. It does that daily.

Re:It's still OK to enjoy programming on Monday October 19, 2026 @02:44PM (#50156248)
>People are complaining that they don't get to enjoy what they do for work any more.

And that's OK.

>AI has destroyed a major source of "life's meaning"...

Ah, but that's precisely the beauty of life, that there is no meaning. Life just "is".

Re:William Gibson and the Trademarking of Cyberspace on Sunday October 18, 2026 @11:07PM (#50147915)
> ... if you don't know, don't know...

See, this made me know. I'm gonna go shower. :(

> ... and calling someone else a liar (without actually doing it, naturally).

I mean, when someone blanket generalizes and casts a very wide net, saying that it happens "all the time", and someone with 40 years of theater-going experience in those locales has not seen it happen once, then yeah, they're gonna point out that you're, at the very least, hyperbolically stretching the truth.

Please spare me the high and mightiness about any passive aggressiveness in my post, I just responded in kind to your own passive dig at those locales. If you're going to make tall claims like you did, don't be surprised when people push back.

Older »