News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by bombcar on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @05:49AM (#50178192)
Of COURSE it's easy to crack, 4 isn't even prime!
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by DavidSJ on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @06:12AM (#50178440)
In their defense, they were probably targeting the Mersenne prime 2^2 - 1 and just made a typo.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by throw0101a on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @06:41AM (#50178709)
> In their defense, they were probably targeting the Mersenne prime 2^2 - 1 and just made a typo.

There are two hard problems in computer science: naming things, cache invalidation, and off-by-one errors.

Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by zapkyeskrill on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @08:10AM (#50179564)
Two, and only two?
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by amoss on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @08:41AM (#50179923)
You have almost understood the joke.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by floydnoel on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @02:21PM (#50185317)
two is off-by-one from three btw
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by arzmir on Thursday October 22, 2026 @12:06PM (#50197292)
But the cache invalidation failed
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by throw0101a on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @05:16PM (#50187747)
Well:

    There are actually only two hard problems in computer science:
        0) Cache invalidation
        1) Naming things
        4) Asynchronous callbacks
        2) Off-by-one errors
        3) Scope creep
        6) Bounds checking
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38806257

Also: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/TwoHardThings.html

Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by wolfi1 on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @07:06AM (#50178904)
ok, it's joke. but for those who don't get it: elliptic curves don't need primes
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by joshuat on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @05:53AM (#50178241)
It’s really impressive no one caught their three previous private key values
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by bcvvvy on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @06:00AM (#50178327)
I suspect they did but it wasn't publicised.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by chompychop on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @07:23AM (#50179061)
They should have gone with 57. Everyone knows it's prime.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by kachnuv_ocasek on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @07:35AM (#50179184)
Alex? You're alive after all?
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by bee_rider on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @10:21AM (#50181506)
I wonder if anyone wants to over-analyze this joke to come up with the best candidates for the number? 57 falls too easily to the quick divisibility by 3 trick, IMO. (I realize over-analyzing jokes always makes them unfunny but we can pick the best number here and nobody has to know).
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by samatman on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @12:05PM (#50183286)
Me! I'm in!

Most-nearly-prime number under 100 is.... 91.

13 x 7. You've either memorized that or you're going to have fun deciding it's not prime. And if you did times tables up to 13, congratulations, you're special.

Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by sejje on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @03:38PM (#50186424)
7 is an easy check, not because i did them up to 13.

because 10x7 = 70, i'm left with 21. everyone knows 21 is divisible by 7.

Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by bee_rider on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @04:20PM (#50187057)
I think 91 is a strong contender. Sejje has a way of working it out, but of course any small non-prime will have some trick to it.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by delibes on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @06:32AM (#50178619)
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by lta on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @07:41AM (#50179251)
It's been a while since this one popped up. It's surprising how many of those doodles are surviving the test if times, in the midst unexpected ways
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by walrus01 on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @06:39AM (#50178693)
Hey, that's the same combination I have on my luggage!
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by wowczarek on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @08:06AM (#50179518)
Good job the Earth doesn't have an air shield protected by this byte or we'd be Skroob'd.
Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by Zeetah on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @09:42AM (#50180822)
The number 4 is very famous.

https://xkcd.com/221/

Re:Eight Bits of Trust; eMudhra's CA keys cracked in millise... by ohuf on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @10:08AM (#50181272)
it doesn't have to be and it actually never is: this isn't RSA, it's an elliptic curve algorithm. if you'd have read the article, you'd have understood this