Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by naagi on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:23PM
(#49970157)
shortsighted and a bit late anyway
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by robotpepi on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:20PM
(#49970122)
what?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by lencastre on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:21PM
(#49970135)
is your favourite colour?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by Johnyjohnson123 on Monday October 05, 2026 @05:52PM
(#49971373)
Yellow, yours ?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by blobcode on Monday October 05, 2026 @06:42PM
(#49971815)
Wrong!
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by AspireOne on Monday October 05, 2026 @08:53PM
(#49972814)
Is not a color.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by a_e_k on Monday October 05, 2026 @11:15PM
(#49973731)
Blue. No, yel--
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by bitwize on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:26PM
(#49970200)
Closed source will do squat unless you protect your binaries with some sort of secure enclave encryption scheme. AI can reverse engineer your binaries and deliver a copyright-laundered version in hours or days.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by randomNumber7 on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @02:15PM
(#49982059)
You give the user access to the software over a web interface. He has never access to the binaries because they are on your servers.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by simianwords on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:32PM
(#49970274)
is this an excellent LARP bait or someone with these sincere views?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by pbkompasz on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:44PM
(#49970428)
Why not both?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by mellosouls on Monday October 05, 2026 @05:01PM
(#49970674)
We can call it Coding Canutism.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by moronicles on Monday October 05, 2026 @05:22PM
(#49970978)
Who exactly is it that will be doing the gatekeeping? I have a hard time imagining companies caring much about competitive coding scores, and I’ve certainly never heard of layoffs being decided based on LeetCode performance.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by dominotw on Monday October 05, 2026 @07:04PM
(#49971995)
> layoffs being decided based on LeetCode performance.
thats not what gatekeeping is
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by jbs789 on Monday October 05, 2026 @06:11PM
(#49971586)
Two decades learning from others, then close the gate. Can’t ding you for inconsistency though. Your contribution to this discussion is consistent with your new ethos. Good luck with your new approach to the world.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by JSR_FDED on Monday October 05, 2026 @10:32PM
(#49973478)
I took his comment to mean that programming jobs should be kept for people who genuinely care about developing a deep understanding and a willingness to learn, instead of those just typing prompts and not really caring beyond that.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by hex4def6 on Monday October 05, 2026 @11:51PM
(#49973942)
That's the charitable way of interpreting it. The less charitable way is that they're bitter that open-source has basically been used to train their replacement, and that they want to turn programming into effectively a guild-based profession to protect the jobs of those presently in the industry. Similar to the button-making guilds of the past, for instance.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by dominotw on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @09:43AM
(#49978381)
Well there is something between 'button making guilds' and 'go to bootcamp for 2 months to be a software engineer'
Every other profession does gatekeeping. Yet we dont see any animosity towards them for doing so. Infact we condone it.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by kbelder on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @04:37PM
(#49983747)
I have animosity for most of them!
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by dominotw on Wednesday October 07, 2026 @09:52AM
(#49992923)
can you share specifically what animosity you have towards doctors?
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by bluefirebrand on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @04:23PM
(#49983566)
> That's the charitable way of interpreting it
It's a good thing that "interpret people's comments charitably" is one of the top guidelines on this forum then
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by buriram on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @02:07AM
(#49974815)
Pulling up the ladder is very common among any kind of society, profession and immigration policies. And people advocate for it all the time.
Re:Competitive Programmer's Handbook (2018) [pdf]
by shahbaby on Monday October 05, 2026 @07:51PM
(#49972349)
I'm not sure if I agree with this but I find the downvotes at even the suggestion of some mechanisim to protect employment sad.
No other profession is as eager to make themselves obsolete as those who build software.
Maybe they think the world runs on meritocracy. Anyway looks like now they are seeing what happens when there are no gates at all and anyone can do what you do.
Closedsource, credentialism and gatekeeping is my new stance.