mellosouls

I'm using it exactly the way it was designed to be used; that's why they allowed access via Chat. They've just decided merging is more economical.

The models may switch occasionally in terms of who the class leader is in certain disciplines, but at the top level either provider is enough for professional coders.

Saying that either is only suitable for non-coders sounds gatekeepery and very out of touch.

We use Chat precisely because of that!

It's not unreasonable for them to switch but you really should not be so dismissive, this will likely have a massive effect on many.

I've been using Chat for all my Codex/Work tasks precisely because of the fact it didn't affect usage. Slightly less convenient and smooth but still directly against GitHub repos and other connectors so fantastic value in my Plus plan.

Another reason after the recent Pro 200/500 shenanigans to reevaluate my sub.

All good things and token-burning workarounds come to an end...

Some of us have been thinking deeply about this subject for many years.

Long before the LLM era I (and I'm sure many others) considered AI a misnomer in the context of human-level intelligence, tho I did (apparently wrongly) consider sentience a prerequisite.

Trump may be coming at this from different motivations, but it's entirely consistent.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50268868

ofc his corollary points about implications for American power are debatable; but we are now living for the first time in our history with an alien intelligence that in some cases exceeds our own, and its reasonable to consider how we deal with that on a cultural and political level.

You clearly aren't that person.

Regarding your perceived mistake, we all make them.

Please forgive yourself and understand that the negative feelings and thoughts you are having are a mark of decency but do not represent reality, and if they persist please seek help to get you back on track.

As an aside, to you and those like you who take on the task of fighting and protecting against these attacks with often nothing to gain except hurt like this:

Thank you for your service.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

Of course ofcom knows its power is limited, that shouldn't stop it attempting to do it's job, however much that job might irk foreign operators publishing to ofcoms jurisdiction.

The fact is the US has different standards to the UK. It doesn't mean one is right and one is wrong but it does mean that those differences will cause cultural and legal friction that responsible operators will attempt to diminish within reason, while others will attempt to capitalize for publicity.

Perhaps it reflects the amount of work and thought that has gone into it, but I really think the optics are better if the selling points are immediately obvious to the user.

Hopefully some light will be shed in further blogs.

Sometimes these "open source" services are a bit misleading as there is a coupling to the org providing them; I think the OP here just means there's nothing extra needed beyond whatever cloudflare commitment you already have.

You don't even need to click on the link to predict the Canute-style tone.

The emotional reaction is understandable, but should not guide the rational response.