News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:23PM (#46532031)
What lunacy?
Re:Eat Real Food by jmuguy on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:57PM (#46532612)
Listening to him talk about the Spanish Flu, and clearly not understand why secondary bacterial infections killed more people than the flu itself, was my personal point of "wow, this guy is an idiot".
Re:Eat Real Food by burkaman on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:09PM (#46532839)
In his book "The Real Anthony Fauci" he spends a whole chapter claiming that HIV does not cause AIDS and it was actually caused by recreational drug use.
Re:Eat Real Food by deepsquirrelnet on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:38PM (#46532298)
AI generated health report citing hallucinated research and incorrectly representing real research.
Re:Eat Real Food by notaustinpowers on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:11PM (#46532882)
He believes germ theory is a creation of Big Pharma to push "patented pills, powders, pricks, potions, and poisons and the powerful professions of virology and vaccinology"

He believes in the miasma theory and just maintaining a healthy immune is enough to keep you from getting sick.

Just read his book, "The Real Anthony Fauci" and you'll realize that this man shouldn't be trusted to run a kindergarten nurses office.

Re:Eat Real Food by cr125rider on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:24PM (#46532054)
We don’t need good vaccines anymore even though infectious diseases are on the rise. Other global medical experts seem to be going against many of his plans.
Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:39PM (#46534189)
Kennedy has never said anything like that
Re:Eat Real Food by wsatb on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @08:28PM (#46535885)
"There’s no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective."

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/11/scicheck-rfk-jr-incorrectl...

Re:Eat Real Food by burkaman on Thursday January 08, 2026 @09:42AM (#46541557)
Some direct, in-context quotes:

> There’s no vaccine that is safe and effective. [interviewer pushes back, brings up polio vaccine] So if you say to me, “The polio vaccine, was it effective against polio?” I’m going to say, “Yes.” And if say to me, “Did it cause more death than avert?” I would say, “I don’t know, because we don’t have the data on that.”

> The most popular vaccine in the world is the DTP vaccine. [...] That vaccine caused so many injuries that Wyeth, which was the manufacturer, said to the Reagan administration, “We are now paying $20 in downstream liabilities for every dollar that we’re making in profits, and we are getting out of the business unless you give us permanent immunity from liability.” And by the way, Reagan said at that time, “Why don’t you just make the vaccine safe?” And why is that? Because vaccines are inherently unsafe. They said, “Unavoidably unsafe, you cannot make them safe.”

Not going quote the whole thing because it's long, but he repeatedly drives home his point that all vaccines are inherently unsafe, and the injuries and deaths they cause always outweigh their effectiveness against disease.

- https://lexfridman.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr-transcript/

> I see somebody on a hiking trail carrying a little baby and I say to him, ‘Better not get him vaccinated.’ And he heard that from me. If he hears it from 10 other people, maybe he won’t do it, you know, maybe he will save that child.

> If you’re one of 10 people that goes up to a guy, a man or a woman, who’s carrying a baby, and says, ‘Don’t vaccinate that baby,’ when they hear that from 10 people, it’ll make an impression on ‘em, you know. And we all kept our mouth shut. Don’t keep your mouth shut anymore. Confront everybody on it.

- https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/the-way-forward/hffh-th... timestamp 11:54, 13:30

This one is interesting because the interviewer prompts him with something like "we aren't anti-vaccine, we just want to make sure they're safe" and he does not agree, he repeatedly says, with no qualification, "tell everyone not to vaccinate their children".

I don't believe he has ever voluntarily made a positive public comment about any vaccine. He did during his confirmation hearing, but he was obviously heavily incentivized to do so. During that hearing he did not say his opinion had changed, he simply lied about all past comments and claimed they never happened.

Re:Eat Real Food by vscode-rest on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:41PM (#46532357)
The end result of his vax push has been to reduce the set of government required vaccines down to the same set used by Europe already. Additional vaccination is still available should an individual elect.

Are you of the opinion that the European recommendation is insufficient? Would you petition European healthcare industry that they are requiring too few vaccines? If so, I would expect Europeans to be chronically far more diseased than Americans, do we see that in the data?

Re:Eat Real Food by amanaplanacanal on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:12PM (#46532889)
The argument I've seen is that because the US has worse medical care in general, it makes sense to get more vaccinations.
Re:Eat Real Food by j0057 on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:19PM (#46533005)
I haven't particularly kept up with RFKs brand of MAGA craziness, but all European countries have different childhood vaccination schedules, with some overlap, see here: https://vaccination-info.europa.eu/en/about-vaccines/when-va...
Re:Eat Real Food by vscode-rest on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @10:19PM (#46536775)
The superset of all Euro vaccines is still much smaller than what the US had. Are we that much healthier?
Re:Eat Real Food by davorak on Thursday January 08, 2026 @03:06AM (#46538549)
What is on the US schedule that is not on Euro schedule?
Re:Eat Real Food by burkaman on Thursday January 08, 2026 @10:02AM (#46541841)
Here's the US vaccine schedule pre-RFK: https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?q=schedule&start=0&rows=10...

Here's a site where you can view vaccine schedules across Europe: https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu/

The only outlier is Hepatitis A, which is still recommended in some European countries. On the reverse side, the meningococcal vaccine is commonly scheduled in Europe but not in the US.

Re:Eat Real Food by Izikiel43 on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:22PM (#46533051)
They are based on denmark's guidelines, which as you know is a very cold country.

One of the vaccines made strictly optional was for dengue, which is not really a thing in denmark since I think they don't have that many mosquitos due to weather.

However, in the US, mosquitos and tropical weather are common for a large part of the population.

Point being, a huge country with a huge variety of climates and diseases shouldn't follow the lead of a small country with a fairly homogenous weather and disease pattern.

Re:Eat Real Food by vscode-rest on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @10:16PM (#46536760)
Are you familiar with any European country that does schedule a dengue vaccine? It is not listed here: https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu/
Re:Eat Real Food by Izikiel43 on Wednesday January 14, 2026 @04:29PM (#46623809)
Maybe because dengue is not endemic in Europe? And it is in the Americas?
Re:Eat Real Food by hn_acc1 on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:28PM (#46533158)
Once those additional vaccines are off the "routine" schedule, they'll be pulled by the suppliers, because it eliminates exemption from lawsuits. If you "choose" a non-routine vaccination, people can then sue pharma for ANY harm, and you can be sure there'll be a bunch of crackpot right-wingers trying to prove each one is "bad" and they'll disappear sooner or later. RFK's fans (Del Bigtree) have admitted that this is their plan. And if they're NOT routine, they'll probably not be covered by insurance, so you'll have to pay hundreds or thousands to get one. I would still do that, but not many others will.

Electing to get all ZERO optional vaccines actually available to you because of "reasons" isn't much of a choice.

Re:Eat Real Food by jimbobimbo on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:05PM (#46533746)
"Once those additional vaccines are off the "routine" schedule, they'll be pulled by the suppliers, because it eliminates exemption from lawsuits"

Why is this bad? From one of the threads - "There IS scrutiny on vaccines, by the scientific and medical community - your "scrutiny" (as presumably neither a PhD in a relevant field or MD) is not valuable or relevant. There is decades of research that says that currently recommended vaccines are safe and effective."

OK, then there won't be grounds for lawsuits or lawsuits will be easily dismissed.

"you can be sure there'll be a bunch of crackpot right-wingers trying to prove each one is "bad" and they'll disappear sooner or later" - This logic can be applied to literally any product, be it a medicine, a vaccine, or any consumer good. Somehow pharma companies are able to sell any other drug without going into bankruptcy.

Re:Eat Real Food by gowld on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:53PM (#46534376)
Cerebral palsy, a naturally occuring disorder, generates $10M in "malpractice" payouts, part of why giving birth in USA is so expensive.
Re:Eat Real Food by alterom on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:33PM (#46532188)
> We don’t need good vaccines anymore even though infectious diseases are on the rise

To clarify, this is an example of RFK's lunacy, not the user's opinion to be voted on.

Re:Eat Real Food by ekjhgkejhgk on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:24PM (#46532050)
Vaccines being "dangerous" is one of them.
Re:Eat Real Food by binarymax on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:24PM (#46532042)
Staunch anti-vaccine, and he's tearing apart the CDC wit regards to the same.
Re:Eat Real Food by adezxc on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:26PM (#46532088)
Paracetamol causing autism lol
Re:Eat Real Food by jpadkins on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:32PM (#46532182)
But he didn't say that. He cited the studies that said increased Paracetamol during pregnancy correlates with higher rates of autism, and people should know that and be careful. Whenever we discover a link between two things, it's important to share that in a responsible way. It takes years or a decade of research to prove causation, but we should issue warnings once a link is established. A lot of people can be harmed if the government does not publish when it finds harm that correlates with a substance.
Re:Eat Real Food by quentindanjou on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:47PM (#46532435)
> He cited the studies

A preprint citing 2 studies.

With serious studies showing the opposite. You also seem to ignore that fever is a major, and well-proven cause of birth defects and these kinds of fake announcements based on no solid proof could lead part of the population to simply not take any fever-reducing medication by not being knowledgeable on which medicines are NSAID or not.

All of this because of a promise that in the first 6 months of the mandate RFK would find "the great cause of autism", this was not because of a new study suddenly discovered.

Re:Eat Real Food by AlecSchueler on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:40PM (#46532330)
> and people should know that and be careful

This implies a causal relationship.

Re:Eat Real Food by tejohnso on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:02PM (#46532705)
It think it implies uncertainty.
Re:Eat Real Food by gtowey on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @09:11PM (#46536283)
I am uncertain if space aliens will abduct me as I sleep, but it would be insane to factor that into my daily decision making.

This is where it would help if the government would do the responsible thing and quantify the probability and talk about the risks of not taking medicine if you're pregnant and have a high fever. The fact that they aren't is a clear sign that this is absurd propaganda.

Re:Eat Real Food by adezxc on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:59PM (#46532645)
I mean he literally said this, without any citation(!): "There's two studies that show children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism. It's highly likely because they are given Tylenol" [1]

He is continuously spouting non-sense not including aggresive anti-vaccine stance, hydrochloroquine curing COVID-19 and that pesticides makes kids go transgender [2]. Yes, you definitely should know all of that and be careful, because the secretary of health has said so.

[1] - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-circumcision-linked-auti... [2] - https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/01/politics/rfk-jr-fact-chec...

Re:Eat Real Food by FireBeyond on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:54PM (#46532540)
> He cited the studies that said increased Paracetamol during pregnancy correlates with higher rates of autism, and people should know that and be careful.

Don't mealy mouth it. He didn't say anything so nuanced as "be informed and careful".

He actually said it should be "minimized or avoided". Point blank. And then he said it should be "avoided entirely during pregnancy". It was only over a month later, when the WHO was clarifying that there was no conclusive evidence, and that acetaminophen is the safest pain relief to use during pregnancy, that he started suggesting "working with your physician".

Don't present RFK Jr's takes as reasonable. They're not.

> He cited the studies

He cited one fringe study that was discredited because it didn't consider confounding factors.

Re:Eat Real Food by SoftTalker on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:27PM (#46533130)
Not to support this particular but most doctors would advise "minimized or avoided" use of any medication during pregnancy, including OTC meds. Not that there aren't good reasons to sometimes use them, but you probably should not think it's OK to chug Nyquil every time you get a runny nose if you're pregnant.

I personally avoid all meds that aren't prescribed. I haven't taken a Tylenol or Advil or Sudafed or anything like that in years. I take some vitamin supplements and occasionally (but rarely) will use aspirin for a headache.

Re:Eat Real Food by weakfish on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @06:29PM (#46534764)
May I ask why re: your last paragraph? Genuinely curious
Re:Eat Real Food by antonvs on Thursday January 08, 2026 @03:57AM (#46538875)
If you believe there might a real issue there, you've been misled. That's the danger of having people like RFK in a position of authority: it makes people who don't understand the issues much more likely to listen to them. Which is bad for everyone.
Re:Eat Real Food by jjcm on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:31PM (#46532158)
Anti-vaccine, anti-tylenol, stating that circumcision causes autism, stating wireless 5G damages DNA, stating that vaccines are part of a anti-black conspiracy, hiv/aids denialism, believing that contrails are actually chemtrails, etc etc etc.
Re:Eat Real Food by TehCorwiz on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:38PM (#46532303)
Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:48PM (#46534327)
The Cato.org one is interesting because it only speculates what might have influenced him, then attempts to debunk those sources.

Obviously I feel like he should be providing his sources.

Re:Eat Real Food by TehCorwiz on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @06:09PM (#46534568)
I chose that source intentionally to underscore that nobody on any part of the political spectrum is actually contesting he said or believes these things. Regardless of how they choose to view them.
Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:34PM (#46532211)
Can you link to your strongest source for one of those claims?
Re:Eat Real Food by Carp on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:38PM (#46532291)
Re:Eat Real Food by thrance on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:28PM (#46532110)
Antivax, avocated against pasteurization, thinks fries are healthy when fried in beef tallow, swam in sewers with his grandkids to prove the human body is naturally immune to diseases and vaccines are unnecessary, tried to ban paracetamol based on bad research linking it to autism, and much more if you care to dig a little.
Re:Eat Real Food by mandelbrotwurst on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:47PM (#46532444)
> swam in sewers with his grandkids

This is wildly inaccurate. He was photographed wading in Rock Creek in Washington, D.C, behavior prohibited by the parks service due to high levels of bacteria, yes. Is it a sewer? No.

Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:36PM (#46532259)
He's never been anti-vax, though he has advocated for better data about vaccines with good reason--it's abominable. He's advocated against requiring milk to be pasteurized. One of the few reasonable datasets suggesting it doesn't help is the amish. The other ones sound weird so I will indeed dig a little.
Re:Eat Real Food by FireBeyond on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:09PM (#46532835)
Show us all how all the data on vaccines is "abominable".
Re:Eat Real Food by cosmicgadget on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:05PM (#46533727)
Don't you remember how everyone who got a covid vaccine died off two years later?
Re:Eat Real Food by hairofadog on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @04:55PM (#46533592)
While he moderates his take on it depending on who his audience is, he has said "There's no vaccine that is safe and effective."

https://apnews.com/article/rfk-kennedy-election-2024-preside...

Re:Eat Real Food by codeka on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:23PM (#46533970)
> One of the few reasonable datasets suggesting it doesn't help is the amish

When you literally live on the farm where the cow is milked, there is less benefit to pasteurization, yes. Unless you want us to live like the Amish, then let's keep our pasteurized milk, OK?

Re:Eat Real Food by lithocarpus on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @08:05PM (#46535662)
Some of us do want to live near where our food comes from and eat it fresh. I haven't seen anyone advocating that pasteurization should be banned, just that raw milk should be un-banned.
Re:Eat Real Food by tomcam on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @05:40PM (#46534203)
Should we be forced to drink pasteurized milk?
Re:Eat Real Food by thrance on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @07:00PM (#46535092)
You were never forced to, don't change the subject. Issue is with the secretary of health spreading obvious lies about pasteurization, a process that saved countless lives over the course of more than a century.
[dead]
Re:Eat Real Food by rafram on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @08:51PM (#46536095)
> The distance between the therapeutic and liver toxic doses is too small for kids, less than 2.5x the max recommended dose

If you’re giving your kid 2.5x the listed maximum dose of a medication, that’s on you.

> a hepatotoxic dose for my 5 year old based on their weight is just 3/4 of the adult daily max recommended dose

Sure, and even a small drink of alcohol can poison a kid. Something being OK for adults doesn’t make it OK for kids. Read the packaging.

Re:Eat Real Food by ericd on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @09:49PM (#46536584)
It causes >100k cases of poisoning in the US every year. RTFM isn't working.
Re:Eat Real Food by nancyminusone on Wednesday January 07, 2026 @03:25PM (#46532061)
It's true - none of his conspiracy theories involve the moon directly.