News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by passwordoops on Thursday November 30, 2023 @06:14PM (#38480604)
So "Q" is to AI projects what "i" was to everything in 2009-ish?
Re: by adriaanb on Thursday November 30, 2023 @06:20PM (#38480660)
The name comes from "Google Dorking", but replaced Google with Q since it's basically query search string dorking :) Nothing to do with the current Q-hype!
Re: by spacebacon on Thursday November 30, 2023 @09:53PM (#38482471)
Operation redefine Q within a reasonable objective reality for the sake of mental health.
Re: by kylecazar on Thursday November 30, 2023 @06:32PM (#38480782)
Neat! I am still not sure exactly how Google's 'Country' filter works.
Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:20AM (#38483768)
Google uses different ways to decide if a webpage belongs to a specific country. Like domain name, search console country setting, server location, language, etc. Not sure if it's always 100% accurate...
Re: by kylecazar on Saturday December 02, 2023 @04:56PM (#38502450)
Gotcha.. this makes sense. I was hung up on what they even meant by a website belonging to a particular country (as if we're all patriotically running sites on local servers or something).
Re: by nhggfu on Friday December 01, 2023 @09:01AM (#38486728)
via the gl=[2 letter country code] url parameter, i believe.

(Also useful is the ?pws=0 flag [to remove personalization])

Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @12:08PM (#38489177)
I didn't knew about pws and just added it! Thanks.

For country, I am using cr and language the cl query param.

Re: by geraldwhen on Thursday November 30, 2023 @06:40PM (#38480858)
Google is objectively worse than all other search engines. I don’t know why I would want to search Google more.
Re: by uneekname on Thursday November 30, 2023 @07:28PM (#38481281)
I disagree, Google finds what I'm looking for more frequently than any other search engines I've tried. And I say this as someone who is looking to use Google less!
Re: by gumballindie on Thursday November 30, 2023 @07:37PM (#38481364)
What is the alternative? Chat gpt and clones are rather wrong most of the time.
Re: by gerwim on Friday December 01, 2023 @07:30AM (#38485967)
I use Phind[0]. It's great addition to the regular search engine.

[0]: https://phind.com

Re: by Terretta on Friday December 01, 2023 @08:15AM (#38486295)
kagi.com which is subscription instead of advertising so they understand who the customer is and what product they are selling to whom

// to be clear, google understands what product they are selling to whom as well -- it's just not search to you

Re: by geraldwhen on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:20PM (#38490966)
Yandex is my go-to for harder to find items, and other than that I use DDG. Google never gives good results.
Re: by adriaanb on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:10AM (#38498375)
The idea is to write one query and be able to view results on the major search engines. I have to investigate the supported advanced search feature for each first...
Re: by koolba on Thursday November 30, 2023 @07:48PM (#38481463)
How is it even possible to make a website this impossible to use on mobile?

I would expect any default layout to flow properly. It’s just a bunch of inputs. But it simply does not work.

Re: by spacebacon on Thursday November 30, 2023 @09:52PM (#38482456)
Blame viewport meta… I’m sure it’s an easy fix but author probably prefers components in place.
Re: by adaboese on Thursday November 30, 2023 @08:16PM (#38481687)
Related to this, does anyone a good way to search only for articles?

I have a use case that requires that I only surface search results that are articles (news, blog posts, etc) rather than anything else.

The best I've gotten to so far is doing queries such as inurl:blog

Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @12:49AM (#38483609)
I have added the source operator for you, so you can search in specific news source. Like: https://qdorks.com/q/RW69pYt754wX

Just add sources and change the keywords to your liking.

Re: by mistermann on Thursday November 30, 2023 @08:31PM (#38481829)
Some more options between last month and last year would be lovely, one of my main pet peeves about Google search.
Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:25AM (#38483802)
There are some options for date-ranges, but haven't implemented this yet. Will dive into it and add something more flexible!
Re: by therein on Thursday November 30, 2023 @09:19PM (#38482221)
This looks nice, no complaints there.

But all of this just for Google to ignore the advanced query parameters and show me something else it thinks I want is unfortunate.

Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:23AM (#38483779)
It is not always 100% accurate, but still pretty good after a number of different tries.
Re: by fraXis on Thursday November 30, 2023 @09:39PM (#38482357)
Great job! Please add/create a colorful favicon to the site so I can save it in my Google "bookmarks bar" without the name. Right now, it looks like this with a dark theme:

https://imgur.com/a/SNmzISI

Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:24AM (#38483792)
Thanks, and that indeed looks a bit sad. Going on the hunt for something more colourful and let you know!
Re: by adriaanb on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @09:13AM (#38530928)
I just added a new icon, much better. Thanks for the tip!

https://qdorks.com

Re: by erhaetherth on Friday December 01, 2023 @12:35AM (#38483539)
The Country select box should allow you to type characters when it's focused. The native <select> will do this out of the box.
Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:12AM (#38483726)
Good catch! I had a look, and it didn't work because of the flags, moving them after the country names fixed it. Thanks!
Re: by victorbjorklund on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:49AM (#38484243)
Doesnt seem to work on safari on iOS. Not responsive design and nothing happens when I press search button. Great idea though!
Re: by adriaanb on Friday December 01, 2023 @03:35AM (#38484527)
Thanks for letting me know, going to fix this asap!
Re: by doctaj on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:49AM (#38488124)
Same for iOS Firefox
Re: by matthews2 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:16AM (#38498412)
Firefox on iOS is just Safari in different clothes. Same engine.
Re: by akikoo on Friday December 01, 2023 @04:25AM (#38484848)
Looks like it's missing the verbatim search?

tbs=li:1

Re: by quickthrower2 on Friday December 01, 2023 @05:55AM (#38485398)
It is a great idea. It feels like a feature missing from Google (and probably impossible for Google to deliver being hampered by material design)
Re: by arshxyz on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:01PM (#38489938)
Google did make something like this: https://www.google.com/advanced_search

It has a lot of options, even allows you to search ONLY the Text/Title/URL and you can filter by usage right (free for personal/commercial use etc)

Interestingly it was last updated before material design was a thing. Maybe it's nostalgia but I love the design language of Google had before material injected padding everywhere.

Re: by sa-code on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:48PM (#38491320)
That's a good point about padding. In trying to make their UIs "cleaner" they've made content impossible to fit unless you're maximized on a 27" screen (which is presumably how they develop)