It seems wasteful, I know, but it's nice to have competition at least.
I have choice of half a dozen suppliers this way but only one set of hardware in the house.
That's what you get when you let your politicians sell you out to monopolists.
With the shift to cloud computing, at least in the awkward hybrid phase, that won't suffice for a business of that size, but it really isn't obvious what a single person would _need_ a gigabit connection for. Perhaps you can elaborate.
The download part is great because now it's faster to buy a game on steam for instance and download it than getting in the car, driving to the closest store to purchase a physical copy and bring it home.
Regarding the upload, I built a small utility that stores the videos from the cameras I have at home to the cloud in a rolling window (I didn't want to pay the service from the cameras provider). So at any time I am uploading something like 7 1080p streams (it's more bursty as I chunk the streams every 10 minutes and upload the resulting files). So, while 1Gb is still an overkill, once you have the bandwidth you find uses for it.
On the one hand, I have two competing cable providers (RCN/Astound and Comcast/Xfinity). Being able to swap between services as offers change has been huge (hey, competition is a thing!) Currently I’ve got 1400/40 (measured) on Xfinity.
But fiber? Totally absent. AT&T seems to serve other areas nearby but not mine. Why? No clue. But I’d sure love having a symmetric connection.
Incidentally, there are multiple fiber cables strung on the poles in the alley behind my house. Presumably they are the infrastructure for our two cables cos.
It's cheaper than Ziggo' coax though (300 mb).
To be honest, I still have to research that.
I too am in Australia
Proportion of urban population 92.57%
https://www.statista.com/statistics/276724/urbanization-in-t...
People forget. The numbers tell a really great story.
You could have a gigantic nation which is completely centralized into one city, giving you a super low population density on paper.
It's not the case in any of your example, so not really an issue here. Nonetheless...
Only trying to provide context for the economics of density in places like Singapore and the a Netherlands, not necessarily prove the opposite use case. I just wanted to highlight a contrasting factor that is very important for fiber and other high speed service viability. There are many others!
These criticisms are totally valid.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/260498/degree-of-urbaniz...
The base 300/300 service is price capped at 38 euros/month as well. I'm paying a few bucks more for higher speed.
We have a pretty different scale in a lot of ways: Australia is huge and basically empty, density wise.
It's a bit annoying to find, everything is hidden behind area code filters.
> (semi-)rural
Pick one.
How many hundered km are you from the nearest settlement of >10,000 people?
People in England, Netherlands, etc don't really get what remote means.