What a surprise. The government got your taxes AND screwed you with inflation over time.
Then COVID happened and they had to print more, postponing and aggravating the crisis.
Now it's time to pay and nobody will take the blame.
When are people going to rebel?
That is intentional - part of you will own nothing and you will be happy - programme run by World Economic Forum and their politicians they penetrated governments with.
Many people still don't believe it and develop cognitive dissonance, saying it's not happening, it's a conspiracy theory, despite having their own savings disappear, being able to afford less and less and so on.
Ironically, talking about them as if they're engineering the future of Europe is probably the only thing anybody can possibly do to give them any kind of impact.
The solution to housing affordability is to build more housing. It's not complicated. But people who own housing today have a vested interest in preventing new housing development.
This is a common way people use to rationalise it. But how do you think decisions are made when there is group of people where each one has a part to play to execute a policy? The word you are looking for is a meeting. People meet, discuss, share concerns and agree plan. At this level, this is not something you can do over a Zoom call as you don't know who may be in the room and there are other security risks to consider. So they organise ComicCon, in a semi-open fashion. After all, what pleb like me and you can do about it?
Even if you write online, like I do, you can see I am getting dismissed, often ridiculed and often ad hominem follow as well.
They can totally do it and there is nothing people can do about it, so they don't even have to hide that much.
The social club is convened for the purpose of high status people deciding how to influence the direction of the World Economy. It isn't a literature club. Their consensus opinions and the voices in the room matter a lot.
> .. people talk about the WEF ... rather than the actual policy makers
The names aren't a mystery. Klaus Schwab organises the thing. Lists of the politicians and businessmen are published. It is easier to say WEF than to say "9 of the 10 wealthiest people except Adani". Especially since Adani still attends some of the meetups.
https://qz.com/davos-2023-world-economic-forum-attendees-184...
They aren't going for the merch. They are there to lobby and influence, dare I say, the World Economy.
I mean, https://www.weforum.org/focus/the-great-reset . They're not talking about the weather. They're looking at the future and coordinating a response.
EDIT https://www.weforum.org/great-reset was a better link.
Because that misses the points just as much as it does in describing the WEF. There is coordination going on beyond the official powers of the organisation. The organisation exists to coordinate political action!
The WEF itself would starkly disagree.
For more than 50 years, the Forum has engaged global Partners to drive significant impact – creating historic initiatives, industry breakthroughs, economic solutions and tens of thousands of projects and collaborations – improving the state of the world
That's a lot more than arranging name tags.
The only “power” they have is limited to what participants can or can’t do while attending. Such as: they have the power to require attendees wear their name tags as a condition for attending.
(Not sure if that’s actually a thing; it’s merely illustrative)
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment...
All the "theories" I've seen conveniently forget about China & India - the world's largest population by a long shot. How does these conspiracy of WEF impact them?
Until I see something that doesn't have a "me" complex as the main reasoning I'm going to dismiss it.
To give two examples relating to China and India here was a thread very recently that mentioned how the Mexican cartels are making inroads in the US, succesfully corrupting some police union and that cartel was also in cahoots with the chinese as thats where they were sourcing their fentanyl from.
There is also the Indian Brahmin conspiracy where they favor each other over other castes even abroad.
Both of these are real and established. But it's also clear that neither of them are all-powerful.
In fact, Indian Brahmin would seem to contradict with WEF's supposed goals.
wrt Mexican cartels, I'm not sure how that fits into the original narrative of WEF - do Mexican cartels work for the WEF? I've never heard this theory before.
I don't see why any of the groups mentioned would submit themselves to endgoals WEF is supposedly aiming for. I'm skeptical why they would.
At the very least you could compare it to an industry trade show, like an annual convention of trial attorneys or of insurance adjusters, which is a key vector for introducing and spreading new concepts and ideas in those industries.
Which one was architected? It can't really be both.
Low interest and money printing to bail out big companies and their CEO buddies. Most of that money printing goes into assets bubbles.
its not even trying to hide any of this, you can still find it on the web
this was the goal of Lenin and Trotsky - complete destruction of the idea of the individual person
as one woman on YouTube commented - Agenda21 is a conspiracy, but its definitely not a theory
WEF seems to have become a later-day manifestation of Agenda21
Untrue.
Maybe we’ve read different versions, can you point to where it calls for a single global government and currency?
> this was the goal of Lenin and Trotsky - complete destruction of the idea of the individual person
You're right UN Agenda 21 _is_ available on the web. Have you actually read it - or have you only read opinions on it?
I have read it and I think you're taking a VERY big leap of faith to connect the dots this way.
If they're trying to destroy the idea of the individual person, what is the end goal? ie. 2023 you say they're going to destroy the idea of the individual person. 2030 they succeed. 2035 ?????
There are other factors boosting real estate prices -- more people desiring to live alone, ease of renting an unused property via Airbnb, people living longer, massive wealth generation via stock markets -- but a low-rate environment offers existing wealth much more leverage to grow.
As far as I'm aware, most places are 'non-recourse'. Some people might say "if you can carry on making the payments you'll be fine". This isn't true though. Not being able to move city for a job, being unable to upgrade to a larger place to start a family, or feeling financial pressure to stay in an unhealthy relationship are all very real potential problems.