News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by cwkoss on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @05:43PM (#35175138)
Alternately (or additionally), I'd love for regulatory prohibition of implied ownership of these sorts of items.

Ex. if access is revokable, it's illegal to use the word "Buy" alone - have to use "Rent" or "License" or "Buy License" or something that doesn't imply ownership (because ownership is not being offered)

Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by madeofpalk on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @06:48PM (#35175773)
I don't feel like this is a meaningful change.

If steam changed all the "Buy" to "Rent" on it's website, nothing would actually change.

Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by paulryanrogers on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @06:57PM (#35175849)
Customers would be informed. Many would leave for GOG.com
Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by madeofpalk on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:52PM (#35176315)
I do not think customer behaviour would change that much.
Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @09:37PM (#35177090)
Then Amazon has no reason to resist this change!
Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by paulryanrogers on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @09:58PM (#35177236)
Words are powerful. See how hard they fight the legislation.
Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by bruce511 on Thursday March 16, 2023 @12:00AM (#35177998)
I think it would change, but Rent is also not the right word.

I'm familiar with Rent and I intuit what it means. I have access to an asset for a limited time, and then I can choose to continue renting it, or not. The decision is in my hands.

License might be a better word. Because what they're selling is a "one time payment for use of this asset for an undetermined amount of time" - that's not "buy" but it's also not "rent".

When my license ends it's likely I can't get another. Certainly its not my decision to make.

The period of the license us unknown - till you block my account, till you go under, till you decide this service is no longer available, till _your_ license-to-license expires, and so on.

So yeah, I don't think it's Rent.

Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by Dylan16807 on Thursday March 16, 2023 @01:58AM (#35178644)
> then I can choose to continue renting it, or not. The decision is in my hands.

That is not implied by the term rent. Very often rentals are for a fixed amount of time. Especially for video game rentals, back when they were common.

I think rent implies you have limited control better than license does.

Re:Epic Games to Pay $245M for Tricking Users into Making Un... by navane on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @07:58PM (#35176365)
Its funny how Buy is actually Rent, like how Steal is actually Copy.