Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by jacobsenscott on Thursday February 09, 2023 @03:46PM
(#34731174)
Needing at least 3 round trips to establish an ssl connection to the alien internet - things won't get interesting for a few thousand years.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by knowledgepowers on Thursday February 09, 2023 @04:09PM
(#34731504)
"Responded" could be execution of payload.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Thursday February 09, 2023 @05:38PM
(#34732690)
* * *
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by nocoiner on Friday February 10, 2023 @12:54AM
(#34736140)
So many of my favorite references in this thread. I was delighted to find Neuromancer at the top of the comments, and this here.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @06:25AM
(#34738301)
s/just/exactly
But 'Interesting. Please continue?'
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @10:50AM
(#34741219)
The implication is that the AI follows instructions to make contact but the human operators then misinterpret the results as static.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @11:07AM
(#34741537)
Hm. That wasn't what I've been referring to.
Near the end of the movie Contact, where two higher ranking TLA-agents discuss the lack of evidence for the things the protagonist told, which allegedly happened to her, but weren't captured on anything.
Out of my head...One: 'Bla bla bla.' The other: 'Bla bla just static.' One: 'Yes, exactly 18 hours of static.' The other: 'Continue...' Or something like ironically: 'Interesting. Please continue?'
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @02:33PM
(#34744569)
Yes and my implication was that if we replaced those TLA agents with an AGI then the "Interesting. Please continue." might not be asked by a human, or at all because it is "just" (merely, not barely) static.
Here is the scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeUuFHGj6TM.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Saturday February 11, 2023 @12:22AM
(#34749835)
Whoa! I remembered that so wrong. Sorry ;->
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by Red_Leaves_Flyy on Thursday February 09, 2023 @08:16PM
(#34734330)
Are you suggesting an arbitrary celestial signal containing a payload that can execute on heretofore unknown hardware/software of virtually any progeny? Conceivable? Sure. Also about as likely as chatgpt solving the remaining millennium prize problems or spitting out an algorithm to efficiently reverse selected public Bitcoin addresses to their private keys in actionable time. That said, an extraterrestrial object of artificial origin that could interface and hijack wireless communication devices is far more plausible.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by dylan604 on Thursday February 09, 2023 @04:49PM
(#34732036)
i'm sure an AI SSL version would be much more efficient than 3 round trips. after all, it's supposed to be smarter than what we could make, right?
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by arthurcolle on Thursday February 09, 2023 @05:37PM
(#34732682)
something something quantum entanglement blockchain AI?
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by randmeerkat on Thursday February 09, 2023 @06:24PM
(#34733210)
> something something quantum entanglement blockchain AI?
You need Rust in there somewhere.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by chimen on Thursday February 09, 2023 @07:12PM
(#34733692)
"written in Rust"
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by marcosdumay on Thursday February 09, 2023 @09:47PM
(#34735025)
Nah, a superhuman AI would be smart enough to not need Rust.