AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals

Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @06:25AM (#34738301)

s/just/exactly

But 'Interesting. Please continue?'

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @10:50AM (#34741219)

The implication is that the AI follows instructions to make contact but the human operators then misinterpret the results as static.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @11:07AM (#34741537)

Hm. That wasn't what I've been referring to.

Near the end of the movie Contact, where two higher ranking TLA-agents discuss the lack of evidence for the things the protagonist told, which allegedly happened to her, but weren't captured on anything.

Out of my head...One: 'Bla bla bla.' The other: 'Bla bla just static.' One: 'Yes, exactly 18 hours of static.' The other: 'Continue...' Or something like ironically: 'Interesting. Please continue?'

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @02:33PM (#34744569)

Yes and my implication was that if we replaced those TLA agents with an AGI then the "Interesting. Please continue." might not be asked by a human, or at all because it is "just" (merely, not barely) static.

Here is the scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeUuFHGj6TM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals by LargoLasskhyfv on Saturday February 11, 2023 @12:22AM (#34749835)

Whoa! I remembered that so wrong. Sorry ;->

[ Parent | on HN ]