Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Thursday February 09, 2023 @05:38PM
(#34732690)
* * *
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by nocoiner on Friday February 10, 2023 @12:54AM
(#34736140)
So many of my favorite references in this thread. I was delighted to find Neuromancer at the top of the comments, and this here.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @06:25AM
(#34738301)
s/just/exactly
But 'Interesting. Please continue?'
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @10:50AM
(#34741219)
The implication is that the AI follows instructions to make contact but the human operators then misinterpret the results as static.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday February 10, 2023 @11:07AM
(#34741537)
Hm. That wasn't what I've been referring to.
Near the end of the movie Contact, where two higher ranking TLA-agents discuss the lack of evidence for the things the protagonist told, which allegedly happened to her, but weren't captured on anything.
Out of my head...One: 'Bla bla bla.' The other: 'Bla bla just static.' One: 'Yes, exactly 18 hours of static.' The other: 'Continue...' Or something like ironically: 'Interesting. Please continue?'
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by mulmen on Friday February 10, 2023 @02:33PM
(#34744569)
Yes and my implication was that if we replaced those TLA agents with an AGI then the "Interesting. Please continue." might not be asked by a human, or at all because it is "just" (merely, not barely) static.
Here is the scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeUuFHGj6TM.
Re:AI Joins Hunt for ET: Study Finds 8 Potential Alien Signals
by LargoLasskhyfv on Saturday February 11, 2023 @12:22AM
(#34749835)
Whoa! I remembered that so wrong. Sorry ;->