https://www.leviton.com/en/products/residential/usb-wall-out...
It will eliminate a bulky adapter and let me use the plug for things that actually need AC, like my toaster or kettle.
One wonders if it will start becoming common to have all plugs in newer/refab houses have these and they will be okay enough for most people.
This is a little different then what your talking about, but both could be the norm. I imagine the form of what your talking about would be that power strips with a bunch of type - c ports on them (and maybe some AC) replace the power strips we use now.
https://old.reddit.com/r/UsbCHardware/comments/t4l1dr/levito...
I really wonder about those.
I remember reading an article where someone tested a bunch of different power bricks and found that they really vary in quality.
The cheap ones had really bad voltage sag and other problems. And they were an unsafe design (not enough separation between the AC and DC sides).
Personally, I'd trust an anker or apple brick more than whatever lowest bidder device is in those outlets.
Edit: LOL these are going to be $90 a pop. Just get one of these instead: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0874GDG93/
1. the USB C plug is here to stay for a longer while
2. with 240W we've already reached power delivery levels that exceed most small appliances you'd want to hook up like that; most larger appliances will take mains. 240W is a practical limit because if you go much above that, the consideration isn't really how much power can your device suck out of the wall, the consideration becomes: if you hold this thing in your hand, will it burn you? You can't escape the physics: 240W power dissipated means 240W power coming out of your device as heat.
3. we've just reached a new, more reliable and more power efficient semiconductor process (GaN) which only happens once every decade or two, so anything made in the next 20 years or so at the least will have roughly the same kind of performance, and anything in the next 50 years or so will probably not exceed it by unacceptable levels
However, now it's a good idea to go with these because it's unlikely power delivery for a lot of things will increase for a long while - see my other comment.
I've been converting some of my more problematic devices, for example here's a pretty clean conversion I did of my Wii U Gamepad back in the day. That was before USB C ports and cables were easily available, so I went with micro. USB C wasn't even a consideration back then.
I have a dozen USB-C PD bricks of various brands. Only 3 of them properly provide 12v, and one of those only does it properly when there are no other devices plugged in to it’s 3 ports.
Personally I would love to use USB-C PD for longer strings of 12V APA RGB LEDs as interior lights. In that case: not only is voltage a concern but also total wattage, heat, and long-term reliability. Is 60 or even 100W through a boost converter actually safe and easy?
If a circuit is in itself safe (it might not be if it's executed poorly), then safety of the whole device depends on how you're using that circuit.
100W is just as fine as 1W. It just depends on whether you're being scammed. If you don't have the knowledge to find out whether what you're doing is safe... don't do it.
The issue so far is that for higher power levels or voltages the electronics are still complex and expensive, even with the PD standards, so it adds a lot of cost doing it that way compared to a typical barrel connector.
Maybe in another 4-5 years and with some standardized and hopefully dirt cheap PD chips?
Contrast your typical $10 AC power strip, which lets you plug in 10,000 watts of hair dryers at once, because it's understood that a circuit breaker will (hopefully) blow if you do. It doesn't need to be smart.
I think the basic problem is whether USB-PD allows a source to commit to delivering 100 watts to a port that asked for 20V/5A, but then notice that the port only needs 2 watts right now (because the device finished charging), so that it can reclaim 98 watts in its total power budget. So far I haven't seen a power supply that does this well.
If a USB-PD over commits, then the devices it tries to power will obviously get less power than advertised, or the internal over-delivering protections trigger and the source shuts down. The user will (maybe) notice and can do something about it.
I'm pretty sure everybody understands that you can't just plug 6 high power consumers in one USB device just because it has 6 ports and it supports USB-PD, just like people don't plug 6 kettles in one extension cord.
A good example of the problem is a hypothetical USB-PD power strip that has 5 ports. The Amazon listing says it can deliver 120 watts. A person buys it, thinking they can use it for their 100-watt laptop and four other small things that each need barely 5 watts, 1 x 100 + 4 x 5 = 120, so the math adds up. They're still working from home post-pandemic, so they leave their laptop plugged in all the time on their desk. The laptop charges for maybe 45 minutes each day, but it still tells the power supply that it needs 20V x 5A = 100W constantly, and each of the small devices asks for the minimum of 5V x 3A = 15W.
For actual USB-PD supplies I've bought in this approximate situation, the laptop won't charge because the supply can't promise 100W. You hook up your Kill-A-Watt and find that the supply is actually drawing only 20 watts. The power supply is keeping all its promises -- 15W to each of four small devices, meaning it can't agree to supply 100W to the fifth device. So it instead says it can do maybe 12V x 3A for the laptop, which says forget about it and refuses to charge. Yeah, the laptop sucks for lying that it needs 100W 24/7, but what am I going to do? Get a new laptop? Or just put the USB-PD supply on a shelf and return to a regular old AC power strip with five individual USB transformers plugged into it? That's what I'll do, because that's what works.
In today's world, the "If" in your comment happens at the AC circuit-breaker level. In the USB-PD world, it would happen at the level of this little multi-port power supply. Your average consumer in a hurry doesn't want to be bothered by this kind of detail.
It's a bad laptop design. An iPad or Android phone/tablet can fast charge with a good supply or slow charge with a cheap one. The laptop should do the same, accept whatever the supply can deliver.
Also, what's the problem with the user using 5 individual small USB chargers versus a big one? The efficiency of all USB chargers is about the same, so it doesn't matter how you split them up. In fact, a small USB charger working at maximum output is more efficient than a large one working at 20% load.
You are correct that ideally the USB-PD supply should monitor the actual usage and route power accordingly, but I'm not sure it's such a problem in practice.
:) This thread started with iamchp asking about "single multi-port USB-C PD converters."
The laptop should [...] accept whatever the supply can deliver.
And both sides should renegotiate when available/needed power changes. If a laptop could say "I could use 240W but I can deal with 18W," a supply said "I can give you only 18W, but I'll let you know when I can give you 240W," and the laptop later said "you know what? Now I really need only 36W," then I think USB-PD would be good. My experience is the negotiation happens once, possibly days earlier, when the device is first plugged in.
(By the way, it's not always the right product decision to include boosting circuitry from lower-voltage supplies. While a MacBook will charge from a 5-volt supply, you'll be sad when it dies during a critical work presentation even though it's charging, because the presentation needed more than 15 watts. It's a defensible product decision to require a minimum wattage, and thus effectively a minimum voltage, or refuse to charge.)
As for the refusing to charge, my ThinkPad on Windows will alert me when the dock or power source isn't putting out enough power for it to maintain the current power usage trend.
If a device was granted a 100W budget, but only needs 2W now, maybe it suddenly needs to burst up to the full 100W? If the hub reclaimed those other 98W, now it can't deliver what it promised, so something fails to work, or gets powered off.
In the hair-dryer case, all six actually do turn on -- but only for a few seconds. The circuit breaker heats up and trips before the wires in the wall get hot enough to ignite the wood. Which sounds scary, but that's part of the design that enables normal spiky power usage of refrigerator compressors starting up, running a garbage disposal for a few seconds, etc., without constantly tripping a home's breakers.
If USB-PD has some way for a single supply to "overbook" its commitments, then it could model this system. Otherwise, its competition will be people plugging lots of individual USB power supplies to AC power strips, which is bulky and wasteful, but extremely functional.
A few years back, I really wished all the AC/DC converters for smaller home appliances would ditch the fragmented round pins, and go for a universal USB-A (at the time) standard. E.g. some fans, routers, my smart desk, my key light, etc. Perhaps we would be able to optimize better unified AC/DC converters.
Perhaps it would be nice to think about something like this. Instead of having bulky AC/DC converters, go for single multi-port USB-C PD converters?