I find it much preferable to North American sites like https://realtor.ca that think that number of baths is more important than floorspace (which to my utter amazement is often not even available).
There are sometimes rare jewels published directly by individuals on immoweb.be but the bulk of the offers is trash.
Selling though is a completely different story it's almost impossible without an agent. And they do provide a valuable service; like photo session, publishing on funda and others, taking care of house-viewing etc.,
Even houses can be difficult in many cases.
This is something I noticed last time I was apartment hunting in Montréal. You'd see a sign or listing, call, and the number would be out of service. As if landlords were using virtual numbers/call forwarding services and just shutting it off once the unit was rented.
I don't call phone numbers on listing sites anymore, even if there's a face and an agency next to it. Better off looking up the agency, going to their website an calling that number (which in all three cases of the above, were different than the one on Zillow).
---
* by "interesting set of experiences" I mean calling the number on a listing took me to an automated menu and a robotic voice where I had to enter the street number, and then first five letters of a street name so it could "look up" the property I was inquiring about, and connect me to the right seller.
Hanging up on that nonsense immediately and calling the leasing agency's number via their website got me a human being in two rings, and the leasing agent for the unit I was interested in after about 45 seconds of hold music.
This is strange, wasn't my experience at all. Just about every house I viewed through funda was advertised by agents. And when I put up my house for sale the first thing the agent did was to publish on funda. All the agents care about is selling a house they get a hefty sum (0.3% if I remember correctly) and are totally fine advertising on funda.
As a house seeker I dealt with a bunch of agents and the experience wasn't all that bad to be honest. Mind you all this was in early 2019; from what I hear late 2020 onwards the market has gone bananas in the Netherlands and Amsterdam in particular.
- paid searches (even at other agents)
- unpaid searches at their own agency
- social media
- agency website
- funda
each step would be on the next day, so if you're only watching funda, you're already four days behind
Think it’s all related apartments and houses not really being fungible.
ESIT: Also, more directly to GP’s experience, when I was in the market in NL I found the biggest aggregator to be very useful, which is apparently different from their experience: funda.nl
https://www.statista.com/statistics/257344/top-lobbying-spen...
This is how capitalism works when there is no government helping monopolies to form in the name of security / justice / anti-money laundering / insert-politician-buzzword-of-the-day.
The natural end condition of an unregulated market is a monopoly. That is why we need regulation.
So, something is operating to provide implicit regulation. In this case it seems like chaos serves that role. Monopoly relies on a self-ordering property common to most market conditions.
From the agent's perspective, it's good to drive people to their company's website rather than one of the big aggregate ones. Having more people visit it means they're more likely to do business with that company specifically. Getting people to visit your company's site is pretty straightforward: they put up ads there earlier, often so much earlier that by the time you see an ad on an aggregate site, it's already fully booked for viewings.
And that's how we end up with dozens of different company sites, each crappy in their own way, and in the middle of it all, people trying to find a home pulling their hair out, refreshing a bunch of different websites every few hours.