I don't have any questions at the moment - I'm still absorbing information from AI Addict: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByKE6RZjYes
He probably signed an NDA for it (by joining it before 10.2), and I'm grateful that he isn't following the likely-unenforceable NDA.
It was a bit of a joke but there is some truth to it.
Do you think only civilians use the internet connection he provided? The troops that Nato trained for the past 8 or so years rely on uninterrupted internet connections as well.
Teslas are a perfect mobile surveillance tool with cameras, GPS, remote control capabilities, etc...
It's not a stretch to expect they could easily be used as ground versions of aerial drones with the benefit of plausable deniability (FSD Beta did it).
Oh my god he's spreading internet somewhere nato wants it. Definitely willing to kill, yep yep.
During a bear market or temporary downturn induced squeeze, these sort of relationships and contracts may not just seem more attractive but financially necessary.
No need to put it that way as if you don't understand the priorities.
We'll check back in a few years and see if I'm wrong about the trajectory. Btw, I've been right about most tech companies, 2013-2015 leaks made that clear.
But priority doesn't really matter when they're selling the same thing they sell to everyone else, and it's a small sliver of their business.
Making a military-spec computer vision system is very different from providing internet to many people including a military.
Priority does matter and it should be common sense that connecting an army to the internet is a higher priority than connecting civilians, especially during a conflict/war.
Let's be serious, anyone reading this thread will understand the point that you seem to be trying to avoid.
An NDA is not appropriate as an argument here.
Not having an NDA would be inappropriate for any beta tester of a proprietary product, regardless of the location in which their testing primarily occurs.
For context, NDA's are extremely common - in my experience, you can scarcely have a coffee chat with a tech employee at their office without signing one.
Today I learned that some people in this industry are fine with NDAs and onerous terms of services for "cool" companies.
I don't see whats wrong with the action taken though. He probably agreed to these terms and then he broke them. Whether he was aware that he was going against his own agreement or not is out of the question. I don't like Tesla as a company or a car manufacturer (nothing personal, I just wouldnt buy their cars) and I agree that this response was probably to be expected by anyone who was aware of the terms surrounding their employment and the internal beta access that position grants them.