News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by jzer0cool on Saturday March 12, 2022 @01:44PM (#30653689)
What free or (non-free) DNS services is everyone using?
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by ftobin on Saturday March 12, 2022 @04:57PM (#30655311)
Cloudflare's malware blocking service is my go-to. 1.1.1.2, supporting DoH and DoT. I prefer them over Quad9 because Google blog post listed several malware domains and Quad9 only caught half, while Cloudflare caught them all. https://www.reddit.com/r/Quad9/comments/t9b9v1/quad9_not_cat...
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by benbristow on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:54PM (#30656326)
1.1.1.1 is good but it has a bit of an annoying issue where it won't resolve archive.is/archive.today names.

It's been discussed before

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828317

I use that site quite often so it makes it a bit of a no-go.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by seanhunter on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:15AM (#30660232)
I am on 1.1.1.1 and it resolves archive.is just fine. I seemingly can't view a number of pages there because of "no cipher overlap" if I turn on https-only but that is not a cloudflare dns problem.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by charcircuit on Saturday March 12, 2022 @11:21PM (#30657934)
Both archive.is and archive.today resolve for me with 1.1.1.1.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by dorianmariefr on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:07PM (#30655904)
I think you meant 1.1.1.1 even though https://1.1.1.2/ redirects to 1.1.1.1
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by iampims on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:14PM (#30655957)
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by kingcharles on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:12PM (#30655941)
No, I just checked, 1.1.1.1 resolves everything.

1.1.1.2 & 1.0.0.2 are their malware-blocking servers.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by teddyh on Saturday March 12, 2022 @01:50PM (#30653747)
Run your own resolver, on your local machine. It’s the only way.

Only if you have a local network of machines can you consider making one of these machines the resolver for the local network. A typical example of this might be your router. This machine should then not forward the DNS requests to some centralized resolver, it should resolve DNS queries itself.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:22AM (#30658255)
"Run your own resolver, on your local machine. It's the only way."

It is not the only way. I use scan.io as one source of DNS data. No need for resolvers. The needed data can be saved to a zone file for a local authoritative server or a map file for a forward proxy. The later option requires no DNS at all.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Sunday March 13, 2022 @06:48PM (#30666518)
s/scan/&s/
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by cubesnooper on Saturday March 12, 2022 @08:36PM (#30656994)
But that would leak all of my DNS queries in cleartext.

I use cloudflared to do DNS lookups via Cloudflare’s Tor onion. It’s weak to vulnerabilities like this one, but it disassociates my DNS lookups from myself, and TLS certificates mitigate the risk of hitting spoofed sites.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by teddyh on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:29AM (#30660305)
> But that would leak all of my DNS queries in cleartext.

The longer-term solution is to wait for DoT to become prevalent in authorative servers.

But, realistically, won’t you “leak” your IP anyway when you make your actual connection? I mean, why are you looking up things in the DNS if not to connect to them? And if you make a connection, you leak your IP.

If you’re not concerned with the other party’s DNS servers, but with the root servers and TLD DNS servers snooping on your queries, I think you’ll have to wait for QNAME minimization to arrive.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by cubesnooper on Sunday March 13, 2022 @09:34AM (#30661057)
Recursive resolution leaks all my DNS queries in plaintext to my ISP, the nameservers, and everyone in between; on top of that, my ISP can monitor what sites I’m viewing through SNI and server IP. If my DNS queries are encrypted and anonymized, my ISP only gets SNI and server IP. And ECH seems to be moving quickly, so within a couple of years I expect the SNI leak to be plugged.

> The longer-term solution is to wait for DoT to become prevalent in authorative servers.

That has a serious deployment problem, far more so than ECH. It’s going to be years (and years and years) before a person can successfully do recursive resolution via TLS. Is that even on anyone’s roadmap?

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by tentacleuno on Saturday March 12, 2022 @01:50PM (#30653746)
AdGuard[0]. Ad-blocking included :) It's on 94.140.14.14, 94.140.15.15 (know them by heart now) if you want to try it. I've never had a problem with them.

There's also a comprehensive list and comparison of various DNS providers at PrivacyGuides[1].

[0]: https://adguard-dns.com/ [1]: https://privacyguides.org/providers/dns/

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by errantmind on Saturday March 12, 2022 @03:11PM (#30654466)
Two general approaches:

1. A pi-hole on my local network for most devices. I configured my router to forcibly capture all (unencrypted) DNS queries and forward them to my pi-hole, which then forwards them upstream to Cloudflare's DNS (over TLS).

2. I wrote a simple DNS forwarder (over TLS) that uses a 'shotgun' approach to ensure timely query responses, among other performance-sensitive features. I use this on all my Linux machines. It runs as a service and never fails, mean latency is much lower than other forwarders I've tried, including systemd-resolved, unbound, etc.

Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by citizenpaul on Sunday March 13, 2022 @04:06AM (#30659052)
Any chance you woukd be willing to share this shotgun dns program with HN or at least some details.sounds interesting.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by xorcist on Saturday March 12, 2022 @05:42PM (#30655692)

  apt-get install unbound
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by FireInsight on Saturday March 12, 2022 @03:44PM (#30654725)
Used to use Pihole but pi disk corrupted and didn't bother to set up again. Nowadays Quad9 9.9.9.9 and local ad/tracker blocking.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by mdavids on Sunday March 13, 2022 @03:50AM (#30658959)
At home I have my own (Unbound) resolver, when on the road I use NextDNS.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ... by tipoftheiceberg on Sunday March 13, 2022 @12:33PM (#30662850)
NextDNS , highly recommended.