Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by ftobin on Saturday March 12, 2022 @04:57PM
(#30655311)
Cloudflare's malware blocking service is my go-to. 1.1.1.2, supporting DoH and DoT. I prefer them over Quad9 because Google blog post listed several malware domains and Quad9 only caught half, while Cloudflare caught them all.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Quad9/comments/t9b9v1/quad9_not_cat...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by benbristow on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:54PM
(#30656326)
1.1.1.1 is good but it has a bit of an annoying issue where it won't resolve archive.is/archive.today names.
It's been discussed before
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828317
I use that site quite often so it makes it a bit of a no-go.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by seanhunter on Sunday March 13, 2022 @07:15AM
(#30660232)
I am on 1.1.1.1 and it resolves archive.is just fine. I seemingly can't view a number of pages there because of "no cipher overlap" if I turn on https-only but that is not a cloudflare dns problem.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by charcircuit on Saturday March 12, 2022 @11:21PM
(#30657934)
Both archive.is and archive.today resolve for me with 1.1.1.1.
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by dorianmariefr on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:07PM
(#30655904)
I think you meant 1.1.1.1 even though https://1.1.1.2/ redirects to 1.1.1.1
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by iampims on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:14PM
(#30655957)
1.1.1.2 is correct, see this blogpost:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-1-1-1-1-for-families...
Re:A lock with many keys: Spoofing DNSSEC-signed domains in ...
by kingcharles on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:12PM
(#30655941)
No, I just checked, 1.1.1.1 resolves everything.
1.1.1.2 & 1.0.0.2 are their malware-blocking servers.