News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by johnzim on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @01:12PM (#30275985)
It's also quite a helpful metric.

Most British people are aware that the national grid used to spend a lot of time making sure they had the power available to draw during the commercial breaks of mass-media TV events (series finales, half time in a cup match etc) purely for the nation boiling water with electric kettles en masse.

Great intersection of hard science (energy necessary to boil water + extremely efficient energy transfer) and everyperson knowledge. Good journalism!

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by tomp on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @02:31PM (#30277266)
Makes you wonder if the US idea of using just 110 volts isn't better... not from an individual viewpoint (slower to boil water) but from the grid perspective.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by bityard on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @02:36PM (#30277339)
The US grid (the last-mile bits anyway) isn't 110 volts, it's 220. It's just our houses that are wired for (mostly) 110 V.

Edit: I would love to see some sort of hybrid 110/220 V residential wiring/plug standard take hold in the US. It would require more expensive cable in the walls (since you need one additional conductor) and plugs, but it's totally doable. Most electrical products and appliances made these days are easily converted between 110/220, or run just fine on either.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by toast0 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:02PM (#30277663)
There is NEMA 14, which has hot,hot,neutral,ground, but I don't think anything lower than 20amps is available, and that's a locking one, 30 amps is available without locks, but 30 amps at 220v is a lot of power for household outlets. You'd need larger wire in the walls, not just more of them.

Any sort of outlet upgrade would need a really good plan for how to make it viable, because even if 100% of new construction used the new outlet, it would be decades before you could sell devices that relied on it.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by btbuilder on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:46PM (#30278250)
I have a 20A 220 circuit for an electric kettle with multiple 6-15Rs. It has a 20A gfci breaker.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by hedora on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:25PM (#30277987)
You could include a second cable with the teapot, and wire it to work with 110 or 220 depending on which cable is used. This is already reasonably common. I have plenty of useless European cables laying around to prove it.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by AnssiH on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:18PM (#30278609)
> The US grid (the last-mile bits anyway) isn't 110 volts, it's 220. It's just our houses that are wired for (mostly) 110 V.

Similarly, in most of continental Europe phase-to-phase is 400V but most outlets are 230V. E.g. in my apartment only the stove has a 400V three-phase (4-wire) connection.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by xxs on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @06:23PM (#30280215)
but 3phase (120degrees) is a lot better for powering motors than the 2 phase one in the US
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by jessaustin on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @09:06PM (#30281608)
3-phase is available in USA, but it's typically not provided to residences.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by xxs on Thursday February 10, 2022 @01:48AM (#30283119)
of course, the heavy motors/industrial equipment loves 3 phase AC. Higher voltages allow lower losses in the conductors, hence less copper needed everywhere incl. small motors as the current us lower through and through.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by pkulak on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:52PM (#30278323)
I kinda like that all but a couple outlets in my house can't kill me.

Also, I boil my water on an induction stove plugged into 50 amps at 220 volts. I'm not waiting around, to put it mildly.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by jjeaff on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:24PM (#30278705)
110v can easily kill you. It's a little harder to get a good solid connection through your body and into the ground than 220v. But it certainly can and does happen.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by 0n34n7 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:42PM (#30278949)
Amps kill, not volts. Hence high voltage low amp Tesla coil spark shows.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by IntrepidWorm on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:55PM (#30279111)
Thats not quite accurate- it is true that high amp current is deadly in many scenarios, but it takes both amps and volts to kill. High amp, high voltage current is a killer for sure, but high current at sufficiently tiny voltages is not necessarily deadly. Similarly, high voltage at low currents is usually not deadly (but can be very painful).
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by bigDinosaur on Thursday February 10, 2022 @02:04AM (#30283208)
You need to be introduced to a classic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDf2nhfxVzg
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by Dylan16807 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @10:35PM (#30282154)
Your comment is completely irrelevant to wall sockets because they can all supply more than a tenth of an amp.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by CamperBob2 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @05:03PM (#30279188)
High voltage from a Tesla coil not only has low average current, but is subject to the skin effect. So while it can still cause a painful shock to your superficial sensory nerves, not much of that energy ends up in contact with the motor nerves.

TL,DR: you probably don't want to be shocked by a big Tesla coil, even though it won't kill you.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by ErikCorry on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @06:26PM (#30280240)
Never heard of anyone getting killed by the 230V power in Europe. A few people I know touched it and it does hurt.

Perhaps it's because all houses have residual current devices which trigger much faster than fuses if current leaks to earth (eg through a person).

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by baq on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:07PM (#30278486)
30A at 400V is how we roll in the EU.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by orra on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @05:03PM (#30279181)
Wow. A typical induction hob in the UK is 32A at 230V. 230V is of course the nominal voltage of a single phase, although in practice in the UK the voltage is closer to 240V.

That's only 7.35kW of power. Do you have significantly more powerful cookers?

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by kuschku on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @05:36PM (#30279573)
400V is only used for stoves or instant water heaters, but e.g. our stove uses 11kW actually.

If you don’t have these amounts of energy available, the temperature your instant water heater can reach or the speed with which you can cook obviously suffers (which I suspect is one of the reasons why americans prefer gas stoves so much).

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by xxs on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @06:28PM (#30280265)
the 3phase is used for motors - a lot more efficient (and the better power factor) than the single phase ones.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by kuschku on Thursday February 10, 2022 @05:29AM (#30284462)
For industrial applications definitely, but at home there's few people who power motors with triphase or five phase power.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by baq on Thursday February 10, 2022 @06:44AM (#30284893)
these are 3-phase stoves, they require a certified electrician to install, because they don't have plugs and there's no wall socket - just a place into which you can easily connect cables.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by orra on Thursday February 10, 2022 @07:13AM (#30285086)
That makes sense. In the UK you can buy induction hobs that plug into sockets, but they are limited to a measly 3.7kW or there abouts. A nicer 32A induction hob needs hardwired (single phase).

You can have upgrade your domestic supply to three phrase, but AFAICT it's uncommon. Perhaps with electric cars and induction hobs replacing natural gas and petrol, it will become more common.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by hedora on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:23PM (#30277954)
You could just run US-style appliance circuits to your kitchen, etc. Those are sometimes three conductor and other times four conductor.

However, I doubt it'd pass inspection if they were easily accessible from the counter-top.

If you're going to flout building codes anyway, it'd probably be easier/more practical to just run circuits with foreign outlets instead. Also, it might be easier to find appropriate GFCI breakers.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by btbuilder on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:43PM (#30278218)
Use 6-15R or 6-20R. I think it would pass inspection because most safety requirements around gfci and afci don’t apply to 240V circuits
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by coryrc on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @03:58PM (#30278386)
They do now, but only when accessible by a person. Even car charging station outlets do (even though every car charging station has gfci built in...)
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by btbuilder on Thursday February 10, 2022 @12:59AM (#30282910)
Ah looks like this was a change in 2017. With any outlet there’s no guarantee what will end up plugged in so it’s logical to require it even if the purpose is an EV charger.

Thanks!

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by thedougd on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @06:00PM (#30279932)
EU is on 50hz AC, where as the US is on 60hz. It would work fine for purely resistive appliances, and possibly devices with switching mode power supplies, but some devices would be unhappy plugging in to the wrong frequency at 220V.

I'm not sure about the phase alignment but that may be an issue as well. US is split phase, but Europe has 220 on a single conductor?

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by xxs on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @06:26PM (#30280248)
it's 230 (+-10%) nominal not 220. At my house it's around 235. It's 230v phase/live to neutral and 400V between live wires in 3phase. Nowadays 3-phase (120degree between each) is a commodity.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by jessaustin on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @09:11PM (#30281647)
In my part of USA the typical voltage between the two sides of a breaker box is 240V. It actually moves around a bit below that value, but doesn't seem to ever exceed 240V. I think most consumer devices have the circuitry necessary to survive such variation, but I have seen some (expensive) professional equipment fried in an instant...
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by thedougd on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @09:33PM (#30281776)
Thanks for that. Sounds wonderful compared to the typical 200 amp, split phase service we commonly have in the US.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by Dylan16807 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @10:36PM (#30282161)
How many non-switching power supplies will care either?
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by simfree on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @02:35PM (#30277322)
110v does nearly halve your peak power draw... But the transformers have a bit of added complexity and in homes and businesses you need thicker wire to move the same amount of power.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by CamperBob2 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @05:01PM (#30279173)
Power is power. To the extent 110V is slower to boil water, it's a reflection of either inadequate power delivery capacity due to the higher currents required, or wasted heat in places other than the kettle. Either way, heat gets lost over time.

You're almost always better off with higher voltage and less current, when given a choice. An obvious exception being when you get shocked. :-P Or when corona losses come into the picture.

Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by tigershark on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:34PM (#30278844)
No, it’s absolutely not. They consume a lot of power on average as far as I remember. They have just more transmissions loss at a lower voltage and I guess that it would be a pain to use a normal induction cooktop with 9-10KW at 110V.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by nr2x on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @04:22PM (#30278666)
Yes, and some places world cup viewership can take down the grid!
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by chemengds on Thursday February 10, 2022 @06:00AM (#30284635)
Whilst kettles are used as the unit of measurement the main driver of power consumption spikes during those breaks was electric pump for toilet cisterns.
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by seanw444 on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @01:32PM (#30276368)
Wasn't there a relevant Tom Scott video on the subject?
Re:Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy by moreati on Wednesday February 09, 2022 @01:54PM (#30276740)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jx_bJgIFhI about pumped hydro at Dinorwig Power Station