News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mgraczyk on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:16PM (#29997652)
I'm a Google employee who just found out about this. I'm not annoyed that I have to pay, it's been ~13 years of free service and I don't think Google is obligated to continue providing this to me.

The annoying part is that Google doesn't provide any migration tool, but there are migration tools for Google Edu accounts so that graduating students can migrate their data to personal Google accounts. The software is evidently mostly written and tested, but for whatever reason it hasn't been brought over the finish line for other workspace users.

Obviously our use case isn't that common (it's been "legacy" for years) but still annoying to know that there's probably some script I could run to do this, but nobody has built the web UI for it.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by treesknees on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:28PM (#29997842)
The problem is, I'm not a freeloader despite having my free account for almost 13 years.

I was a proud owner of Nexus phones, Google Fi subscriber, Google Music (YouTube Premium) subscriber, I've purchased apps and tv content on Google Play, and I also started paying for Google Drive storage after they removed the free unlimited photo backups. I had YouTube TV for a time. Having a powerful Gsuite service was a driving factor into the Google ecosystem for me.

I've been slowly pulling out of Google's services as they've been shutdown, renamed, etc. This will be the ultimate drive off of their services for me. By wanting an extra $6/month/user, they are now losing out on a lot more. I'm sure that my situation isn't unique.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by quesomaster9000 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:13PM (#29998541)
The long-tail isn't being considered here IMO.

Dyn.com (nee DynDNS, in the dialup days) was bought out by Oracle, my nearly 20 year old lifetime VIP account will be terminated in May despite using a few thousand requests per month and in the past highly recommending their extortionately priced but rather excellent global load balancer and enterprise anycast services (to the tune of thousands of dollars per month).

Likewise with Google, I had an original G1 phone and several iterations of the Pixel, have migrated several companies over to their excellent their cloud offerings, again to the tune of tens of thousands per month.

It just feels like I'm getting the shitty end of the stick here. In both cases I could've done it cheaper myself with other providers, and had to strongly argue that the alternative (Dyn, Google Cloud, AWS etc.) is a pragmatic and possibly the best albeit expensive choice in the long-run.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mianos on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:04PM (#30002332)
Identical situations, VIP dyndns, all Nexus phones, 3 Pixels and google apps. On the plus side, I can't think of any other free service I use. (Damn, just remembered I use the hobbyist license for fusion360, they are slowly crippling that but not a big bang).

What are you going to do for DNS? I just got static DNS for home so I guess I could host my own DNS but the custom gapps domain mail will be a hassle. Maybe just forward it to my other @gmail account?

Luckily I never trusted this to stay free (for all 10 years I think), so I never used the calendar or drive, just the email.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by quesomaster9000 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:58PM (#30002816)
So I own the domains, I can register them for 10 years at a time with ICANN, with that I can switch providers at will. Most of the reputable domain registrars have been around for the past 20 years and offer free basic DNS hosting... All I need is a MX record.

Next step is buying IP space, that's a lot more expensive with the yearly AS fees, I'm not sure I can afford that, and ARIN/RIPE seem just as bad as the [PS]aaS cartel where if you don't pay up your IP space gets re-sold.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by collin128 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:46AM (#30005209)
Posted this on a few comments because I find them really helpful: https://improvmx.com/
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:11AM (#30009837)
Thanks for the link @collin128! I'm the founder of ImprovMX, happy to answer any questions!
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by rodolphoarruda on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @04:11PM (#30078094)
Hi "cx". If you skim this page you'll notice the predominant personas and their own-domain email use-cases. Something like: 1 domain, 10 aliases, ability to send/receive messages. So, why don't you create a "Google Workspace Rescue" plan at $1/$2 per month? I'm a potential customer myself, and it seems to me that the free plan lacks functionality and the Premium is too resourceful (at a $9 tag). Just adding my 2 cents.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Friday January 28, 2022 @08:41AM (#30114423)
Thank you for the suggestion. We had had this requests since the beginning, but the issue is that at $1/$2 per month, one chargeback cost us 7 to 15 customers at these plans to support just the implicated costs. That's why we never got lower than 9$.

Granted, we don't have chargebacks everyday, but we get some occasionals one that, at these price, would hurt way more.

Now, we still offer an alternative plan that is available only upon request (or on certain occasions). We call it the "Lite plan" at 30$ per year, where you have all the advantages of the premium plan, but without the SMTP sending part. If that interests you, just send a request to the support and we'll enable it for your account :=)

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by navmed on Saturday February 05, 2022 @02:12PM (#30224694)
Maybe you can charge annually for this, so it's more than $9. I don't mind if PayPal costs as much for chargebacks.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by collin128 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:50AM (#30010368)
Big fans of yours. Thanks for making an awesome tool.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:14PM (#30011700)
Thank you! I really appreciate it! :)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mianos on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @11:48PM (#30004799)
Just to answer one of my own questions. I am tossing up between ProtonMail and Runbox. Both have custom domains for the first paid level tier and I'll get better security to boot. Both take BTC so it comes from my trading account and not the family funds. :) DNS I'll probably look at when Larry from Oracle kicks the last of the VIPS off dyndns. Looking at hosting on a container in my DMZ. Something I have not done for 20 years. djdns anyone?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by kcartlidge on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:54AM (#30006845)
I used Runbox for very many years and loved it. I cannot even remember why I migrated off; I was probably naively seduced by the launch of GMail (it was a long while ago) and getting similar stuff for free (I was an idiot).

Every couple of years I get a new trial account with them as I liked it so much, and each time I think 'nothing has really changed'. I read their dev blog and it's interesting, and their staff were great each time, but it just seems to take forever for anything to get done.

It may have been finished now, but the last time I tried them (only maybe a year or two ago) I was put off by wanting to move my calendar entries over and finding out that the new(ish) CalDav support they'd added had no web interface to it.

I get that the basics don't really change (and they are good at it); I just get irritated at the lack of pace. Otherwise I'd definitely consider returning to them.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by spear on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @08:57PM (#30003316)
I switched from Dyn to Namecheap (who is the registrar for my family domain) for their free DNS service. No issues but we really only use it for e-mail.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mianos on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @11:51PM (#30004819)
I have some domains with Namecheap but I didn't know they would host DNS for me. Thanks I'll look into this.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by collin128 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:45AM (#30005200)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mianos on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:28AM (#30005843)
Thanks. The free tier looks good. The only issue I have is I use a different alias for every account so I think I'd run out with only 25.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by tijtij on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:51AM (#30007240)
By default it sets up a wild card local-part so any and all email sent to your domain will be forwarded. So you don't have to predefine aliases for every online account/service that use.

What the 25 aliases allotted in the free tier allows you to do is have 25 different domains.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:13AM (#30009849)
Hi! I'm ImprovMX's founder. You are correct that you'd reach the limit of 5 free alias in your case. Upgrading to the monthly plan at 9$ would allow you to have up to 100 aliases.

Happy to answer any questions that you might need!

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by physhster on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:03PM (#30015787)
TLS please?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Friday January 21, 2022 @02:07AM (#30020172)
What about TLS? We support it on both standard SMTP connections and for sending emails.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by physhster on Friday January 21, 2022 @12:15PM (#30026539)
https://imgur.com/a/8CtFSgv doesn't look like it :)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Monday January 24, 2022 @03:59PM (#30063951)
That got me thinking. I tested again on CheckTLS.com and if you use the port 465 and direct TLS, everything is fine. If you use port 587 and use STARTTLS, it's all good too.

Our decision was to not use STARTTLS for port 25, but that's maybe not a good idea and we should allow it back: this would make both services happier ;)

In a nutshell: TLS via 465 works correctly, and STARTTLS via 587 too.

Don't hesitate if you want to weight on this, happy to discuss this further!

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by physhster on Tuesday January 25, 2022 @03:29PM (#30077598)
Thanks for deciding to support STARTTLS on port 25 as well, and for updating your certificates!
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by cx42net on Friday January 28, 2022 @08:38AM (#30114400)
You are welcome. Seeing that MXToolbox was testing STARTTLS on port 25, and a few other indicators made us decide to enable it :)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by physhster on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:03PM (#30015781)
Good but no TLS. I don't know how I feel about this...
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by agentx3r on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:26PM (#30013500)
I've been using AWS Route53 DNS for my domain for many years, very cheap and easy to automate a DDNS setup if desired (e.g. https://crazymax.dev/ddns-route53/)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by milleramp on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @09:02PM (#30003388)
I have been using NoIP for my simple home setup. It’s free but requires a monthly acknowledgment, but it’s relatively quick and easy.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by t0mas88 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:17PM (#29998590)
Ah yes, we used Dyn global load balancer 10 years ago. It was a great solution at the time. But they kept their high prices while AWS started offering more flexible solutions at 1/100th of the Dyn price.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by chimprich on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:09PM (#29998483)
> I'm a Google employee who just found out about this. I'm not annoyed that I have to pay, it's been ~13 years of free service and I don't think Google is obligated to continue providing this to me.

Well I'm very annoyed. It's not that I might have to pay for a service, it's the unfairness of it. I've several friends and family members up with accounts on my domain to be nice to them to make life easier for them or because they were too poor/techy to set up something for themselves.

I also have a few hacky things set up using free email accounts on my domain, because why not.

Now Google want to charge me cash for their accounts after I've done some free marketing for them in getting people using the Google ecosystem. They don't seem to be providing me with any help to get them transferred to a free account. It will cost me either a lot of money or time and/or social capital to solve this.

This is an enormous price jump from free. The free Google Apps or whatever it is had up to 100 users. If I had 100 users, that looks like £50 per user per year on their cheapest tier, so £500 [edit: £5,000!! - thanks, @alias_neo] a year.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by ryandvm on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:45PM (#29998967)
Agreed. I'm fucking livid.

I don't know what their freeloader costs are on the grandfathered Google domain accounts, but I'm having a hard time believing it's going to be worth the amount of goodwill they're going to burn by shitting on their most loyal users of all. These folks have been using Google services (and presumably suggesting as much to others) for at least 10 years.

But I'm not paying $100/mo so my extended family can continue to have a vanity Google account.

Google ought to think long and hard about this one. The email I draft to everyone to tell them that they're losing access to all their email, docs, pictures, apps, music, etc. is going to be harsh as hell on Google. And I'm sure that I'm not the only one that's going to have to author one of those...

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by weeblewobble on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @03:30PM (#29999570)
I've been reading people on HN talk about how Google is burning their goodwill and there will be Very Serious Consequences for a literal decade. Over that time Google stock price has gone up 10x.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by tyingq on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:27PM (#30001273)
>Over that time Google stock price has gone up 10x.

Based mostly on taking display ads from "only in the sidebar" to "everywhere, including every pixel above the fold if the search term is lucrative". There's not a lot of juice left there to continue revenue increases that exceed general internet eyeball growth. They will still make an insane amount of money, but I don't see how they can sustain past growth YoY percentages.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by encryptluks2 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:09PM (#30002371)
No, GCP and Google Workspace are great compared to most options out there. Microsoft Family is a good price and I use it as a backup, but the 1TB of storage is per account and I honestly hate Microsoft at this point way more than Google, have fun with Outlook and everything else.

The thing that was the most annoying was the shift from G Suite to Workplace. Before, I was getting unlimited Google Drive storage for $12 a month, and now it is like $20 or something... still, for $20 a month you get basically unlimited cloud storage. No other provider can compete.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Retric on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @08:43PM (#30003196)
20$/month is quite expensive compared to many cloud offerings. It’s only a bargain if you actually store a lot of data which is so rare they can offer it at 20$/ month with the expectation that most of their customers are getting screwed.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by encryptluks2 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:49AM (#30005223)
$20/mo. is for their enterprise std version. They have plans starting at $6/mo. and $12/mo. provides 2TB of storage per user which is plenty for most users and a much better deal than O365 IMO.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by acdha on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @10:58PM (#30004391)
> GCP and Google Workspace are great compared to most options out there.

GCP is number 3 and struggling, with few wins big enough to compensate for the gaps. Workspaces isn’t bad but it’s not compellingly better than O365. Both are held back by management and sales teams who appear to think it’s 2008 and everyone will do the job of selling for them.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by HillRat on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @11:59PM (#30004865)
As I see it, GCP has successfully become a peer competitor to AWS and Azure (which I was, to be honest, uncertain they could pull off), while, conversely, Workspace is a truly painful experience compared to almost every alternative -- and I'm including Sharepoint in that. It's horribly disjointed, and they've changed chat and conferencing solutions so many times that it's virtually impossible to figure out how to make their own hardware work with their own services. O365 has its issues, but it hangs together as a single product far more successfully than the farrago Google is pushing.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by encryptluks2 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:18AM (#30005003)
Until you need to manage it, and then Workspace is far ahead of Microsoft. Hence, why at least Workspace has proper DevOps integrations for things like Terraform. Google's MDM is pretty good too, while maybe not as diverse as Microsoft, far cheaper and Microsoft MDM is a nightmare.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by WorldMaker on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @04:30PM (#30000433)
Google's stock price is so driven by its advertising business that it is absolutely disconnected from Google burning its goodwill in "prosumer" services like this and some of the others cycled through on HN. Given how large Google's advertising division's reach is outside of Google products, its probable that even a large boycott of Google's first party consumer services wouldn't easily affect the advertising business bottom line. At least for now. At some point they could burn enough goodwill that even advertisers and sites that need advertising won't work with them. (Given what we know from DoubleClick's legacy even before they merged into Google though, the internet in general doesn't seem to mind evil companies running their ads so long as they get paid their share of ad revenue.)
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by weeblewobble on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:24PM (#30014279)
Maybe, but you'd think if you spent 10 years steadily burning goodwill you'd eventually run out of it
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by chimprich on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @03:05PM (#29999223)
It's basically the drug dealer business model: get people hooked for free, then start charging them a huge amount when it's too difficult for them to stop.

At least your local heroin vendor doesn't pretend it's /always/ going to be free, though...

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by zevlag on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:18PM (#30015187)
I'm working on drafting such a letter now.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by alias_neo on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:20PM (#29998635)
I think you mean £5000 per year.

I have a dozen or so family members on mine, that's ~£600.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by ymolodtsov on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:13AM (#30005750)
This has been a legacy feature for quite some time. Honestly, if it was just about email I think there would be nothing wrong with it. The main problem is that it's THE Google account for some people, which includes all their purchases and data and there's no way to move it.

Using G-Suite as your personal email has always been hell anyway.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Masema on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:59AM (#30008952)
> it's THE Google account for some people, which includes all their purchases and data and there's no way to move it.

In these comments (on HN), I've seen claims that we'll still be able to login to Google with our old accounts, like how it's possible to have a Google account with an @yahoo login.

I've also seen people disputing that, though.

> Using G-Suite as your personal email has always been hell anyway.

I've not had "hell"-level problems. It's all been working pretty well for me.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by zevlag on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:25PM (#30015277)
It started out really simple, and good. Then as google added other features, new products, acquired companies, it's gotten harder and harder.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by acegopher on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:28PM (#29997851)
I was an early "GMail for domains" user, and have felt abandoned as there are services in Google Home I can't use as a "Workspace" account.

I would gladly transition to a @gmail.com account and just do an email forward, which is why I had originally signed up, IF ONLY GOOGLE WOULD HAVE A MIGRATION TOOL. They pushed my family into Workspace as they abandoned us, and give us NO OPTION to transfer 13+ years of history.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by agentx3r on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @03:17PM (#29999385)
Yes, making me migrate manually means I'm very likely to migrate to Outlook365
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Aloha on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @11:30PM (#30004663)
Look, I'd gladly pay something but 60 dollars per month, every month? I'd be happy to pay 120 dollars a year for the service I'm getting now. Like one of the parallel commenters, I have given out accounts on my domain.

I dont really need any more service than I have now, I don't need the full google workspace, I just want gmail on my custom domain, thats all really.

The most annoying parts of this, google, the company that hosts my email, couldn't even be bothered to send me an email about this, I instead found out about it on the front page of HN.

So now I need to figure out how to migrate out, because if I move my email, I have to move my entire google account, my email, domain hosting/registration, youtube account, everything, I have no way to port the data over even to a regular account.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by adamrmcd on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:12AM (#30004946)
Exactly the same boat here. No email notifying me of the change either.

Plus, what about all the third party web sites that offer nice buttons that say "Sign in with Google"?

If you used your legacy Gapps domain to authenticate, do you think they all provide easy implementations to migrate your Google-one-click-authentication account to a same-email-new-local-password account? Hell no.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by rekoil on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:15AM (#30006190)
I haven't looked at it but I would hope that "Sign in with Google" provides the service using it with a stable ID other than the email address. But I can also see services ignoring that and just using the email address anyway...

If such a service only saved the email address when the user account was created it might be very difficult for them to fix this unless the do it really quickly and I happen to sign in to their service before all of this goes down.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by rekoil on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:09AM (#30006147)
> I don't need the full google workspace

It's honestly just a chore, many things don't work using G-Suite accounts, like taking part of a Google Home family with Gmail users, or signing in to Android Automotive (yes, I had to make a new account to be able to sign in to my Polestar 2 because my account is a G-Suite account), I would be HAPPY if they "downgraded" me to Gmail with custom domains and charged me a few bucks a month for it.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Aloha on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:00AM (#30006512)
Agreed.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by MoreCookies on Tuesday February 01, 2022 @05:48PM (#30170704)
This is exactly how I feel. I'm not against paying for hosted email, but that's not what they're trying to charge us for. They're trying to charge for hosted email + a million other 'Workspace' features we don't want or need.

If Google introduced a "Legacy GSuite Mail' plan at say $20/yr to retain all existing mail functionality and accounts, and disabled every other Workspace feature, I'd gladly pay for that.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by coffeefirst on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:56PM (#30002263)
Right. I think what's lost in translation is because it was free, a lot of early adopters used it in ways that are impractical to transition to paid—extended families, hobby projects, etc, and have been using them for a very long time.

I could almost be sympathetic to them not wanting to build a migration tool.

But the least they could have done is set up a way to permanently forward to another gmail account so at least old email addresses do not break. They did not do that.

Ooh, and one more super fun fact: there is no way to transfer ownership of a Google Drive folder to an account outside of your domain. Which is awesome when you're the owner of a large shared folder that needs to persist.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by rekoil on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:20AM (#30006235)
They are creating a LOT of issues for people if they don't provide a tool to migrate the account to a non G-suite account. I'll be moving email elsewhere, but losing that account and all the services it's connected to will result in a lot of annoyances for me over the years as I discover to what services I've authenticated in this manner.

Not to mention Android devices and software purchases tied to the account, what happens to those unless Google provides a migration tool?

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by coffeefirst on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:10AM (#30009816)
Oh man, I didn't even think about Single Sign On. Changing your email on every service you've ever interacted with is a huge project, but if you used SSO, a lot of those can't be changed to conventional emails, and even if you can pick up your domain and hop to Fastmail or something those are going to break.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Navarr on Thursday January 20, 2022 @01:16PM (#30012500)
I was already livid about this change but this is the piece de resistance. Holy hell. Even after migrating to a regular Google account I've still been using my custom domain as my identity.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by chaz6 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:50PM (#29998229)
I honestly would not mind a one-off fee to convert my accounts so that I can carry on using my accounts just like any other free @gmail.com user. I never used any of the extra functionality. I only wanted to use my own domain with Google.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by sigzero on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:31PM (#30015363)
Yeah, unfortunately going to @gmail may mean the account name isn't available because it's already in use. Almost all of my family members fall into that category.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by samueldr on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:12PM (#29998532)
Any idea if they'll make a "gmail.com" account migration utility down the line? This is extremely concerning for Play store purchases, and anything non-email attached to the "google apps for your domain" account, like YouTube.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by angus-prune on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:34PM (#30001370)
I dug into this with support and the docs.

When you cancel workspace, the accounts remain active but lose access to just the workspace features (gmail, drive, docs, calendar etc). The accounts will remain the same for things like google play, youtube etc and you won't lose access to any purchases.

The biggest impact I can see, other than the headache of migration, is that former GFYD email address can NEVER be used for docs, drive etc, even on the same terms as a free personal account.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by samueldr on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:41PM (#30001474)
I will wait for an official answer from a Google rep. There is too much at stake to guesstimate on vague phrasing.

And still, losing google docs document sharing, and calendar, on the e-mail address identifier which will stay my valid and primary one is a hostile move, plain and simple.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by angus-prune on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:54PM (#30001618)
I agree with you on losing access to sharing to your primary email address.

The situation has been officially confirmed on their support pages [https://support.google.com/a/answer/1257646]:

" Impact to services after you cancel Google Workspace You lose access to core Google Workspace services, such as Gmail, Calendar, Meet, and more. You still have access to Additional Google services, such as YouTube, Google Photos, and Google Ads. "

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by deadgiveaway on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:47PM (#30002156)
That's info related to cancelling from "Google Workspace". I'm on "G Suite legacy" so i'm not sure that applies to me. Maybe I have to upgrade, but not pay, then cancel. It's a bit of a gamble. What if I do that - or do nothing except wait - and find my account is eventually suspended? I have a bunch of accounts I use for photo backups, plus maybe 5 humans using accounts for Android login, and email. Suppose I own mydomain.com. Can everyone continue to log into android using [email protected], [email protected]? Gmail stops working - what does that mean? Assuming the users can continue to use their accounts for Android (youtube, photos, apps etc) can't they configure gmail to send/receive email via some other service?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by angus-prune on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:52PM (#30002210)
Yes, you would upgrade and then immediately cancel. I've had this confirmed by google workspace support.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by deadgiveaway on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:03PM (#30002329)
Thanks. This is Google, where nothing's ever finished, so when I logged in and tried to find out the answer to questions like this I saw:

"Support availability is rolling out to our G Suite legacy free edition customers over the coming days. If you do not currently have access to Support, please check back in a few days. We apologize for any inconvenience, but look forward to connecting with you shortly."

I look forward to some support for the service I've used for 15 years and what to tell the 5 family members who use "G Suite" (aka Google Apps) to handle email from my domain.

Do you know if there's a list of which services will/won't be avaiable after this process? Seems a bit random. Google ads but not gmail..but you can use gmail to point at another email service presumably? Can I still use the google apps I paid for? Does my [email protected] sort of work like it would if I'd use a hotmain account as my android account? But...if I did that, wouldn't I have access to gmail still? I sort of assumed you would but perhaps not.

One thing about G Suite accounts is Google never got around to making them act just like normal accounts; I cannot review android apps with my account, nor can I share paid-for apps with family members. Will this functionality magically appear after I cancel?

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by deadgiveaway on Thursday January 20, 2022 @04:13PM (#30015109)
They're telling some people the exact opposite - that they'll lose all their photos. Google need to forget all this "core", "additional" crap and just list what people will and won't lose access to once they cancel Workspace.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by karlshea on Thursday January 20, 2022 @01:18AM (#30005446)
But then what happens when that new account wants to use Google Docs? From what I've been reading it sounds like they would be blocked from doing that forever.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by angus-prune on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:00AM (#30007308)
Yes, I had this confirmed by support. This is the most frustrating (and ridiculous) aspect. People will no longer be able to share things with your main email address.

You can sign up for a google account with any email address, so if you'd never used GFYD you'd be able to do this no problem.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by karlshea on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @02:32PM (#30090520)
So this doesn't actually appear to be the case.

Over the last week I've gone through all of the steps of registering a new domain, setting it up with Google Workspace, sharing some docs back and forth, deleting the entire organization, and then signing up for a new google account using the same email address (so no gmail). After each step I waited 24 hours.

I was able to access Docs and share back and forth using this reused address on the new account. You'll obviously lose all of the existing share connections, but it's not like the address itself is burned.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by karlshea on Thursday January 20, 2022 @11:24AM (#30010975)
Absolute insanity.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by jrochkind1 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @10:59PM (#30004403)
That same page also says:

> (Optional) Step 3: Delete your organization’s Google Account

> If you no longer want a Google Account for your organization, delete the entire account. Deleting your organization’s account frees your domain within 24 hours for use with a new Google Account.

Not totally sure the implications of that, it kind of sounds like you can create a clean slate where you can re-use that email address as normal? But not sure, it's confusing and I wouldn't count on it.

Which I'm not surprised about not being sure what will happen -- honestly for the last ten years, the implications and consequences of this legacy free "g suite"/"g aps"/whatever it is account have been continually super confusing and un-documented, and often seemed accidental on google's end.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by jrochkind1 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @10:44PM (#30004287)
> The biggest impact I can see, other than the headache of migration, is that former GFYD email address can NEVER be used for docs, drive etc, even on the same terms as a free personal account.

Uh oh. So, let's say I take my custom domain email address and set it up on a non-Google provider. (The whole reason I have a custom domain is to avoid locking me to a vendor).

I can't then set up an ordinary personal google account using this email, it'll be reserved forever?

That stinks.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by toast0 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:08PM (#30002362)
> The biggest impact I can see, other than the headache of migration, is that former GFYD email address can NEVER be used for docs, drive etc, even on the same terms as a free personal account.

If the legacy product is the same as the paid product, you may want to rename your accounts/switch domains before you close the workspace. Then there wouldn't be a naming conflict.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Macha on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:50PM (#30002742)
Switching domains is one of those features that was not available on the free account.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by pxx on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:33PM (#30001355)
Afaict your account will still exist, just not be linked to mail (which I get), but also not linked to calendar (which I don't get). See the email: "You may still retain access to additional Google services, such as YouTube and Google Photos."
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by samueldr on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:41PM (#30001469)
I will wait for an official answer from a Google rep. There is too much at stake to guesstimate on vague phrasing.

And still, losing google docs document sharing, and calendar, on the e-mail address identifier which will stay my valid and primary one is a hostile move, plain and simple.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by deadgiveaway on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:49PM (#30002178)
My email didn't say "You may". May's a stupid word. Do they mean "You are permitted" or "hey, you may have access, you may not - depends how we feel".
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by signal11 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:34PM (#29997941)
Is there an equivalent of Microsoft’s Home Use Program (HUP) for Google Workspace?

HUP gets you Microsoft 365 (Office apps, OneDrive, ad-free email with a 50GB quota and one custom domain) for your family, with 30% off list price for people using Microsoft solutions at work — which is most office workers, assuming their employers have opted in.

It’d be nice to see something similar from Google.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by tyingq on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:02PM (#29998376)
The 365 Family plan is $99/year, total (not per person), for up to 6 people, and you can use your own domain.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by 422long on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:13PM (#29998538)
Funny.. I was apparently already paying for this and never knew it came with email. Too bad there is a 6 person hard limit as I need 7 accounts.

Just tested a bit and it looks like only domains with DNS hosted by Godaddy work with this.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by tyingq on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @04:16PM (#30000256)
That's supposedly just a marketing thing. It doesn't have to be Godaddy.

The process is a little convoluted: https://www.reddit.com/r/Office365/comments/ft15pk/use_perso...

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by MikusR on Thursday January 20, 2022 @07:36AM (#30008101)
And each of those 6 come with 1TB of onedrive and 6 devices of Office apps
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mjg59 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @08:31PM (#30003099)
Google employees are entitled to a discounted tier ($0.75 per user per year, I think), and that will continue even if you leave the company.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by neop1x on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:27AM (#30007064)
"that will continue even if you leave the company" - yeah, just like the free email on custom domains forever...
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mjg59 on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:38AM (#30007611)
It's not guaranteed, but it's going to last longer than the current free tier, so?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mgraczyk on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @09:07PM (#30003441)
oh lol should have checked first, thanks!
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by webmaven on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:50PM (#29999048)
> Obviously our use case isn't that common (it's been "legacy" for years) but still annoying to know that there's probably some script I could run to do this, but nobody has built the web UI for it.

Sounds like a perfect opportunity for a 20% time project. Surely you aren't the only Googler in this situation?

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by y4mi on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @02:58PM (#29999150)
Its not just googlers, the legacy accounts where available to everyone at the start.

but the venn diagram overlap of people

    * willing to pay for such a tool, 
    * not having switched to another provider since
    * and not willing to start paying for it now
will be tiny
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by michaelmrose on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:22PM (#30001199)
It was free for 10 accounts. The number one massively applicable use case vs plain google accounts was vanity domain names and signing up was no harder than creating a regular gmail account. There are probably more vanity domain users than small businesses with 10 people. In fact I would venture to guess with the 10 address limit they are nearly 100% of the remaining users on the legacy program.

The cost of the domain name is $10 per domain per year or $1 per person per year little enough for one person to pay without thinking.

Most people keep an email address for a very very long time rarely switching unless a service ceases to exist.

Almost no domain owners are going to pony up $720 per year themselves and collection from other users will be an untenable hassle.

Basically every bullet point you listed is wrong. The remaining pool of users is likely 99% vanity users who would have used Gmail+custom domain forever at no real cost to Google over free Gmail none of which will migrate to Google workspace.

For Google the gain from this change will be identical to picking n random Gmail accounts and canceling them and keeping those users digital purchases as a giant fu.

Not ruinous but hardly profitable either.

Someone with an ounce of sense would have included the option to migrate all email accounts to regular Gmail accounts.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by ArchOversight on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:43PM (#30001497)
It was free for unlimited accounts (I still have a G Suite Legacy account that was grandfathered into that) at first.

Eventually unlimited free accounts was dropped to 50, in 2009 (my grandfathered account was soft-capped at that, with the option to reach out to support to increase it), but I had several other domains that were hard-capped at 50 since I opened them after that limit was instituted. [1]

Then that limit was dropped from 50 to 10 (hard capped, grand-fathered accounts kept their old limits) in 2011. [2]

Then last but not least there was the 1 user free if you had a Google AppEngine project (that came with the requirement that it was tied to a G-Suite at the time).

My G Suite legacy accounts were all created in 2007-2010 timeframe.

[1]: https://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2009/01/50-user-limi...

[2]: https://cloud.googleblog.com/2011/04/helping-small-businesse...

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Aloha on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @11:36PM (#30004704)
Have you even gotten an email from them yet on your oldest accounts?

Mine is from '08 and I have heard no official communications from them.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by InvaderFizz on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:14AM (#30005755)
No email here. Mine is from the very early days, pretty much as soon as it became available as Google Apps for Domains. I have a 200 user cap because I requested more than whatever the default was. I have a total of 3 active accounts, everything else is just a forwarder.

I use it as a forwarder to my gmail, but now I have to migrate my parents off their accounts. It will either end up as Gmail or Outlook.com for them. Migrating their email will be annoying.

I maintain a full GSuite Business account for other purposes, so I can use that as my mail relay service.

Thanks to routing rules, they'll continue to receive emails transparently, it will redirect a copy to their new email, as if they were a BCC.

I'll handle the groups the same, only a few and the routing rule can add 100 recipients.

Eventually, once cloudflare email forwarding supports groups, I'll just move to that. It's on their internal roadmap, so maybe it will happen before 2024.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Aloha on Saturday January 22, 2022 @11:41AM (#30038188)
I think I may have figured out why the very oldest accounts have not received notifications about this change.

I dont think they can/will do it for anyone prior to December of 2011.

http://googlepress.blogspot.com/2006/08/google-launches-host...

"A standard edition of Google Apps for Your Domain is available today as a beta product without cost to domain administrators or end users. Key features include 2 gigabytes of email storage for each user, easy to use customization tools, and help for administrators via email or an online help center. Furthermore, organizations that sign up during the beta period will not ever have to pay for users accepted during that period (provided Google continues to offer the service)."

The original version of the TOS from August 2006 read as follows:

https://web.archive.org/web/20061029132431/https://www.googl...

"16. Modification. Except as provided in Section 17, Google reserves the right to change or modify any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement or any policy governing Google Apps, at any time, by posting the new agreement at http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/terms.html or such URL as Google may provide. Customer is responsible for regularly reviewing any updates to this Agreement. Any changes or modifications to this Agreement will become binding (i) when made in a writing executed by both parties, (ii) by Customer's online acceptance of updated terms, or (iii) after Customer's continued use of Google Apps after such terms have been updated by Google."

"17. No Fees. Provided that Google continues to offer Google Apps for Your Domain to Customer, Google will continue to provide a version of Google Apps for Your Domain (with substantially the same services as those provided as of the Effective Date) free of charge to Customer; provided that such commitment (i) applies only to End User Accounts created during the period when the Google Hosted Services are considered a beta service (the "Beta Period") by Google (such Beta Period determination at Google's sole discretion) and (ii) may not apply to new opt-in services added by Google to the Google Apps for Your Domain in the future. For sake of clarity, Google reserves the right to offer a premium version of Google Apps for Your Domain for a fee."

In mid 2007 the language was changed to read the following:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070407174217/http://www.google...

"17. Modification. Except as provided in Section 18, Google reserves the right to change or modify any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement or any policy governing the Service, at any time, by posting the new agreement at http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/terms.html or such URL as Google may provide. Customer is responsible for regularly reviewing any updates to this Agreement. Any changes or modifications to this Agreement will become binding (i) when made in a writing executed by both parties, (ii) by Customer's online acceptance of updated terms, or (iii) after Customer's continued use of the Service after such terms have been updated by Google."

"18. Fees. Provided that Google continues to offer the Service to Customer, Google will continue to provide a version of the Service (with substantially the same services as those provided as of the Effective Date) free of charge to Customer; provided that such commitment: (i) does not apply to the Domain Service described in Section 4 above; and (ii) may not apply to new opt-in services added by Google to the Service in the future. For sake of clarity, Google reserves the right to offer a premium version of the Service for a fee."

This version was persisting thru at least March of 2011:

https://web.archive.org/web/20110330181415/http://www.google...

However by December of 2011, that language was gone:

https://web.archive.org/web/20111231230542/http://www.google...

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by bhank on Saturday January 29, 2022 @05:55PM (#30131447)
I have received The Email for domains set up with Google Apps on 2007-09-08 and 2007-10-08 (got the emails on Jan. 20 and 27 respectively), but not for domains set up on 2007-07-03 or 2012-01-24. I think they're still getting around to it.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by InvaderFizz on Sunday January 23, 2022 @10:19AM (#30046737)
I hope this is the case. Either way, I'm not taking action unless I'm forced to.

Worst case, I may end up paying for a month or two while I make the transition.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by matheweis on Sunday January 23, 2022 @01:07AM (#30044002)
I sort of doubt it... I didn't receive any notification, and I'd been active since 2013.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by ArchOversight on Friday January 21, 2022 @03:39PM (#30029680)
I have not received an email, but logging in to the account there's a notice now that tells me about the impending changes.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It's finally time to migrate away, I've been putting it off, but so far the accounts I created seem to have mostly become dormant, so only one user has to change, and I'll just re-create them an IMAP account for their mail, they don't use any other services.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by filchermcurr on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:48AM (#30005993)
Mine is also around 2008. No e-mail, nothing in the billing section, and nothing in the dashboard.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by henriks on Thursday January 20, 2022 @02:29AM (#30005850)
No communications to my account from '06 either, first read about this here.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by y4mi on Thursday January 20, 2022 @06:06AM (#30007359)
> Basically every bullet point you listed is wrong. The remaining pool of users is likely 99% vanity users who would have used Gmail+custom domain forever at no real cost to Google over free Gmail none of which will migrate to Google workspace.

Why do any of your issues in any way contribute to the decision wherever someone should invest their time to create a migration tool so users can switch from the old legacy product to a free account which doesn't have any of the domain features to begin with?

I get that you're unhappy that Google discontinues their free service for you, but that wasn't what the discussion was about.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by michaelmrose on Thursday January 20, 2022 @05:02PM (#30015766)
My point was that you listed 3 factors and asserted that the overlap in a venn diagram would have little overlap. In fact the venn diagram ought to look more like a circle.

All users who signed up for google apps at your domain are in A people who initially signed up. People in B are those who haven't switched away. C are those who are unwilling to pay $72 per user per year.

A->B Very few users change email addresses very frequently because we accumulate 100 or even hundreds of pages with signups under a single address, phones set up under our google account, oauth sign ins, apps and games purchased under our google account. Google accounts are much more sticky than regular email accounts and people rarely abandon those. I would venture to guess the list of active accounts in B is most of A.

B->C Very few people who signed up for $10 a year for 10-50 addresses are going to be onboard with paying between $720 and $3600 a year. C includes 99.9% of B.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by binkHN on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:37PM (#30001419)
I agree with everything you posted here! With one exception. The number of accounts, originally, was unlimited—you just needed to request them.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by quesomaster9000 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @04:03PM (#30000094)
You're forgetting the circle of ageing techies that used to use AltaVista and now (in)directly control large budgets, have long memories and significant clout when it comes to guiding our replacements into making the right decisions and educating them about corporate (mis)trust.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by blagie on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @09:06PM (#30003423)
I'm in that circle. I've cost Google millions of dollars in business due to a history of similar dick moves on their part. This adds just one more to the list. The organization I work at will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever consider using Google for anything business-critical, and neither will businesses I advise in various roles.

I have at least a dozen relatives on my Google family domain. We're looking at a lifetime cost of tens of thousands of dollars if I were to switch to Workspace, which is a non-starter.

One possibility is to finally incorporate my family foundation as a 501(c)3, if we can do that in time. It's been on my to do list.

I'm not even sure where to go from here, but I have things like Android apps I've bought on this account, as does my family. Or I guess the word is "rented." I have a bunch of logins with Google OAuth. Or I guess past tense.

I feel like there's a class action in here somewhere.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by y4mi on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @04:10PM (#30000184)
Uh, why do they matter in the context of a potential side project to let people migrate their Mails from the discontinued free legacy project to a free private account?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by quesomaster9000 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:08PM (#30001009)
Because sometimes you have to "do the right thing" and not be an arse, despite what the metrics say.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by webmaven on Friday January 21, 2022 @01:47PM (#30028123)
> Its not just googlers, the legacy accounts where available to everyone at the start.

Right, but only (some) Googlers are in a position to solve the problem by applying 20% time to it.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by Thorrez on Thursday January 20, 2022 @03:29AM (#30006292)
Why would it be a paid tool? I would assume it would be free.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mgraczyk on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @03:20PM (#29999441)
This would not be a 20% project, it would require at least 2 engineers full time for several months. I'm not even a web developer.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by webmaven on Friday January 21, 2022 @01:40PM (#30028023)
So, how many Googlers using their 20% time would it take (I know it would be more than 10)?
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by michaelmrose on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:26PM (#30001251)
Its a man year to migrate per user 10 Google app accounts to 10 Gmail accounts?

That seems... wrong. Do you actually work at Google?

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mgraczyk on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:31PM (#30001333)
I do, and I'd encourage you to try to ship a user-facing feature that transfers control of user data between different authentication users at a big tech company if you're skeptical.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by inyorgroove on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:06PM (#30002350)
Someone else in the thread mentioned that Education users can migrate their accounts out of the organization to free gmail amounts. Surely some or all of that workflow applies to these legacy free accounts too.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by mgraczyk on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @07:17PM (#30002435)
That was me, I'm sure some of it would apply but you still have to build a web app, test it, test the transfer stuff, implement anything that wasn't already implemented for EDU, etc...
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by ikiris on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @08:04PM (#30002867)
Not to mention maintain it against the constant library churn.

Anyone who was ever an Xoogler knows this is basically a non starter. The privacy issues alone are radioactive as far as desirability to chase.

Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by michaelmrose on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @06:48PM (#30002166)
Presumably just leaving users with 10 accounts not attached to a company would cost zero dollars.
Re:Google requiring all ‘G Suite legacy free edition’ users ... by michaelmrose on Thursday January 20, 2022 @12:40AM (#30005160)
Pardon I meant that question literally not sarcastically. As in is this an actual estimate based on understanding the nature of the problem or an estimate from the outside.