[0]https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/brea...
It is used to reduce the force of any criticism of CCP. Human rights are universal and know no national borders [1].
That being said, thanks for qualifying the often repeated statement in this thread about US prisons. Surely, more needs to be done. That does not mean we need to be silent about Xinjiang slave concentration camps.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893724 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893855
Whether you dismiss them is up to you, but the fact remains that numerous sources have reported on the existence of Chinese Concentration Camps.
Are you really suggesting keeping criminals who have had a trial and been found guilty by a jury of their peers is at all the same as a genocidal racial based campaign to remove an ethnic minority?
[1] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_internment_camps
[2] - https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/02/asia/xinjiang-china-...
[3] - https://www.rand.org/blog/rand-review/2021/04/chinas-disappe...
[4] - https://2017-2021.state.gov/ccpabuses
[5] - https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uyghurs-x...
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
(1) Provide correct information in a way that is more substantive and more respectful than the comment you're replying to;
and/or
(2) Chalk it up to the internet being wrong about everything and walk away (silently—not with a swipe).
As a side point, you'll usually end up at #2 anyhow, because #1 usually provokes more of the same, so after a certain number of iterations you'll find yourself in a tit-for-tat entanglement, which is greatly to be avoided.
The question is what is the optimal number of iterations. Probably it's 1. Maybe 2. Not 3. 4 is right out.
You constantly try to debase the conversation. Someone even reposted your comments to highlight how disingenuous your comments are [0]. Others have repeatedly pointed out how your comments have nothing to do with the current subject matter [1] or are simply regurgitating CCP talking points [2].
Clearly, engaging with your comments is not constructive. You are not interested in a genuine conversation. You attempt to deflate a potentially constructive conversation thread at every turn and trigger a flame war.
But it is a testament to Hacker News that by and large, the community has recognized your comments and efforts to derail the conversation for what they are.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29894558 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893838 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29896092 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893832
Seems like some people insist on being loud even when it doesn't happen in China.
The entire mass internment propaganda drive was concocted on less media access to XJ than the what APNEWs article reporting of it's dismantling. China like most countries, are not US, they don't need to maintain forever prison industrial complexes. BTW the same western analysts that alleged mass internment in XJ also concluded that mass internment phase is over, with ~50k transferred to long term internment and masses back out with gen pop in an elevated security environment, but no longer interned. The persistent allegations now is that labour rural transfer programs that's been ongoing for 20+ years throughout the country is somehow coerced labour when there's no to weak evidence.
When they exist. We know they exist in the US (private prisons), but there are no reliable sources that confirm they still exist in China.