News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:33AM (#29893699)
>Most people would be unequivocally against slave concentration camps.

When they exist. We know they exist in the US (private prisons), but there are no reliable sources that confirm they still exist in China.

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by jimbob45 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:44AM (#29893893)
Private prisons are well on their way to extinction in America [0]. They're hardly the same issue they were in the 90s.

[0]https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/brea...

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by network2592 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:55AM (#29894058)
The "look at your own backyard first" is a common technique used by Wumao [0].

It is used to reduce the force of any criticism of CCP. Human rights are universal and know no national borders [1].

That being said, thanks for qualifying the often repeated statement in this thread about US prisons. Surely, more needs to be done. That does not mean we need to be silent about Xinjiang slave concentration camps.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893724 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893855

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by design-material on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:51AM (#29893995)
There are numerous reliable sources that have confirmed the existence of Chinese Concentration Camps.

Whether you dismiss them is up to you, but the fact remains that numerous sources have reported on the existence of Chinese Concentration Camps.

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by vorpalhex on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:56AM (#29894072)
We have satellite photos, eye witness testimony and even the Chinese government admits the facilities are there but has some nonsense about the people there choosing to be in a barbed wire facility with armed guards.

Are you really suggesting keeping criminals who have had a trial and been found guilty by a jury of their peers is at all the same as a genocidal racial based campaign to remove an ethnic minority?

[1] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_internment_camps

[2] - https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/02/asia/xinjiang-china-...

[3] - https://www.rand.org/blog/rand-review/2021/04/chinas-disappe...

[4] - https://2017-2021.state.gov/ccpabuses

[5] - https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uyghurs-x...

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:34PM (#29897444)
I'm sorry, but your state media lied to you again: nobody is claiming those institutions don't exist. They do exist - and they are mostly similar to western youth correctional facilities. (Except in China you can't get imprisoned there simply because you wealthy parents wish so - differently from the US, where the "troubled teen camps" are a proper industry.)
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by vorpalhex on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @05:24PM (#29899079)
Sure, every country on earth keeps their ethnic minorities in a barbed wire facility where they can't leave and are kept under watch by armed guards. Yes, very normal. Nothing to see here. Ignore the DOZENS of facilities with tens of thousands of inmates who have stories of forced sterilization.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @06:12PM (#29899780)
This description matches American prisons pretty well. Of course US puts many more people there.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by 1024core on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:55PM (#29895022)
You most likely don't care, but if you want to be educated, here are some Vice documentaries: https://www.vice.com/en/topic/uighur
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by network2592 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:24PM (#29897310)
Parent comment may not care. But just wanted to thank you for the link. Had just seen one documentary piece on VICE. I was not aware of these other pieces.
[dead]
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by dang on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @11:48PM (#29916978)
Please stop perpetuating flamewars on Hacker News. We've had to ask you this many times before. Eventually we ban such accounts.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Thursday January 13, 2022 @07:00AM (#29919757)
Should I just ignore FUD then, or is there some way to respond to FUD in a way that doesn’t tend to provoke flame wars?
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by dang on Thursday January 13, 2022 @10:45AM (#29921942)
Good question. The two things that seem to work are:

(1) Provide correct information in a way that is more substantive and more respectful than the comment you're replying to;

and/or

(2) Chalk it up to the internet being wrong about everything and walk away (silently—not with a swipe).

As a side point, you'll usually end up at #2 anyhow, because #1 usually provokes more of the same, so after a certain number of iterations you'll find yourself in a tit-for-tat entanglement, which is greatly to be avoided.

The question is what is the optimal number of iterations. Probably it's 1. Maybe 2. Not 3. 4 is right out.

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by network2592 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @06:54PM (#29900221)
My comment is at the top of this thread. So naturally, I have made a genuine effort to reply to replies.

You constantly try to debase the conversation. Someone even reposted your comments to highlight how disingenuous your comments are [0]. Others have repeatedly pointed out how your comments have nothing to do with the current subject matter [1] or are simply regurgitating CCP talking points [2].

Clearly, engaging with your comments is not constructive. You are not interested in a genuine conversation. You attempt to deflate a potentially constructive conversation thread at every turn and trigger a flame war.

But it is a testament to Hacker News that by and large, the community has recognized your comments and efforts to derail the conversation for what they are.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29894558 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893838 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29896092 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893832

[dead]
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:53PM (#29897694)
No idea about Wumaos, in the west it might have been popularised by the Bible ("a beam in ones eye"). Still, pointing out that the accuser is doing it simply to deflect attention from much worse crimes they have committed seems universal.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by dirtyid on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:55AM (#29894067)
> silent if it happens in China.

Seems like some people insist on being loud even when it doesn't happen in China.

The entire mass internment propaganda drive was concocted on less media access to XJ than the what APNEWs article reporting of it's dismantling. China like most countries, are not US, they don't need to maintain forever prison industrial complexes. BTW the same western analysts that alleged mass internment in XJ also concluded that mass internment phase is over, with ~50k transferred to long term internment and masses back out with gen pop in an elevated security environment, but no longer interned. The persistent allegations now is that labour rural transfer programs that's been ongoing for 20+ years throughout the country is somehow coerced labour when there's no to weak evidence.