News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by vorpalhex on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @11:56AM (#29894072)
We have satellite photos, eye witness testimony and even the Chinese government admits the facilities are there but has some nonsense about the people there choosing to be in a barbed wire facility with armed guards.

Are you really suggesting keeping criminals who have had a trial and been found guilty by a jury of their peers is at all the same as a genocidal racial based campaign to remove an ethnic minority?

[1] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_internment_camps

[2] - https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/02/asia/xinjiang-china-...

[3] - https://www.rand.org/blog/rand-review/2021/04/chinas-disappe...

[4] - https://2017-2021.state.gov/ccpabuses

[5] - https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-repression-uyghurs-x...

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @03:34PM (#29897444)
I'm sorry, but your state media lied to you again: nobody is claiming those institutions don't exist. They do exist - and they are mostly similar to western youth correctional facilities. (Except in China you can't get imprisoned there simply because you wealthy parents wish so - differently from the US, where the "troubled teen camps" are a proper industry.)
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by vorpalhex on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @05:24PM (#29899079)
Sure, every country on earth keeps their ethnic minorities in a barbed wire facility where they can't leave and are kept under watch by armed guards. Yes, very normal. Nothing to see here. Ignore the DOZENS of facilities with tens of thousands of inmates who have stories of forced sterilization.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @06:12PM (#29899780)
This description matches American prisons pretty well. Of course US puts many more people there.