News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by CottonMcKnight on Saturday December 25, 2021 @05:23PM (#29687563)
So, AWS is hoping to exploit developers' willingness to do free work in exchange for nebulous "reputation" points ("Klout", anyone?) that they have been convinced is worth something on their resumes.

Instead of actually providing a real technical support team.

Well, they've successfully convinced thousands of developers that AWS certifications are worth thousands of dollars, so I expect it might actually work.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by jackthetab on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:36PM (#29688484)
Two things.

Thing the First: > Instead of actually providing a real technical support team.

Apparently you've never used their tech support team. It is by far one of, if not the best, technical support teams I've ever dealt with. Not only technical knowledge but dealing with customers, providing help above and beyond the actual question in front of their face, etc. The only other technical support team that has impressed me this much is Kraken's.

Yes, I have to pay for that support. I also pay for tech support for other things: my automobile ("What's wrong with my flugelmesserbeano?"), for my medical conditions ("Is it safe to take these two medications together?"), for my house exterior ("If I don't fix that drainage problem what could happen in five years?"), for my house interior ("How should I Remodel the kitchen to fit my lifestyle?"), etc.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by jackthetab on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:19PM (#29688759)
Thing the Second:

> Well, they've successfully convinced thousands of developers that AWS certifications are worth thousands of dollars

and quoting CactusOnFire > I got one of the AWS certifications. I know it's a scam.

I too used to look down on certification.

I made a damn good living "doing computers" (still do): networking, development, what's now called BI reporting, backup and restores, etc. This for multiple startups, SMBs and $BIGCORPs.

I then wanted to get into training: MCSE, SCSA, LPI, etc. For that, I had to be certified. No problem, I thought, certifications are for fools and children; this will be a cake walk.

Great Ghu! There was _so_ _much_ I didn't know or even know about. Certifications filled in _so_ many gaps and minutiae. (You don't know what you don't know.) Not only did it fill in the gaps, allowing me to better utilize the knowledge I already had it let me make more sense of those shapes I see off in the tech horizon.

Now because I have these certs, should you then treat me as if I was the next coming of Ritchie? :-|

Certs show that you have a _base_ knowledge, not that your the reincarnation of Turing.

Are there people who abuse the system? Sure! Name a system involving humans that isn't/hasn't been abused, corrupted, and twisted beyond what it was meant to do. Go ahead. I'll wait.

I've come to the conclusion that people who sht on people (mostly utes [sic]) for getting technical certifications are the same ones who sht on recent high school graduates: Oh, you have a high school diploma? How nice. /s It says here you took English and math classes. Let's see how good you are. Write a 5,000 word dissertation on the impact of Don Quixote on Western literature, then prove Fermat's Last Theorem. If you can't do that in 30 minutes, GTFO you poser.'

What's that? You don't treat ppl with high school diplomas or bachelor/masters' degrees like that? Then why treat people going after certs like that?

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by 3np on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:29AM (#29689991)
What has been your most worthwhile certifications, knowledge- and content-wise?

(Also, if you’re going to say “shit”, please just write it out. If not, use a different word)

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by iamtedd on Sunday December 26, 2021 @01:52AM (#29690338)
Putting asterisks in those two words made everything between italicised.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by hericium on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:32AM (#29690473)
> their tech support team. It is by far one of, if not the best, technical support teams I've ever dealt with. (...) Yes, I have to pay for that support.

My experience is very much the opposite of what you wrote, both with free support and paid Amazon Managed Services. Their support can often be as helpful and truthful as their piece of crap parody of a services health dashboard[1].

> I also pay for tech support for other things: my automobile

When your vehicle is under warranty, you've already paid for checks and repairs upfront. Just like you pay for amzn's services. You can buy additional support for your car and cloud stuff, and better private healthcare, but you don't _have_to_ if you've paid for warranty or insurance. Depends of course on use case and what you need: help building stuff or help figuring out why isn't stuff working as you'd like it to. When you want Amazon to simply fix their shit, paying for support smells like an extortion and pushing you to forums will give them more time to not provide fixes.

Therefore I think that the commenter you are responding to is right: Amazon seems to be attempting to acquire free workforce and pushing their customers to "community support" or whatever shitty phrasing they'll use to set up a barrier between a customer and their actual employees. And they do have a long history of exploiting and even destroying their customers (diapers dot com etc).

I believe that the problem Amazon has right now is that they created certification-based business model which was one of factors raising salaries in the sector but they would still like to pay shit and overwork their staff paid in peanuts.

And while I know what salaries can an engineer expect for working for AWS in the US, I don't remember when was the last time I dealt with non-Indian reps.

[1] status.aws.amazon.com

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by mjlee on Sunday December 26, 2021 @05:25AM (#29691187)
> I don't remember when was the last time I dealt with non-Indian reps.

Is it possible you normally deal with support within the same 8 hour window? I believe they have a global rota, I often end up talking to reps in Ireland.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by mst on Sunday December 26, 2021 @04:29AM (#29690940)
Instead of your [1] might I recommend https://stop.lying.cloud/ instead?
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by hericium on Sunday December 26, 2021 @04:53AM (#29691031)
Indeed, this site recently timing out or not resolving was a good indicator of at least CloudFront or Route 53 issues.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by CactusOnFire on Saturday December 25, 2021 @05:43PM (#29687710)
I got one of the AWS certifications.

I know it's a scam. HR teams don't. If ponying up $400 every 3 years gets me a more senior position with slightly better compensation, it's worth the ROI.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by colechristensen on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:20PM (#29687989)
Really only applicable at certain kinds of company, leaning on certifications usually means it’s a very bureaucratic company or one with not enough competency to figure out if a candidate is any good.

Likewise if a candidate has a lot of certifications there’s usually a question “does this person really know their stuff or are they just good at taking tests “

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tyingq on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:11PM (#29688347)
>"does this person really know their stuff or are they just good at taking tests"

Which is interesting, given that the places that should be able to tell if a person really knows their stuff tend to lean hard on "leetcode" type interviews. Which is basically "is this candidate good at memorization and taking tests?"

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tibbar on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:36PM (#29688861)
There is an aspect of hackerrank-style questions that tests raw preparation, but in my experience interviewing people with customized/twist versions of these problems, nobody is just coding up a solution they memorized either. They’re composing ideas they already know, but this is exactly the skill we want to test them for anyway. I will grant that being a good test taker, calm under pressure and relaxed enough to talk through the solution, working methodically until the end, these skills do make a huge difference in interview performance. In my opinion it is the candidate’s responsibility to prepare for the interview environment as well.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tyingq on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:49PM (#29688948)
My opinion is that you're missing a lot of good talent with this sort of approach. There are people that are just as good/fast at solving problems in a quiet space with the ability to play around with trial and error in an actual dev environment. They can answer your questions well too, given some time to mull it over quietly.

Being able to do it on a whiteboard with people around you, and answering questions right when they are asked is a skill, I admit. It's a poor analog for what the work usually ends up being, though.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tibbar on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:12PM (#29695332)
There was a time when candidates would get stuck on a problem and I would tell them "if you want, keep working on this problem and email me tonight with your work." Most people didn't follow up, but some people did, and we usually hired them. They usually had very high grit and follow through, but were unfortunately (as a rule) slower and generally worse at their jobs than other hires. We had to let one of these people go despite his excellent communication and organization skills. Today I can rely on a stronger recruiting pipeline so I don't need to make exceptions like this, but I'm not really sure if I would go back given the chance.

No matter how much grit you have, if it takes you 10 hours to do what everyone else is doing in 1 hour, you will struggle _a lot_ at your job.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tyingq on Sunday December 26, 2021 @10:56PM (#29698979)
Perhaps the working environment just isn't what I'm used to. Assuming the interview is closed book, no internet, you're measuring recall against whatever random questions you ask. It's hard for me to picture that really mapping against the real work at hand.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by amusedcyclist on Saturday December 25, 2021 @09:25PM (#29689111)
Theres generally no memorization required for leetcode style interviews, its about having a strong background in algorithms and data structures
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tyingq on Sunday December 26, 2021 @01:06PM (#29694735)
I say memorization because they don't allow you to look anything up. I can, for example, look at a problem and remember vaguely that there's an algorithm and/or data structure that's ideal for solving it and some of the high level concepts/keywords I would need to find it. I also know the right google foo to find it again, see if it's still current best practice, find a decent implementation of it, where good documentation is, and so on.

I can't always bang it out on a whiteboard from memory though. If I could, I don't think that would somehow make me a better developer. It might make be a better T/A in an academic environment, but that's not typically what these kind of interviews are hiring for.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by pjmlp on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:53PM (#29694584)
Which basically limits to newly graduates or those lucky to work in domains where dealing with leetcode style programming is daily stuff.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by amusedcyclist on Sunday December 26, 2021 @06:15PM (#29697304)
Yeah thats fair , definitely agree that its more useful when interviewing new grads
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by btown on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:43PM (#29688147)
> to figure out if a candidate is any good

In a lot of organizations, the people responsible for identifying if a candidate is "good" and the people who are responsible for calibrating their offer, and where they enter a ladder in terms of seniority, are entirely different groups. Certifications are justifiable insofar as they're aimed entirely at the latter.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by iamleppert on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:03PM (#29688303)
And those are precisely the organizations I avoid like the plague. I’ve gotten to offer stage before and sensed this type of disconnect and promptly declined to continue in the process. It’s a huge red flag if the finances of a technical organization are controlled by people who don’t understand technology and consequently that unable to ascertain and appropriately appraise value.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by pjmlp on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:54PM (#29694594)
Many of those organisations are strong contributors to the FOSS that everyone around here enjoys playing with.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by robertlagrant on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:31PM (#29688063)
Curious to know what % of all companies you probed to get to your "usually".
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by colechristensen on Saturday December 25, 2021 @11:24PM (#29689654)
Many dozens through the years and across the spectrum of industries, company sizes, and ages.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by robertlagrant on Sunday December 26, 2021 @04:51PM (#29696732)
Dozens of %?
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by albert_e on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:21AM (#29689961)
I have a few certifications.

all AWS certs are paid for by my employer through exam vouchers -- who in turn gets free/discounted exam vouchers from AWS through their partnership either directly or indirectly discounted through partner credits worth hundreds and thousands of dollars of AWS usage that we as an org definitely use up to offset our consumption bills.

I personally never paid a single dollar for AWS cert exam.

I did pay for a few AWS exam prep courses and study resources -- and some of them were reimbursed by my employer.

You don't have to renew all your expired certs if you don't see the need and you have moved on to bigger/different things in your career.

In my experience studying for a cert exam fills in gaps and brings you up to date on best practices and newer features.

I don't believe anyone's job is so broad and deep at the same time that their hands-on experience makes the certification completely redundant.

EDIT:

Here is a person sharing their experience -- he/she may be overdoing it with the number of certs but they are looking at certs as a means to learn more beyond their current job role and look for career growth

https://www.reddit.com/r/AWSCertifications/comments/ks28yi/7...

If nothing, the knowledge from the certs give you the necessary footing to approach your next project/job with the right mindset in areas your previous experience may not have exposed you to.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by hericium on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:20AM (#29690435)
I had one of their certifications. It expired a few years back and I don't intend to renew it or acquire a new one. Below position presented to HR or tech hiring people usually works:

"I used to have AWS certification. Amazon even prolonged it from 2 to 3 years but I had no reasons to renew it afterwards. I still work on this stuff and my practical knowledge isn't outdated. I won't remember what pricing tricks every single service has but I'm able to quickly set up or fix things"

Sure, there are businesses that require you to have a shiny, fresh certifications. There are also companies that value their employees' and contractors' ability to choose what is worth doing and what seems to be a waste of time and energy.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by 123pie123 on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:37PM (#29688495)
just another sales tactic like the old MSCE reinvented, nothing has changed

the circle has been reinvented - again!

Lets call it the circle reinvention club or does this already exist?

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by yob28 on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:11PM (#29687916)
I’ve never paid for one, get your company to pay the fees
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by ozzythecat on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:00PM (#29688640)
It hasn’t been free, but I’ve regularly used AWS support. My experience has been nothing but very positive.

Meta comment — It’s disappointing the top voted comment does nothing but spread negativity. I see attitude like this that automatically assumes the worst in anything ever happening and tries to poison the well for others. I’m grateful and incredibly lucky that my co workers aren’t like this.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by theteapot on Sunday December 26, 2021 @03:10AM (#29690632)
Which well? The well of positivity has been poisoned?
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by dataminded on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:58PM (#29688276)
AWS enterprise support is amazing. Everything from calls and emails to multi-day workshops with the product team. You get more than you pay for with them.

I'm also a fan of the AWS certifications from the employee side. Not everybody is pulling X00K at a FAANG. If you want a cloud job at regular enterprise, it's a good way to get your foot in the door.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by netfortius on Sunday December 26, 2021 @03:54AM (#29690811)
You must have not tried to use Outposts when they came out.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by twosugars on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:36PM (#29688485)
Because if you rate 1 star that is going to their annual performance, it is very stressful job to work at aws support, in an year you would have to be get 4.8 overall rating which is very hard to get because for the most part customers doesn't rate when they had good experience.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by Hikikomori on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:09PM (#29687905)
Any contact I've had with AWS support has been excellent, but we also pay for premium/enterprise/whatever. Had a bug with a recently released API and got attention from the engineering team to fix it.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by sofixa on Saturday December 25, 2021 @05:40PM (#29687687)
They do provide a real technical support team, you just have to pay for it.

And they state it will be driven by customers, partners and employees of AWS, so at least on paper they aren't fully relying on customers.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tibbar on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:43PM (#29688912)
If they do it right, they’ll treat this internally as a user feedback forum. If a question about a service has hundreds of upvotes that almost certainly means the service itself should change so that either the answer to the question is obvious or (better) the question is no longer meaningful. Here’s hoping!
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by jlarocco on Saturday December 25, 2021 @11:08PM (#29689575)
AWS actually has fantastic support, especially for a tech company. My previous company was tiny, and super cheap (they wouldn't even pay for Slack), and even at that level we never had a problem talking to real, live support people, and they were always pretty helpful.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by nnurmanov on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:51AM (#29690547)
I created brainpick.co.uk, where people who have given up hopes to resolve the issue, could sponsor a question, so people could work for money, instead of reputation.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by peakaboo on Sunday December 26, 2021 @03:47AM (#29690785)
I think the certifications are worth it, at least the pro level ones. Because they do give you a full picture of good AWS architecture and what services are a good fit together.

I've seen what some developers without certifications put together on AWS and it's a mess.

But this re:Post thing I don't believe in personally. I'm so tired of these giant tech companies building walled gardens and censoring and controlling anyone inside.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by unbanned on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:18PM (#29687973)
Like Aws heros already do for marketing and awareness lol
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by tokumei on Saturday December 25, 2021 @11:21PM (#29689637)
AWS has good support if you’re a high-level customer. We have a rep we can arrange meetings with on a days notice if we need anything.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by TeeMassive on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:51AM (#29690549)
> So, AWS is hoping to exploit developers' willingness to do free work in exchange for nebulous "reputation" points

For me putting my SO profile in my resume really was a boon that allowed me to skip a lot of the technical interview (not all of it, of course).

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by emptysongglass on Sunday December 26, 2021 @01:05AM (#29690143)
> Instead of actually providing a real technical support team

You sound like someone who has exactly zero dealings with AWS support. They set the bar in this industry. The first thing I do when I join a new employer is reach out to our Account Manager or Technical Account Manager at AWS to set up bi-weekly cadence meetings and ask for specific criticism from their Solutions Architects on whatever I'm thinking of implementing. They will ask my team for feedback on next features they're thinking to implement.

They have been the finest design partners I have ever encountered. I consider my last AM a friend.

Your comment is of such poor quality, it should be flagged for misinformation, and I almost never flag here on HN, even on politically divisive subjects.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by amznbyebyebye on Saturday December 25, 2021 @08:49PM (#29688945)
First post FUD needs to be autobanned on HN. This toxic negativity leaves such a poor taste in my mouth
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by gopher_space on Saturday December 25, 2021 @10:11PM (#29689328)
The flip side is that I’ve had such negative experiences with Amazon across all of their services that the people in this thread talking about how wonderful support has been seem like shills.

I think it’s possible to damage your reputation beyond repair, making even ridiculous claims sound plausible.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by jen20 on Saturday December 25, 2021 @10:56PM (#29689518)
I just checked the numbers - in 2021 I opened 19 AWS support cases. Every single one of them was resolved quickly and satisfactorily.

By contrast in a previous job I dealt with Azure support on the regular, an experience which was akin to pulling teeth.

I’ve yet to actually get through to a support person at GCP whenever I’ve tried.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by amznbyebyebye on Saturday December 25, 2021 @11:46PM (#29689792)
At AWS support has a direct line to product and engineering service teams so if support can’t resolve it, there is an engineer on call who can help out depending on the need. Worst case they don’t support what is needed and it goes on the backlog.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by 1123581321 on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:23AM (#29690442)
That doesn't have anything to do with the comment in question, other than both of you dislike Amazon.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by gopher_space on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:37PM (#29694414)
My point is that I’m primed to believe FUD due to past behavior.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by 1123581321 on Sunday December 26, 2021 @12:54PM (#29694598)
Right, but that is a problem you should work on once you identify it. It’s not good that low quality speculation is believable; there isn’t really any justifiable motivation to reflexively support it.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by gopher_space on Sunday December 26, 2021 @03:32PM (#29696027)
Why would I discard my personal experience for someone else’s? Why would anyone expect me to?

It only takes a day to burn the bridge you spent a year building.

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by 1123581321 on Sunday December 26, 2021 @03:46PM (#29696160)
I can’t say I expect you to change, no. :)
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by artursapek on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:37PM (#29688096)
Why is topcommentguy on HN always shitting on the post subject
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by staticassertion on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:56PM (#29688606)
There's this mistake people make, especially in tech, where if someone says "X is bad" people think "Wow, they must really know about X". There's tons of 'hot takes' and criticism because it's really easy to look and feel smart when you're the person levying those.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by ARandomerDude on Saturday December 25, 2021 @06:41PM (#29688130)
I actually appreciate it. I'll often read the article then check the comments for the other viewpoint(s).
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by sangnoir on Sunday December 26, 2021 @02:01PM (#29695248)
Because you can't downvote an HN post, and shouldn't downvote when you disagree, so people end up upvoting contrary opinions they agree with. The sequence is usually [Post with a position A] -> top comment (disagrees with position A) -> top child comment (disagrees with top comment, usually focusing a single, least-significant point raised by top comment)
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by Msw242 on Saturday December 25, 2021 @10:22PM (#29689378)
And then the top response to the top response is usually pedantic strawmanning
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by anothernewdude on Sunday December 26, 2021 @01:04AM (#29690141)
Yes, they're duplicating Stack Overflow.
Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by staticassertion on Saturday December 25, 2021 @07:54PM (#29688597)
> AWS is hoping to exploit developers' willingness to do free work in exchange for nebulous "reputation" points

Like literally everyone else?

Re:Amazon Introduces Re:Post, a “Stack Overflow” for AWS by jsemrau on Sunday December 26, 2021 @04:51AM (#29691020)
finclout.io solves that better. No more "free work" for klout.