>Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
>Biden said the jab stop the spread, it was lies (I remember)
That is all I can see as far as "medical information" goes. What a joke. This song is bad, it would have fallen off the charts if they just let things go.
[0] https://mychords.net/en/bryson-gray/157414-bryson-gray-lets-...
After the reading the news article in full, I found the video and watched it once in full. After that, I searched and found the lyrics to the video. I'm over explaining, but I'm rate limited.
I dont see much that would support the reason YouTube gave for banning it.
FWIW, I am against censorship.
Check this song out, it gives practical advice for carrying out burglaries. People have screamed and kicked but YouTube won't remove the song.
Thing is, if I remember rightly Biden did spread outright misinformation that falsely claimed the vaccine was a lot more effective than it actually is using his platform as president, and got checked on it by the BBC (though maybe not the mainstream US media)...
It was rather cool to be anti vaccine 1 year ago. Now its verboten.
I do not intend for this post to be anti Biden. Trump is also a hypocrite, just not on his pro covid vaccine stance.
"I personally believe X, but my constituents overwhelmingly support Y, so I will be voting for Y."
But, I’ve heard the “planned” argument levied against the CCP, and that it was a bio weapon, and this was a planned release. That argument, while still far fetched, is at least in the realm of possibility for me.
A case in point is Christina Bobb, who works as a propagandist for OANN under 1st amendment journalistic protections, but showed her true colors on Jan 6 by working with Rudy G and John Eastman at the Willard to overturn the election result. At that point I think she is no longer entitled to legal protections afforded journalists.
- You can still disagree with a private company
- We as a society are thoroughly divided on that, and many disagree that issues of rights and morality are decided democratically
- Political speech you disagree with has valueI left out the "protecting our children" platitude. Thought it might be a little bit over the top. ;-)
In any case, I think Glenn Greenwald has the best take on internet censorship:
https://greenwald.substack.com/p/democrats-and-media-do-not-...
I agree about Greenwald's take there.
Definitely. Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean it should be censored.
Of course, it's part of democratic debate. Remember America stayed out of World War 2 until Pearl Harbor. Lindbergh's argument from the video you link is completely reasonable.
If it were F@ck Donald (whatever) and everything else the same it would still be up.
The rest is nothing but naked excuse.
There are so many medically misleading things on YouTube —just look at dieting. They cause harm. Let me see them pull those.
Nah, they won’t.
Honestly, I think “Pravda” would be proud of the gall.