Reminds me of American Psycho, where everybody is a damn Vice President (reflective of the time)
People do care that someone will show up and answer all their questions in a thorough and non-elitist (read: talking over people's heads) way.
It's probably also worth noting that title can impact pay when it comes to a job; a lot of companies have pay caps based on title.
Really, my point was that title is more than just self-gratification.
Reflective of the industry, really. It’s still that way in banking.
My understanding was that this still happens as a way to get around corporate card policies (either from the company or the credit company) that prevent anyone with a lower-than-leadership title from having signature power for purchasing. Want to give someone a corporate card so they can buy their own necessities? Give them a VP title.
This isn't true for tech companies (except maybe the antiquated ones). At my current firm, everyone got a corp card on request.
It's a little cheeky and at times a little hyperbolic, but I stand by it.
Quote from TFA "For those in an underrepresented group, titles make a world of difference in establishing credibility."
What that permitted me to learn about myself is that - at the end of the day - I just like solving interesting and challenging problems, working with colleagues as equals, and creating products and solutions that I'm proud of. I have utterly no interest any more in climbing any sorts of ladders, or "chasing" a role, position, or title because I think that'll somehow be the road to riches. Having autonomy, the flexibility to work when I'm productive and inspired (and to not work when not), and interesting/meaningful work is infinitely more important than role or salary. I also feel like I'm not the first person to come to this conclusion.