News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by RKearney on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:35PM (#28295290)
> Why is everyone so confused that smart TVs are popular?

Because almost all of them use internet connectivity to show you ads on home screens.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by throw03172019 on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:46PM (#28295385)
I disconnect from WiFi. It makes my “smart” tv a normal one that doesn’t serve my shitty ads, lag or turn on some random SamsungTV channel.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by savant_penguin on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:57PM (#28295491)
Just because you disconnected it from wifi does not mean they cannot connect it through lte without your knowledge
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by tshaddox on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @07:01PM (#28296050)
It's also true (by definition) that literally any device that you own could be connecting through LTE without your knowledge.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by GoblinSlayer on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @11:28AM (#28302859)
Is LTE a synonym for free internet? Who pays for connection?
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by nmstoker on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @08:13PM (#28296629)
Maybe your comment was tongue in cheek but if the product did not reveal it contained a radio transmitter, this would undoubtedly be illegal in the US, EU & UK.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by jen20 on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @09:05PM (#28296964)
And what will you do when there are no TVs to buy that do not contain LTE transmitters to force more spying upon you?
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by oblio on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @11:32PM (#28297778)
Do most of them contain LTE transmitters? Is their share increasing?
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by jen20 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @12:16AM (#28297987)
I don’t know, but it’s not long ago that TVs did not spy on you or serve you personalised ads, and now they all do, so it’s not exactly a huge stretch.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by throwawayboise on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @06:03PM (#28295546)
I guess that's one benefit of not having a usable mobile signal at my house.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by wwn_se on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @02:30AM (#28298591)
Well that's illegal in almost all (western) countries. A device need to have an declaration of all radio equipment inside in some form (depending on locale).

It also would be a lot harder to profit from ads when you have to pay for lte bandwidth especially with the prices in the US.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by zinekeller on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @02:52AM (#28298700)
(not op)

> Well that's illegal in almost all (western) countries. A device need to have an declaration of all radio equipment inside in some form (depending on locale).

I agree, but I'm pretty sure that it will be buried on the declarations page.

> It also would be a lot harder to profit from ads when you have to pay for lte bandwidth especially with the prices in the US.

You vastly overestimated the costs of wholesale network access, which is surprisingly cheap, that's why Kindles (for the most part) do have Amazon-provided SIM cards. Bad news is that you can't get it: basically you need commit to a minimum bandwidth (in hundreds of terabytes range) with a minimum subscription count (in hundreds of thousands range) to get these cheap prices, which would be more expensive than individual plans.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by GoblinSlayer on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @11:31AM (#28302923)
Can you extract that SIM card and use for free internet?
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by zinekeller on Thursday August 26, 2021 @01:05AM (#28310910)
Depends? Amazon's SIMs are locked to the specific Kindles, so you need to clone at least the radio identification codes (like IMEI) that is used, and you need to relay that to a specific proxy operated by Amazon because the network-in-question would block (on behalf of Amazon) other servers.

I imagine that in case someone has implemented this, it would be locked in a similar way to ensure that it can only access those ad servers and nothing else.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by throw03172019 on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @04:08PM (#28306267)
That’s true. But it does help with the blocking their ads.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by GoblinSlayer on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @11:27AM (#28302856)
Wrap it in tinfoil.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by Forbo on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @06:02PM (#28295537)
See previous discussion about this problem here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27701977

TL;DR- TVs are using their own cellular connections and/or neighboring open wireless networks.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by gsich on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @07:06PM (#28296099)
>L;DR- TVs are using their own cellular connections

The link doesn't say that.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by rovr138 on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @07:32PM (#28296323)
It links to https://venturebeat.com/2019/05/01/huawei-reportedly-plans-f...

And it opens with,

> Though its 5G products are not entirely welcome in the United States, Huawei is reportedly pushing forward with a unique new product: the world’s first 5G television. As Nikkei reports this morning, the Chinese company plans to use the cellular-enabled TV and new PCs to challenge Samsung’s and Apple’s dominant positions in the global consumer electronics market.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by kelnos on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @08:58PM (#28296910)
That's not really what's being talked about, though. The fear is that if you don't connect your TV to your wifi network, it will have a secret, hidden LTE radio that it uses anyway.

It doesn't seem that Huawei is being at all secretive about this; they are advertising it as a feature.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by Forbo on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @01:35PM (#28304378)
You're ignoring the part where Samsung TVs are actively connecting to open networks.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by gsich on Wednesday August 25, 2021 @03:42AM (#28298998)
That's a single TV, also is this on the market, the link said "reportedly"?

The other comment is also correct.

Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by k4rli on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @05:55PM (#28295472)
With LG C9 I haven't seen a single ad in a year since I've had it. There are large amounts of tracking being blocked by pi.hole however. One LG domain has been blocked 22.5k times in past 8.5 months.
Re:Samsung remotely disables TVs looted from South African w... by kelnos on Tuesday August 24, 2021 @09:00PM (#28296928)
The thing that would bother me about this is that you only know what's being blocked; you have no idea if other spyware is getting through because your pihole just doesn't happen to know about another domain in use.

The only surefire way to block it would be to put some metal or foil around the wifi antenna (or disconnect it entirely, if possible). Otherwise the TV could connect to any random open wifi network it might find (assuming there is one in range). Even if you connect it to your own network and block all its traffic, it might just decide your network is broken and find another one.