RKearney
They return failures and exceptions when attempting to generate the certificate for the .arpa domain and then I spent months trying to get a refund (they are very slow to respond) and only caved once I threatened a chargeback for the service not working as advertised.
Previous Discussions
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49394204
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49302865
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976146
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879897
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859781
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808490
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775198
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48766693
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700646
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664312
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633300
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616793
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48612625
Previous Discussions
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48976146
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879897
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859781
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808490
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775198
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48766693
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700646
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664312
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633300
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616793
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48612625
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48879897
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859781
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48808490
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775198
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48766693
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700646
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48664312
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48633300
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48616793
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48612625
[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45312671
[1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45294981Is this the endpoint you tested against? https://bgp.he.net/dns/t3.storage.dev#_ipinfo
Did you test from a VM in the same cloud that's hosting the product? If so I'm not sure "neutral cloud provider" is an honest statement.
uname -a
Darwin LT-JT6692XPXJ 23.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.5.0: Wed May 1 20:12:58 PDT 2024; root:xnu-10063.121.3~5/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000 arm64
~
ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
options=1203<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TXSTATUS,SW_TIMESTAMP>
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
nd6 options=201<PERFORMNUD,DAD>
~
ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
~ 11s
sudo ifconfig lo0 add 127.0.0.2
Password:
~
ping -c 1 127.0.0.2
PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 127.0.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.824 ms
--- 127.0.0.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.824/0.824/0.824/nan ms
~
ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
options=1203<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TXSTATUS,SW_TIMESTAMP>
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 0xff000000
nd6 options=201<PERFORMNUD,DAD>
~ 1. Unable to rename group chats
2. Photo sharing quality is lowered
3. Video sharing quality is abysmal
4. Messages traverse carrier networks in plain-text
5. Loss of undo send and delete
6. Loss of inline replies
7. Loss of typing indicators and read-receipts (if enabled)
Just to name a few.I'm guessing those quotes were supposed to be " rather than “ and ”.
You seem to be completely ignoring the other aspects of DHCPv6. Your response comes off as extremely hostile towards others who may have different requirements than yours. Please consider that there could be other use cases beyond what you've been exposed to in the past.
It means the Android operating system does not implement the DHCPv6 protocol.
> How is it impacting users?
Users of Android devices will be unable to obtain a managed IPv6 address configuration, other configuration, or request an IPv6 prefix (read: prefix, not address) via DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation.
> Are they crying out about it on support forums for the past several years?
For at least 10 years now[0].
What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.