News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by danaos on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @07:06PM (#26561494)
Uhhh it's in Wikipedia's "largest container ships" list! [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_container_ship...

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by userbinator on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:45PM (#26562191)
...and as the article says, "Furthermore, some of the world's main waterways such as the Suez Canal and Singapore Strait also restrict the maximum dimensions of a ship that can pass through them.", which explains why the list consists of large fleets of ships all almost exactly the same size.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by codewench on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @11:06PM (#26563115)
Much like Panamax being the largest ship size which can traverse the Panama canal, there's a corresponding Suezmax[1]. Sort of like the old story of the Space Shuttle's SRB size being dictated by old Roman road design, it's interesting how modern design is influenced by historical limitations we might not consider.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by nindalf on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @03:05AM (#26564330)
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by m4rtink on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @11:20AM (#26568356)
The Shuttle SRB design still was dictated at least in part by the segments being transported by rail - each individual segment could be only as heavy, wide and long as the cobined stretch of railway from the factory would allow.

It influences other rockets as well - for example the Proton:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_(rocket_family)

The long thin tanks you see mounted on the first stage are not drop tanks or additional boosters, its the tanks holding the first stage fuel, with the central core holding all the oxidzer.

Thats because the core stage is limitted in width by what you can ship to Bayokonur by rail, especialy IIRC one specific rail tunnel on the route. So they ship the core stage and the additional fuel tanks on separate rail cars and then bolt them in place on the cosmodrome.

In similar manner Falcon 9 is limitted to 3.9 m of width as that is the maximum you can ship over the US highway network without special care.

If you want to go bigger, you need special aircraft and barges, or build the thing in place like it is currently being done with the SpaceX Starhip.

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by leoedin on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @06:47AM (#26565558)
One of the main roads near where I live is a Roman road. It's fascinating that the new buildings being built along it have their design constrained, in some way, by a decision made 2000 years ago.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by smilespray on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:00AM (#26566045)
2000 years? Think about how frequently we're hampered by limitations set 13.8 billion years ago...
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by Breza on Friday March 26, 2021 @01:45PM (#26594880)
Reminds me of this excellent old poem: https://poets.org/poem/calf-path
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by GhostVII on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:58PM (#26562278)
In 2016, Prokopowicz and Berg-Andreassen defined a container ship with a capacity of 10,000 to 20,000 TEU as a Very Large Container Ship (VLCS), while that with a capacity greater than 20,000 TEU as an Ultra Large Container Ship (ULCS)

They are gonna run out of larger adjectives pretty soon.

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by aasasd on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:10PM (#26562366)
Just call Capcom.

“Super Container Ship II' Hyper Turbo Extra Special Champion Edition HD Remix”.

Btw, there's a similar conundrum with large telescope projects: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26333391

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by KSteffensen on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @04:40AM (#26564843)
Same with IC size. Started with SSI (Small Scale Integration) then MSI (Medium Scale Integration), LSI (Large Scale Integration) and finally VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) in the early 1980ies. There was some talk of ULSI (Ultra Large Scale Integration), but thankfully this never caught on.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_circuit#ULSI,_WSI,_...

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by ornornor on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @03:30AM (#26564455)
You forgot “Pro”, which is what makes a variant the bigger one.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by dylan604 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:21AM (#26565058)
I thought Pro meant remove all of the ports, and make it ultra thin
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by drewzero1 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:48AM (#26567899)
Removing all of the ports could really be a problem for a ship!
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by dylan604 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:32PM (#26573215)
Nah, there's a dongle to connect to the dock without a port
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by aasasd on Thursday March 25, 2021 @02:34PM (#26583716)
Well, you see, the names I listed above are all actual ones used by Capcom.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by GekkePrutser on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @10:53PM (#26563049)
Almost like a Samsung phone.

Large container ship 20 Ultra Plus 5G Fan edition

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by oblio on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @03:24AM (#26564425)
Samsung at least uses 1 qualifier per device. S21 Plus, S21 Ultra.

Apple's 12 Pro Max, though...

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by berkes on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @03:47AM (#26564539)
The phone gets so hot, it needs a fan?
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by Tepix on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @04:59AM (#26564949)
Like the Nubia Red Magic phones you mean?
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by viraptor on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @01:28AM (#26563911)
While it's not SI yet, they could still use Hella https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hella#SI_prefix

I'm all for Hella Container Ship

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by dylan604 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:22AM (#26565063)
Now, hella is just a modifier. Hella Big Container Ship dwarfs Hella Small Excavator
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by masklinn on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @02:17AM (#26564119)
Screen resolutions have not and they are way worse.

Ship sizes can just reuse that replacing “graphics array” with “container ship” e.g. Quad Size Extended Container Ship.

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by moonbug on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:35AM (#26565143)
they just need to take a lead from astronomers

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwhelmingly_Large_Telesco...

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by ygra on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @04:10AM (#26564658)
That's been the case for display resolutions for a while as well ... although most of them can probably be parsed by the regex [UWXVQ]+GA.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by implements on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:23AM (#26565776)
Well in frequency terminology they’ve still got Super Large, Extremely Large and Terrifically Large left!
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by _Microft on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @04:07AM (#26564640)
Astronomers to the rescue!

https://xkcd.com/1294/

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by Shivetya on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:06AM (#26565684)
True, but it is hard to get the scale of some ships until a real world item people are familiar with is close enough for a comparison.

I remember driving up to one of the battleship memorials as a child and it just seemed like this big gray mountain at the end of the street.

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by ggregoire on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:42AM (#26565895)
Anyone knows why all those Korean, Swiss and Taiwanese ships are registered in Panama instead of their own country?
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by samizdis on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:28AM (#26566281)
It's a system called registering a ship under a "flag of convenience" [1].

Covers lots of questionable business practices, from employment conditions/health and safety, to tax etc.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_convenience

Edited to add this (which I did not know, but think it interesting) from the Wikipedia article:

The modern practice of ships being registered in a foreign country [ie, a flag of convenience] began in the 1920s in the United States when shipowners seeking to serve alcohol to passengers during Prohibition registered their ships in Panama. Owners soon began to perceive advantages in terms of avoiding increased regulations and rising labor costs and continued to register their ships in Panama even after Prohibition ended.

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by martin_a on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:48AM (#26565930)
Just another tax evasion scheme.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by denysvitali on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @01:45AM (#26563997)
I'm surprised Docker is not on that list
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by noarchy on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @08:41PM (#26562165)
>Uhhh it's in Wikipedia's "largest container ships" list!

Off-topic, but does anyone else find it odd to find fillers like "umm" and "uhh" to be typed out on sites like HN or reddit?

Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by reducesuffering on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @10:06PM (#26562740)
No it contributes to more natural conversation, illustrating the commenter’s thought process.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by noarchy on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:53AM (#26565977)
I didn’t think that “natural” conversation was an actual goal on HN. You see this particularly in the way that humour (among other things) is often downvoted and discouraged.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by angry_octet on Thursday March 25, 2021 @10:46AM (#26580934)
I upvote humour for this reason, and down vote posts that are anti-fun. Believing all writing should be dull is a characteristic of people who can't write well.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by croes on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @02:20PM (#26571045)
Should the process not be completed before you hit "submit". There is no need to simulate a live conversation.
Re:Suez canal blocked by a massive ship by stransky on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:45PM (#26562592)
Ummmm...no?