Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by macjohnmcc on Thursday December 31, 2020 @05:21PM
(#25597850)
I just thought of something. At the time blank CD-R's were about $15 each and the fastest burners at the time were 2x burners. I'm sorry I wasted so much of time the person who burned these and the cost of the media!
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by macjohnmcc on Thursday December 31, 2020 @03:57PM
(#25597031)
It took ages to figure out where the code even was in the many files and folders. The directory structure did not make it obvious.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by westmeal on Thursday December 31, 2020 @03:13PM
(#25596635)
Can't wait until cozy bear leaks that :D
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by sn_master on Thursday December 31, 2020 @06:11PM
(#25598323)
NT 4 code was already leaked almost full back in 2004. You can still find it with relative ease if you know where to look, or search for certain keywords in the code.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by keyle on Thursday December 31, 2020 @06:53PM
(#25598758)
Man I'm old, but give me NT 4 with modern technology support, modern drivers and GPU driven and I would move in a heartbeat.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by macjohnmcc on Friday January 01, 2021 @12:07PM
(#25604659)
Yeah I remember when there weren't dozens of services running in the background just for basic OS functionality.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by sn_master on Thursday December 31, 2020 @07:02PM
(#25598828)
What do you miss the most? The UI? Speed?
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by keyle on Thursday December 31, 2020 @10:53PM
(#25600700)
UX, speed, simplicity, lightness. Applications ran without talking to the internet, asking if it's ok to run it, telling me it's probably unsafe to run it, telling me I need to update for security reason, telling me I should play candy crush, letting me search my files without adding recommended noise somewhat supposed to be relevant to what I did 3 days ago. I could go on. I just want to stare at a blue flat colour knowing tomorrow it will be just the same. /s
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by vxNsr on Thursday December 31, 2020 @07:14PM
(#25598932)
Yes!
UI was amazing and obviously you can’t beat the speed it would run at on modern hardware
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by lukeschlather on Thursday December 31, 2020 @10:47PM
(#25600669)
Honestly I think Xfce is about the same. And probably more stable, though obviously it's hard to do a direct comparison.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by LargoLasskhyfv on Saturday January 02, 2021 @12:47AM
(#25610730)
Depending on the "Distro" and compile options/build flags/included libraries MATE is as fast and light, since at least 6 years, actually. I think the first distribution which showed that to a general audience was LMDE a.k.a. Linux Mint - Debian Edition.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by tonyedgecombe on Friday January 01, 2021 @06:25AM
(#25602500)
The window chrome is fine but the settings are a bit of a mess in my opinion.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by sn_master on Thursday December 31, 2020 @07:23PM
(#25599028)
UI shouldn't be too hard (https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/windowblinds/8628/). I am not so sure about the speed if you'll use modern drivers.
Re:SolarWinds hackers were able to access Microsoft source code
by macjohnmcc on Thursday December 31, 2020 @03:57PM
(#25597035)
Make that winning animation use the GPU!
Cool memory, thanks for sharing.