News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by Bancakes on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @05:21AM (#24696001)
Not easily.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by cies on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @05:42AM (#24696114)
With so many replacements products, it has never been easier. A replacement is at hand within a few meters of the animal derived product in most modern supermarkets. Also, Youtube is full of inspiration of how to replace any animal derived product. It's never been easier.

I think its more the will, than the ability, that's needed. And if someone considers some products "too hard to switch away from" then, just keep buying that one and skip the others.

Dont like cruelty to animals? Then stop buying it. It's that simple.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by Bancakes on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @05:54AM (#24696172)
What I'm saying is, it's really easy for me to boil a dozen eggs, grill some chicken bits, and boil half a pack of brown rice or quinoa. A week's worth of food, the caloric density is astounding. I then only need to make salads or play with frozen veggies.

All of this is really cheap and quick to make. Almond/coconut/soy milk costs nearly three times as much as cow's milk in my country, and the substitute 'meats' are hard to find outside supermarkets. Veganism here might as well be money laundering. To my knowledge, beyond burgers and such food is still pricey in the USA as well, for instance.

I'm just pointing out what makes me consider vegetarianism or veganism is eating more food, better food, for less money, and less pretentious heat treatment. I'm not finding it right now. Hopeful for the future, though.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by jamil7 on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @06:34AM (#24696344)
Dried beans, lentils, pulses and brown rice are cheap and dense in calories + protein. Throw some seasonal vegetables in when you have them. Eat some cut oats for breakfast. Nothing pretentious about that! You don't need all the processed meat substitutes, they're not especially healthy either. Also cows milk surely must be more expensive than oat milk to produce, but we all live in countries where dairy is heavily subsidized.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by waterhouse on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @06:41AM (#24696366)
Cheerful meat-eater here. I think that, if you got your protein through legumes, that would be even cheaper than eggs. It would probably mean rearchitecting your food in general rather than using drop-in replacements.

One website says that the cheapest eggs on its list (Costco) are 70 grams of protein per dollar, while the cheapest beans (pinto) are 80 grams per dollar, and lentils are 116 grams per dollar. Hmm, that difference is smaller than I expected. https://efficiencyiseverything.com/calorie-per-dollar-list/

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by Bancakes on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @06:53AM (#24696417)
That's awesome, however I also enjoy a varied diet. Thanks for the link.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by hazz99 on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @07:48AM (#24696727)
Millions of people in India eat a very varied, inexpensive vegetarian diet. And their food tastes great.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @07:13AM (#24696533)
I’d really like to see someone do the math on how many animals get killed growing plant-based meat substitutes. Mice sucked up when they harvest the corn, bugs sprayed with pesticides, etc.

Pasture-raised grass-fed beef might come out way better in comparison.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by graphpapa on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @07:30AM (#24696619)
This makes it sound like plant based diets are much crueler than they make out to be - but that harm is surely still an order of magnitude reduced compared to farming animals?

One is collateral damage (mice sucked up etc.) but the other is _premised_ on death.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by ceejayoz on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @07:56AM (#24696758)
> but that harm is surely still an order of magnitude reduced compared to farming animals?

Probably true if you compare it to conventional cattle farming, as they're largely fed corn from fields.

I suspect pasture raised, grass fed animals have a vastly lower deaths-per-bite count than a veggie burger, though. I don't know that I subscribe to the "accidental deaths matter less" argument, either.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by cies on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @08:22AM (#24696929)
A wild animal that inadvertently dies is not the same as a caged animal that is killed.

But yes, even plant foods incur animal suffering. Vegans know. Much, much less though.

> Pasture-raised grass-fed beef might come out way better in comparison.

If you consider a bugs life equal to a cows life: yes. Most people dont. I kill bugs when I drive my car, if I'd kill cows at the same rate as bug when driving, I'd stop driving.

Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by taneq on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @08:36AM (#24697033)
I see this kind of whataboutism almost every time people discuss the ethics of meat consumption and the surrounding industries. If growing plants commercially kills animals in the process then that's something else to examine but it doesn't change the fact that meat based industries are usually incredibly cruel.
Re:The Lucrative Art of Chicken Sexing (2017) by 082349872349872 on Tuesday October 06, 2020 @05:33AM (#24696071)
My family eats meat[1] in general yet has had no trouble avoiding chicken[2] specifically.

[1] Dairy farmers maximising milk output for feed input is why there is veal.

(Confining veal calves is illegal here, and labelling is enforced to the point that even restaurant waiters must be able to tell you the provenance of their meats.)

[2] We do occasionally take free range eggs.