News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by usrusr on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @04:43PM (#24413102)
By that measure, one could get the absurd idea to expect getting paid time off for that woodworking project. It even has "work" right in the name. Nobody does expect that though. Better arguments should be easy to find.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by jacquesm on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @04:49PM (#24413168)
Woodworking is a hobby. Raising kids is a full time job, no time off, no pay, no changing jobs.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by smabie on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @08:14PM (#24415199)
I mean, having kids is a hobby too. Both woodworking and having kids are born from free-will and decisions (except in exceptional circumstances).
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by evv on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @09:34PM (#24415768)
Historically, the exceptional circumstance is the free-will you speak of. It is a biological imperative, not a hobby.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by nicbou on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @05:15PM (#24413475)
What if "woodworking" was replaced with "volunteer firefighting"?
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by garden_hermit on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:13PM (#24414178)
If the region is at threat from massive wildfires, yes!

Just the same, if there is an national pandemic that has upended all traditional childcare options, then maybe give some slack to the parents

Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by jacquesm on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @05:58PM (#24414004)
This has to be the all time prize winner in moving the goalposts.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by nicbou on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:01PM (#24414044)
I'm not trying to move goalposts. My point is that parents get a special privilege that people with similarly charitable obligations wouldn't. If I wanted to do something undeniably good for society that is NOT rearing children, my employer wouldn't let me off the hook without a pay cut.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by baddox on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @11:34PM (#24416765)
Funny how we all seem to have just implicitly accepted that any people having any number of children under any circumstances is “undeniably good for society.”
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by jacquesm on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @06:32AM (#24419531)
Funny, how those that don't have children most likely do expect to have their pensions paid for by the children of the people that do have children.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by baddox on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @10:40AM (#24421520)
No, we do not expect to have pensions.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by ethanwillis on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:15PM (#24414195)
Maybe instead of focusing on parents getting some flexibility that you don't you should drop that completely and only make the argument that everyone (parents included) should be given leeway by employers to have flexibility when it comes to contributing to the public versus a private organization.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by nicbou on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:19PM (#24414229)
That's exactly the argument I have made, but perhaps it was under a different branch. I get a bit confused by the flow of conversation on HN.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by rdtwo on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:48PM (#24414521)
What if you joined the national guard I’m pretty sure they would. Why don’t you try it and see
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by klmadfejno on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @08:00PM (#24415084)
Making accommodation rules is hard. There's a lot more parents than there are firefighters. Maybe it makes sense to have a one off rule for parents.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by 9nGQluzmnq3M on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @09:28PM (#24415739)
I've worked for several companies that offered paid time off for volunteering. (With plenty of conditions and limits, of course.)
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by solidsnack9000 on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @09:57PM (#24415961)
Having kids is not a job.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by ineedasername on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @10:32PM (#24416255)
Don't get caught up splitting semantic hairs: having kids takes a lot of work. That's all people mean when they refer to it as a "job"
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by solidsnack9000 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @11:11PM (#24428562)
Well, jacquesm must mean something more than that, because woodworking is also a lot of work but jacquesm seems to feel that parenting should be treated differently.

Recognizing a distinction someone else is trying to draw with a term isn't splitting hairs.

[dead]
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by dang on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @03:01AM (#24418106)
Please don't do this here.
Re:Tech firms face growing resentment of parent employees du... by recursive on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @07:51PM (#24415004)
That's a hot take. I think a lot (almost all?) parents would rather lose their jobs that put their kids up for adoption. And abortion is only possible prior to birth. Most of the parents we're talking about now had kids prior to covid even being a thing.