News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by klenwell on Thursday August 15, 2019 @02:08PM (#20707941)
The victims didn't come forward because they felt so ashamed about falling for the con.

This is such an interesting essential part of scams. I guess it's a part of human nature.

I remember tracking down a phone scam that caught my grandmother once (based out of Montreal) and I eventually got to a point where I discovered that my grandmother had provided a verbal consent over the phone that had kept it just this side of being outright fraud. The scam company played a recording of it for me.

I wasn't sure this wasn't fabricated, so I tried to confirm with my grandmother and she was just like, "Well, thanks for all your help, honey, but really this isn't that important. Let's just move on."

I recognized how pushing it would just cause her unnecessary pain. So I dropped it and we moved on. Good to know there are people like Felipe around helping to keep things in check.

Now when Felipe just lives his life or goes out in the world, he can't help but think everything can be a con, and everybody can be a mark.

Yeah, I guess I see the world more or less the same way. And I suppose it makes me a little unusual. Hopefully not too cynical.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rdtsc on Thursday August 15, 2019 @03:48PM (#20708955)
> This is such an interesting essential part of scams. I guess it's a part of human nature.

Absolutely. It happened to my relatives too.

The way I found out was I was there visiting and they got a call which I picked it up. It came from what sounded like an Indian person. You see, they wanted to "refund the money" and just needed the bank account details.

Aha! I thought, I'll play dumb and pretended to mistype their remote desktop installer's web address and diverted the conversation to random stuff. Eventually they realized I was wasting their time and called me some exotic slang names, I hand't heard before. I am always up for cultural enrichment, so that was fun. Then they started playing this really high pitched sound into earpiece, I guess to "punish" me and trying to hurt my hearing.

However, it became less fun later when the relatives told me they had already lost close to $10k with them. They had contacted the bank and the police and apparently the bank refunded them some part of it. But otherwise they hadn't told anyone as they were terribly ashamed. They were professionals, already retired, with advanced degrees, and they felt like they should not have been the ones easily fooled, but they were.

So make sure you talk to your older family members, and tell them ahead of time to not be embarrassed if it already happened. Teach them how do respond and how to handle these scammers.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by munificent on Thursday August 15, 2019 @06:29PM (#20710344)
> Teach them how do respond and how to handle these scammers.

Concretely, the way to respond is this:

If you ever get a call that claims to be from business X, tell them "OK, I'll call you back." Then get off the phone, look up the number for X yourself, and call them. If it was really X calling you, you'll get back to where you need to be. If it was a scam, X will tell you they don't know what you're talking about.

Never trust that a cold call is from who they say they're from.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by localhost on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:04PM (#20710927)
Many years ago, I had a police detective call me about an active investigation. He wanted to come over to visually verify that I had something in my possession. I was suspicious, and he totally understood. He said, "go look up the phone number for <police station in jurisdiction> and ask to speak with detective so and so, badge number ZZZ".
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by chillwaves on Saturday August 17, 2019 @05:26PM (#20726518)
Here is a scam example of your anecdote that happened to a family member of mine, who was taken in for hours by "Police" in China (she speaks Mandarin).

They even spoofed the number of an actual police station and said, "Google the number on your caller ID to see we are legit". Obviously, call them back yourself.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by siffland on Saturday August 17, 2019 @04:34PM (#20726174)
Awesome. Always ask for a call back number. My dad was in his late 70s and fell for stuff like this. I beat the notion into his head, if in doubt ask for a call back number. If they they refuse to give it, it is a scam....period.

7 years was not enough for ruining peoples lives.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by bsamuels on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:32PM (#20711655)
Did you actually look it up and call the number?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by localhost on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:39PM (#20711993)
Yes I did. And a couple of days later, 2 detectives showed up, verified the item was in my possession and went on to the next person on their list. Incidentally they also marked the item by etching a number on it to make sure that they didn’t see it again, i.e., to rule out my cooperating with the person they were looking for.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by majortennis on Friday August 16, 2019 @10:10AM (#20715299)
what was it?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by natpalmer1776 on Friday August 16, 2019 @08:39PM (#20721082)
I would guess a firearm of some sort, as that's the only thing I can think of that would:

1.) be relevant to a police investigation 2.) be registered or associated with individuals 3.) have few enough of an exact thing in an area for the manual checking to be effective

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by itronitron on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:12AM (#20713414)
you can also just call 911, tell them it's not an emergency, and ask them to connect you to the police station
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by iends on Friday August 16, 2019 @09:03AM (#20714727)
I advise not being lazy and consuming emergency services if you can help it.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Plasmoid2000ad on Friday August 16, 2019 @06:02AM (#20713633)
Scammers are aware of this, and will often use a tactic of gradual escalation. At first, you have no reason to hang up and call them back, because the call seems harmless.

Good example would be someone claiming to be your ISP apologizing for recent slow internet speeds (when doesn't this happen), and wanting to confirm you're now happy and not experiencing slow speeds. Why would you doubt this and go to the trouble of calling back?

The other problem is businesses being so extremely dumb. I've had and heard of man cases of Banks calling people, asking them verification questions on cold calls and offering no way to call them back. Not just stupid in that it limits your strategy, but it actually trains people to be more vulnerable to scammers.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by knowow1 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:00PM (#20710536)
It works in the average situation, but unfortunately there are some huge scams happening(passing unnoticed) in undeveloped countries where somehow the scammers can hijack the number for a certain time frame.

If you call the same number the next day the real institution is going to answer, but nobody knows a thing.

Apparently, in some cases, they can hijack the phone number of an institution, but only for the specific caller that they are applying the scam. If someone from another context call the same number it goes to where it's supposed to be.

It's becoming more normal than ever down here... Happened next to me.

We are entering the age of personalized crime, targeted and framed just for you, considering your personality and necessities.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by ilaksh on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:38PM (#20711990)
One time I was having trouble with my PayPal MasterCard and called them from Mexico. I was sort of stranded because I needed the card to work to get an Uber and it was really hot so I didn't want to walk home. I don't remember if it was the 800 number or the local area code in the US. Probably 800 number. But I was in Mexico and dialed it the same way as I would in the US.

Someone from Mexico answered and initially it sounded very similar to what PayPal employees really say. It took like two minutes before I was really suspicious. I was really tired that day and didn't want to walk though so I kept trying to give them the benefit of the doubt. But a few minutes after that they actually asked me to go into 7/11 and buy a Google Play card for $150 or something. At that point it was just really obviously a scam and I decided to walk home. Called the real PayPal from my computer using the US area code.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by judge2020 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:02PM (#20711527)
In other cases, they might be able to take over the Google Maps listing (Google Search will show the listing from maps btw) due to it not being previously claimed/suggesting an update and can change the phone number to one they control: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18527328
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rasz on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:02PM (#20711794)
Look my comment above, scammers are exploiting basic principles of landline operation. Its the victims landline that gets "hijacked", not some institutions number.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by sysbin on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:09PM (#20710574)
Do you know if they’re doing this to people with mobile cells as well or is it only landlines?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by knowow1 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:44PM (#20710807)
I can check it out, but I think they're doing this to both.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rasz on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:58PM (#20711778)
Doesnt work. Scammers already adopted this to their advantage.

Conman calls a landline, starts conversation with "please call the bank back, im putting down the phone now" and ... just plays Dial tone. The trick is call ends only when the person who started it hangs up.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by justinclift on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:40AM (#20712712)
Hmm... "No worries, I'll do that but it'll probably be in a few days as I'm pretty busy now."

If they want to leave their line open "for a few days"... then good luck to them. :)

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Swenrekcah on Friday August 16, 2019 @04:39AM (#20713258)
A good one. Or if it’s something you really should verify right away, call your friend or relative first. If the scammer answers again, you’ll definately know.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by justinclift on Friday August 16, 2019 @11:41AM (#20716271)
Good tactic, that'd work. :)
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rasz on Friday August 16, 2019 @04:51AM (#20713309)
Except its your 60 year old mum answering the call, and 'calling back' just made her absolutely sure she can trust the nice bank lady on the phone.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by itronitron on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:16AM (#20713432)
or call a friend before calling the number
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by philpem on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:07AM (#20713397)
This was an issue with UK BT POTS lines some years ago. The line would 'hang' for a fair while after the recipient hung up before clearing down (disconnecting both sides).

The idea was, maybe you dropped your phone and didn't mean to hang up and this gave you time to rectify your mistake without having to redial.

Scammers started exploiting this and the timeout was reduced to the order of a few seconds. Count to five after hanging up and you can just about guarantee that's a real dialtone.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jtbayly on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:10PM (#20711839)
If you hang up and pick back up too quickly, yeah. But the call doesn't just stay connected until the cake hangs up. Either party can end it by hanging up, right?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by macintux on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:32PM (#20711950)
Landline calls, at least when I was younger, were not disconnected until the caller hung up. I assume there’s a technical reason involving channels instead of packets but I never researched it.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by chrisdhoover on Friday August 16, 2019 @10:48AM (#20715666)
Landline calls were disconnected after a timeout. The receiver could hangup and pick up quickly and still be connected. We used this method to move to another phone in the house. Also if you tapped the hook a few times the line would disconnect
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rasz on Friday August 16, 2019 @11:40PM (#20721853)
Technical reason was mechanical exchanges (Strowger etc) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUOh9fCSgqw

implementing logic/timers with cogs is impractical.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by pakwa on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:14PM (#20710610)
As an important addition to this - use a completely different line for calling the real company. If the suspicious call came from a cell, use another cell phone. If call came from landline, use a cell.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by daurnimator on Thursday August 15, 2019 @09:17PM (#20711316)
I don't think many people have more than one phone any more. e.g. I haven't had a landline in almost a decade.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by kingbirdy on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:04PM (#20710925)
Why do you say that? What difference would it make?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by dragonwriter on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:15PM (#20710988)
I suppose it's theoretically possible that a fraudulent caller had exploited your device or phone line in some way, though that's a rare and extreme case. Still, it doesn't hurt to mitigate it when you verify (of course, it's also theoretically possible the same attacker compromised your other phone, or just that of the business they are impersonating, too.)
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by noodlesUK on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:29PM (#20711069)
Especially with landlines it’s possible for them to stay on the line and pretend that they have hung up, play the dial tone and ring back noises, then continue the con. This is particularly easy with elderly people who have older phones.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by UweSchmidt on Friday August 16, 2019 @04:14AM (#20713122)
They played a high pitched sound into the earpiece? Wow, that's on another level.

Overall I think it's not worth being on the phone with these people. It's a no-win situation. For them it's a 'job', while you'd be investing your precious time and energy.

There is something about just watching, say, scammers doing the shell game in the streets, that is incredibly draining.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rdtsc on Friday August 16, 2019 @11:15AM (#20715990)
> They played a high pitched sound into the earpiece? Wow, that's on another level.

Yeah I expected the name calling but that was just something new. I guess I had really upset them. I imagine they had put my relatives on some kind of a "high value" mark list after they had gotten so much money from them, and they thought they were getting another easy $500 from them again. Instead they spent 30 of their time talking about weather, holidays, barbecue styles in US and other crap.

> There is something about just watching, say, scammers doing the shell game in the streets, that is incredibly draining.

Agree. In case of my relatives, I have to admit, I share some of the shame just because I felt I hadn't done my part to protect them earlier. There is an element of that that expand to the society. You know, watching this happen to other members of the community and thinking what can be done to stop it, why are they wasting their resources like that.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by feedbeef on Friday August 16, 2019 @01:58AM (#20712518)
Watching a scambaiter won't help recover their loss, but it may offer some form of vicarious revenge:

https://www.twitch.tv/kitboga

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by avgDev on Thursday August 15, 2019 @03:58PM (#20709029)
Ha!

I feel the same way but I encountered so many con artists.

My favorite con artists was actually a dentist and I fell for part of the "con". I guess you could argue if its a con but I feel like it was.

I went in for a simple fillings in two teeth, he starts drilling, then tells me I need inlays $800 a piece x 2. Being young and stupid I said, ok. I was so broke at the time, I needed to borrow money to pay. When I came back another customer was fighting with billing. 2nd con that dentist office did was sending bills for bs charges. I got two, but did research and asked for a detailed bill, which never came. A year or two later I start getting pain, and my new dentist is surprised I have inlays in back teeth and has to drill them out because they were done incorrectly.

So, yeah....don't pick a dentist based on google reviews and talk about treatment plan before drilling.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by p1esk on Thursday August 15, 2019 @06:03PM (#20710151)
So how do you pick a dentist?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Tade0 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @06:22PM (#20710288)
By word of mouth mostly.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by alxmdev on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:25PM (#20710685)
Absolutely, real-life word of mouth trumps all the algos and search engines. About time more people realize those are business marketing tools, not tools to help you.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by doctor_eval on Thursday August 15, 2019 @09:36PM (#20711418)
I see what you did there.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by p1esk on Friday August 16, 2019 @01:09AM (#20712359)
Nice username :)
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by thiagomgd on Thursday August 15, 2019 @06:14PM (#20710228)
Amazon reviews </sarcasm>
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by gumby on Thursday August 15, 2019 @02:33PM (#20708218)
The shame part is huge for elder folks. Not only the feeling "I must be old; I wouldn't have made this mistake when I was younger" (though you might have) but the feeling that others will realize you are losing it.

It's bad enough that banks and such are starting to set up arrangements where (adult) kids can intervene to prevent their parents from losing all their savings this way.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jansan on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:23PM (#20709264)
Long time (maybe twenty years) ago I read about a fascinating scam. The scammers were announcing a totally cool sex toy (maybe early VR, don't remember), but they never intended to deliver. Through clever marketing they managed to find enough potential customers who were asked to prepay a certain amount to finance production of the product (comparable to crowdfunding). When delivery day arrived, the scammers sent out letters to the customers with an apology that something went horribly wrong and the product could not be delivered. The letters included a bank cheque with a full refund, but the cheque said: "Refund for Sex Toy XYZ". As planned from the beginning, most customers were too ashamed to cash the cheque, so the scammers kept most of the money. Legally (?).
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by syntheticnature on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:28PM (#20709317)
Sounds like a bit from Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels: https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=379784
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jimminy on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:32PM (#20709353)
I don't know if that was a real scam. It was a bit of a throw away joke from the movie, 'Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels'.

The guys need to raise money to repay a debt, and one of them presents this idea, which gets tossed out because it's gonna take too long for them to receive the checks.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by K0balt on Saturday August 17, 2019 @01:58PM (#20725306)
It's much, much older than the movie reference. Embarrassing check scams are an old, tried and true scam. They were more popular backnin the days of physical chain letters.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jansan on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:35PM (#20709375)
I just found that this scam even has an entry on Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embarrassing_cheque

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by _emacsomancer_ on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:31PM (#20709339)
This is something which is discussed in Guy Ritchie's _Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels_ anyway.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jjeaff on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:38PM (#20709401)
If this actually happened, it would still be an illegal fraud. You would need to prove that was the intent all along, which would be difficult. But still illegal.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by ilaksh on Thursday August 15, 2019 @11:42PM (#20712006)
Isn't that just like an average KickStarter campaign?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by apsanz on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:33PM (#20709901)
Why not just deposit the check in an ATM or with an image
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by jansan on Friday August 16, 2019 @02:35AM (#20712690)
I think this was not possible at that time. Bank business was a lot more personal back in the old days. People knew each other and you wouldn't want to be the one in the community being know for having ordered a sex toy.

https://videosift.com/video/Dylan-Moran-tells-a-joke

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by chiph on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:54PM (#20709555)
My dad got taken by the "Hello this is Microsoft Support calling" scammers. They quickly got him to approve a remote connection to his machine and then they showed him a random registry entry as "proof" that his machine was infected with a virus. Which they just so happened to have the anti-virus for, for $300.

Dad was computer savvy, but by this point he was 80 years old and they flat-out took advantage of him. He had to mail me the machine so I could reload it.

Please - teach your parents to just hang up on these clowns. And to kill the browser process when they get popups trying to cause fear & doubt.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by kls on Friday August 16, 2019 @12:24PM (#20716777)
My great aunt was taken by the same scam twice. The second time even after I told her it was a scam. After the second time I locked her account down on her PC to not have install or remote desktop permissions and I had the only admin access. She only read email and chatted on skype with her grandkids. So she never felt the restrictions but it eliminated the problem of her giving access to these scammers.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by klenwell on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:09PM (#20709684)
> Please - teach your parents to just hang up on these clowns.

That was the other thing. It was impossible to get my grandparents to do this. I think I eventually got them to let the answering machine answer and not return calls for messages from anyone they didn't recognize.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Gibbon1 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:33PM (#20709899)
What would be nice is a service that just forwards unknown calls to someone competent.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by OJFord on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:39PM (#20710769)
Or just blocks them?

Because I'd like to think I'm 'someone competent', and on my own phone I only accept (non-personal) calls that I'm expecting, or can see a reason for.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by redler on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:19PM (#20710642)
Maybe this is a new angle for Google Voice or similar services. Protect vulnerable members of your family with a fail-safe auto-attendant system with approval rules.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by dwd on Thursday August 15, 2019 @09:42PM (#20711443)
It's not fully automatic and I'm sure scammers will come up with new scripts to still trick people into answering.

Over time it should allow Google to flag numbers as potentially being a scam, marketing, etc based on other users flagging a caller. Saves Googling for that information which is what I currently do with an unknown number. The only risk is spoofing/false positives putting your number on some blacklist.

https://support.google.com/phoneapp/answer/9118387?hl=en

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by irq-1 on Friday August 16, 2019 @10:48AM (#20715669)
Or live monitoring -- mention money or bank accounts and Google Voice contacts a family member, or cuts off the call, or ..?
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by dwd on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:03PM (#20710914)
Troy Hunt took on one of these groups years ago and let them loose in a VM to see what they did.

Their initial contact

https://www.troyhunt.com/anatomy-of-virus-call-centre-scam/

When he called them back

https://www.troyhunt.com/scamming-scammers-catching-virus-ca...

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by chiph on Thursday August 15, 2019 @09:47PM (#20711469)
They are apparently onto the VM trick now. I've heard of them checking the running processes for the virtualized network connection, etc.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Mirioron on Friday August 16, 2019 @09:38AM (#20714993)
There's a twitch streamer called Kitboga that messes with these types of scammers in VMs. It's pretty entertaining. He uses a voice changer and has a timer in the corner on how long he manages to keep a scammer occupied.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rhizome on Thursday August 15, 2019 @08:32PM (#20711089)
My mom only ever uses Thunderbird and Firefox, I've been considering converting her to Linux, which would make all of this impossible. She already knows the IRS isn't going to call her on the phone, much less arrest her.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by megaremote on Thursday August 15, 2019 @10:44PM (#20711705)
Or, get her an ipad.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by rhizome on Sunday August 18, 2019 @05:47AM (#20729256)
Been there, touch screens are too weird. Many older folks have been able to pick up internetting and sliding your finger on your pocket TV Library, but it's not 100%. Heck, I don't even know that I'll never lose the plot of the details and someday just have "a computer, the second least expensive one."
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by mgleason_3 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @04:10PM (#20709132)
I found it so interesting to hear that finding victims was the top impediment to prosecution. The amount of pain and anguish these scammers inflict upon some of our most vulnerable citizens is almost unbearable to think about.

I couldn’t help but wonder why the FCC hasn’t required CallerID Verification years ago.

Especially in this age where we are all being forced to get RealID cards so that our every move can be monitored...

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by dboreham on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:07PM (#20709674)
>I couldn’t help but wonder why the FCC hasn’t required CallerID Verification

Because corruption?

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Nextgrid on Friday August 16, 2019 @07:05AM (#20713925)
Because carriers (and thus the FCC since it's in bed with them) profit from delivering these spam calls and authenticated Caller ID would significantly decrease the amount of these calls.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by ALittleLight on Thursday August 15, 2019 @03:52PM (#20708982)
In college I worked at a computer repair center for students. When I was new, and before I knew how to talk around this, some people would describe to me what they were doing when they contracted the malware they were there about - at times being perfectly explicit and specific about what videos, exactly to the title, they were watching when they got malware.

I think the layman expected there was some character of a pathologist to my job. Like I would understand or diagnose that they had porno ransomware X on their system and the only solution was to do computer thing Y.

In reality, of course, regardless of the malware, I would just help the person back up all the data and configurations we could. Use a virus scanner on the backups, and reinstall their OS. How they got the malware was completely irrelevant, and I actually preferred not knowing. With a bit of experience I learned to preempt any detailed explanations by just stating my plan early and being clear that it didn't matter how they found the malware.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by im3w1l on Thursday August 15, 2019 @06:31PM (#20710356)
I would find it fascinating honestly. Maybe I'd throw in some tips on how to avoid reinfection.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by DoreenMichele on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:21AM (#20713453)
I guess it's a part of human nature.

I don't think this is true. I have read that most parents use either a shame model or a guilt model to try to keep the kids in line. So most people are brainwashed from an extremely early age to either feel shame or guilt, hide things from authority figures for fear of getting in trouble, etc.

That's not actually necessary.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by willis936 on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:17PM (#20709751)
Being careful isn’t a bad thing. Whenever sensitive information is involved I google the company to make sure the phone number is actually correct and if it’s a proper employee of the company I will find their listing. If their voice sounds like it doesn’t match their photo to a large degree or I can’t find the employee I will be very apprehensive about giving information and will ask them some questions. If it’s a con they usually give up quick and move onto the next one.
Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by bdowling on Thursday August 15, 2019 @05:44PM (#20709994)
> my grandmother had provided a verbal consent over the phone that had kept it just this side of being outright fraud.

If it was intentionally deceptive or coercive, it was probably outright fraud.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by klenwell on Thursday August 15, 2019 @07:21PM (#20710659)
You would hope, right? It's actually a lot of shades of gray.

The most astounding part about it was once the scammers had this verbal consent, they check could print a check themselves against my grandmother's account and cash it.

We started with my grandmother's bank, WAMU, thinking surely they would cancel or reverse the withdrawal. Nope, they had their fraud department "investigate" and concluded that the withdrawal was legitimate. Blew my fucking mind.

I started documenting my efforts to do something about this on a blog and eventually ended up getting contacted by email by a NY Times reporter who was investigating the subject. Well, if you're not ticked off enough by this story, read on:

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/business/20tele.html

My grandmother was lucky in that she was only taken for a couple thousand dollars. But even that could have been extremely tough on her if she hadn't had family around to pitch in to make up the loss.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by Nextgrid on Friday August 16, 2019 @07:25AM (#20714042)
> had entered a few sweepstakes that caused his name to appear in a database advertised by infoUSA, one of the largest compilers of consumer information

> InfoUSA advertised lists of “Elderly Opportunity Seekers,” 3.3 million older people “looking for ways to make money,” and “Suffering Seniors,” 4.7 million people with cancer or Alzheimer’s disease. “Oldies but Goodies” contained 500,000 gamblers over 55 years old, for 8.5 cents apiece. One list said: “These people are gullible. They want to believe that their luck can change.”

> Vast databases of names and personal information, sold to thieves by large publicly traded companies, have put almost anyone within reach of fraudulent telemarketers

> Mr. Guthrie’s name first appeared on a list used by scam artists around 2002, after he filled out a few contest entries that asked about his buying habits and other personal information.

This is a good argument against the cancer that is advertising, marketing, etc. Even if you truly have nothing to hide, are happy to receive targeted ads and offers, it's just a matter of time before the information falls into the wrong hands and gets used against you.

Re:The IT Guy vs. the Con Artist by ptah on Friday August 16, 2019 @05:03AM (#20713370)
you should read Iceberg slim's books. he cites a stronger requirement: the victim should be enticed to do/attempt something illegal so if they ever come forward they will incriminate themselves