News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by wHTL on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @01:39PM (#18339284)
This may sound cynical. But, I sigh each time I hear of such natural discoveries. This basically means humans will begin interfering in the name of research.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by fatjokes on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @01:58PM (#18339518)
That's optimistic. We'll probably try to eat them.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by twic on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @08:20PM (#18342393)
These are not an edible species of octopus, they live at a depth of over 3000 metres, five times deeper than any trawler can reach, and they're small - species in that genus are typically ~10 cm across, so all 1000 of them would make about a tonne, worth <$10k if they somehow became edible. I don't think they're in much danger of being eaten by humans.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by mikhailfranco on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @03:11AM (#18343834)
So a massive nursery of octopus, not a nursery of massive octopus.

P.S. I feel the plural of octopus should be neither octopi nor octopuses, but either: octopus - same as singular, you know, like 'sheep'; octopussies - for fun, because they're not as cute as cats.

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by grkvlt on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:02PM (#18347925)
Isn't the plural octopodes?
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by toephu2 on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:30AM (#18343722)
from the video they definitely look larger than 4 inches in diameter..
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pvaldes on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:03AM (#18344678)
CORRECTED: Is the length of the mantle. The round inflatable part close to the head. Tentacles and 'head' sensu-stricto are excluded.

Cephalopods will change a lot its length when tentacles are retracted (dead animal) or relaxed (alive), so 'mantle lenght' is used instead as a sort of equivalent to body length. Is a much less variable measure.

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by tkahnoski on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @05:12PM (#18341316)
An Octopus Farm would certainly be an interesting concept.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pvaldes on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @07:29PM (#18342128)
Some people is trying to do it since decades. Would be game-changing but is far from being solved still. The damned eight-armed tiny houdini's are too much smart for its own good.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pinko on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @09:05AM (#18345294)
Interesting! I wonder if it should give us pause that we're continuing to try to farm a creature that's so far proven too smart to allow us farm it successfully...
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by grkvlt on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:05PM (#18347949)
I believe the problem is that the octopuses (or cuttlefish, same problem) slowly produce less and less fertile percentage of eggs. So, first year 100%, then 50%, 20%, 5% then all sterile after five years, that sort of thing. And so far nobody really understands what we are or aren't doing, or what special nutrient, mineral, bacteria, plankton, something is or isn't present in the environment...
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by tkahnoski on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @09:58AM (#18345711)
Yeah. Definitely not an animal to be contained but creating an environment to keep healthy populations in stock would be a leap forward.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @02:00PM (#18339538)
It's pretty common in Wild Kratts.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by abhgh on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @04:02PM (#18340797)
One glimmer of hope is this is in Monterey - where the Moneterey Bay Aquarium is. I understand they have a few programs directed at conservation efforts. Let's hope they take this up.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by singularity2001 on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @05:03PM (#18341251)
Are Chinese bottom trawlers respecting Monterey territory?
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by jmalicki on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @08:38PM (#18342482)
It seems perfect compliance is a ways off, but the USCG spends a lot of effort enforcing EEZs and marine sanctuaries with a lot of results https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56c65ea3f2b77e3a78d34...
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pinko on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @09:06AM (#18345300)
Great, relevant link -- thanks!
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pvaldes on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @07:46PM (#18342209)
Very unprobable, but there is some hope

First of all the rocky botom can offer some kind of protection against trawls.

And second, is not clear if this octopus are edible. I can't identify the species with this video. Maybe Graneledone but I'm not sure. The much smaller squat lobster (Munida? Munidopsis?) in the video can be deceptive but the octopus look very small to me. We could be talking about a small animal of only 10cm of mantle length (body minus tentacles). Probably not valuable enough to risk the fishing material and spending fuel on it.

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by FajitaNachos on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @06:30PM (#18341816)
The jewel of Morro Bay, California.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by cryptozeus on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @03:46PM (#18340637)
Totally agree here, earlier there was a finding of huge shark nest somewhere in pecific. Scientists went out of their way to hide the location. That is what should have been done here.
Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by lozaning on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @04:18PM (#18340914)
I was under the impression that spot was actually pretty common knowledge and the most recent discovery was about _why_ they go to that location, not where it was.