singularity2001

  "the entire point of git is moot"

agents benefit from the same abstractions as humans do and they also benefit from a version system where the history can be tracked back where merch conflicts become obvious and so on

while sargassum is a bane for beaches, corals, and tourist industries, it's a big boon for ocean life far off the coast.

In 2030, Sam may advocate that screws mostly go to robots and no longer to private tools/utilities.

recently, I wasn't able to configure my ads because I've run out of Codex tokens. I haven't opened the ChatGPT app ever since.

"I just can't seem to stay interested and read LLM text."

For foreign text, sure. But I never was never able to read New York Times articles about some invention that started with Lucy leaving her home at seven o'clock.

If you have a specific question, reading LLM text can be more interesting than anything in the world. Even Wikipedia.

since dang doesn't check late comments for irrelevant trophe:

LOL!

I have the sensational $200 bamboo lab printer what would the $700 thing give me more?

rarely * 2 ≈ still rarely?

We ate them (and married)

So instead of the narrative of benchmaxing, in truth it's benchminimizing of competitors by the U.S. oligarchy?

there are rumors on Twitter that these upload system profiles to a S3 bucket.

I don't think AI can fix the process, ideology or people issues.

It can if a single developer replaces a whole team.

that would be one white page for me.

how do they distinguish 'attackers' from usual crawlers?

" There has been a lot of partiality in tech recently to plainly fascist "

For a second, I thought this is Dangs / HN official view now lol

with a different title, they would have achieved much higher engagement. e.g. CERN and Mistral evaluate if large latent models can advance physics

change a byte ... change it back, get a duplicate.

What are realistic scenarios in which you change a byte back?

switching to copy on write worktrees is the biggest game changer it should become common knowledge pretty soon and it's already available on most operating systems

in theory it could avoid car crashes in practice the dudes that buy these cars will probably cause more crashes;)

> now that AI has solved all our problems

Make it your problem to find problems that AI have not yet solved. Problem solved.

maybe they visited huggingface or something similar

as the article says one of the main jobs of the humans is to say no to Claude regularly

"There are no alarms ringing." I kid you not, that's the latest tick when I want to stop alarms with three devices in the room.

the most provocative comparison which I've heard a couple of times was "elevator operators".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_algorithm for those not in the know.

It says much more than that. It says that all custom architectures and approaches are become irrelevant if compute increases, which was proven again by the large latent models recently solving RL tasks better than any classical RL technique.

Checking that the theorem is what we really want to prove is much much less work than going through the whole proof though.

the common distinction between robot and machine is that machines are mostly stationary and don't move by themselves. (Self-driving cars sit in between, depending on further developments, they might slide into the bot category.)

they definitely do get answers. maybe the path is incomprehensible to you, but the yes or no answer is definitely there: that's what the formal provers are there for. In the worst case you have an Oracle which just answers your question with yes or no but in truth you get many more details if you want to look

just because humans don't understand it yet doesn't mean that the machine doesn't understand it and can build upon it