Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by twic on Tuesday October 30, 2018 @08:20PM (#18342393)

These are not an edible species of octopus, they live at a depth of over 3000 metres, five times deeper than any trawler can reach, and they're small - species in that genus are typically ~10 cm across, so all 1000 of them would make about a tonne, worth <$10k if they somehow became edible. I don't think they're in much danger of being eaten by humans.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by mikhailfranco on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @03:11AM (#18343834)

So a massive nursery of octopus, not a nursery of massive octopus.

P.S. I feel the plural of octopus should be neither octopi nor octopuses, but either: octopus - same as singular, you know, like 'sheep'; octopussies - for fun, because they're not as cute as cats.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by grkvlt on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:02PM (#18347925)

Isn't the plural octopodes?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by toephu2 on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:30AM (#18343722)

from the video they definitely look larger than 4 inches in diameter..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Massive octopus nursery found in deep sea by pvaldes on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:03AM (#18344678)

CORRECTED: Is the length of the mantle. The round inflatable part close to the head. Tentacles and 'head' sensu-stricto are excluded.

Cephalopods will change a lot its length when tentacles are retracted (dead animal) or relaxed (alive), so 'mantle lenght' is used instead as a sort of equivalent to body length. Is a much less variable measure.

[ Parent | on HN ]