News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by d23 on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @11:16AM (#15348593)
Be realistic. We're talking about the 99.9% of other people who don't have that condition.
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by Broken_Hippo on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @01:22PM (#15350070)
Where do you get your numbers from? Allergies are a pretty common thing. And the symptoms mimic a cold. Numbers seem to differ, but I'm getting anything from 10% to 30% of adults. [1] I'm pretty sure that makes your numbers bad.

And want folks to stay home? How the heck are they supposed to afford it when they can be contagious for 2 weeks? Heck, folks are contagious before their symptoms even start. How can one allow for that? [2] Most jobs aren't going to allow for that sort of time off, nor are schools. Most that do will require a doctor's note - and it hardly seems reasonable to go to a doctor for a simple cold virus.

[1] http://www.aaaai.org/about-aaaai/newsroom/allergy-statistics [2] https://www.healthline.com/health/cold-flu/contagious#overvi...

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by mattrices on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @11:28AM (#15348758)
The point is not all sneezes are due to colds. There are other causes that account for much more than .1%. Don't reinfoce societal pressure with biased probability analysis.
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by MSM on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @12:16PM (#15349270)
>Don't reinfoce societal pressure with biased probability analysis.

They aren't saying don't sneeze, they're saying cover your sneeze. It doesn't matter why you are sneezing, covering it is the standard.

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by debaserab2 on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @01:19PM (#15350009)
Agreed, but I think what is ridiculous is training your lungs to minimize the effectiveness of your sneeze. That is absolutely ridiculous: your body is sneezing for a reason, let it do its thing (and cover it).
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by Djvacto on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @01:45PM (#15350323)
I think his tips were meant as an option. To be quite honest I'll be trying some of these, because it's not a huge amount of effort at all.
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by k_sh on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @02:11PM (#15350593)
The CDC says 12.1% of the adult US population has sinusitis[1].

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/sinuses.htm

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by virmundi on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @03:07PM (#15351234)
So what? Transpeople are rather low as a percentage of the population, yet we extend or argue to extend massive courtesies to them. If you are going to make a policy, expect to include a small population.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/health/transgender-popula...

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by collyw on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @04:20PM (#15351903)
There are a lot of definitions of "trans" going about these days. Just search on Youtube of Reddit. Many of them are in my opinion attention seekers (not saying that genuine transgenderism doesn't exist, but a lot of people are making some very silly sounding claims lacking any scientific backing).
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by virmundi on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @05:57PM (#15352705)
I agree. There is also anecdotal evidence that within the trans community (MtF) that take hormones, the commuity is split into people wanting to trans-ition and to as a third way that spans the genders. My point in the original post is that we have policies for such a small group of people, that the OP should look into sneezing policies to take into account small groups.
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by jackhack on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:01PM (#15358811)
Here's a policy: Regardless of what's in your underpants -- don't sneeze in the air, don't cough on people and keep thy cooties to thyself. Pretty simple really.

Not everything is about sexual identity. This SJW nonsense has gone over the top. Please don't try to convince me we need a non-binary-trans-sneeze policy because of white cis privilege because you'd be wasting your time. If so, we have reached cultural peak absurdity.

Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by virmundi on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:09PM (#15358891)
Nope, not convincing you that you need a non-binary sneeze policy. I'm using that as an example of having policies that make sense when dealing with a minor population. The original example was people with sinititius and being able to comply with the policy. Also, another goal was to make people think do we even need such a draconian sneeze policy to begin with? What about the science that says that the more things you are exposed to the more resilient your system?
Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off... by jackmott on Wednesday September 27, 2017 @01:44PM (#15350315)
way more people that that have allergies