Re:Sickness absence associated with shared and open-plan off...
by virmundi on Thursday September 28, 2017 @01:09PM
(#15358891)
Nope, not convincing you that you need a non-binary sneeze policy. I'm using that as an example of having policies that make sense when dealing with a minor population. The original example was people with sinititius and being able to comply with the policy. Also, another goal was to make people think do we even need such a draconian sneeze policy to begin with? What about the science that says that the more things you are exposed to the more resilient your system?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.